CHI的愿景和愿景:CHI 2013特别兴趣小组会议

A. Quigley, A. Dix, W. Mackay, H. Ishii, Jürgen Steimle
{"title":"CHI的愿景和愿景:CHI 2013特别兴趣小组会议","authors":"A. Quigley, A. Dix, W. Mackay, H. Ishii, Jürgen Steimle","doi":"10.1145/2468356.2468826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many visions that touch on the future of human computer interaction from a trans-human future to a post-technological UI. However visions related to the progress of technology are not new. Creative and insightful visionaries from Denis Diderot to Vannevar Bush have been postulating visions of possible futures or technology for centuries. Some idealised views end up discredited with advances in knowledge, while others now appear remarkably prescient. The question is, do visions and the process of creating them have a place in CHI, or are they simply flights of fancy? This SIG meeting provides a forum for visionaries; researchers and practitioners looking to consider the place and importance of visions within CHI. Can visions, the process of visioning and forming new visions help us refine, advance or develop new research or forms of interaction. And if visions are important to us, then are they part of the regular academic process? If so, should CHI provide venues for publishing new visions?","PeriodicalId":228717,"journal":{"name":"CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visions and visioning in CHI: CHI 2013 special interest group meeting\",\"authors\":\"A. Quigley, A. Dix, W. Mackay, H. Ishii, Jürgen Steimle\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2468356.2468826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many visions that touch on the future of human computer interaction from a trans-human future to a post-technological UI. However visions related to the progress of technology are not new. Creative and insightful visionaries from Denis Diderot to Vannevar Bush have been postulating visions of possible futures or technology for centuries. Some idealised views end up discredited with advances in knowledge, while others now appear remarkably prescient. The question is, do visions and the process of creating them have a place in CHI, or are they simply flights of fancy? This SIG meeting provides a forum for visionaries; researchers and practitioners looking to consider the place and importance of visions within CHI. Can visions, the process of visioning and forming new visions help us refine, advance or develop new research or forms of interaction. And if visions are important to us, then are they part of the regular academic process? If so, should CHI provide venues for publishing new visions?\",\"PeriodicalId\":228717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

从跨人类的未来到后技术UI,有很多关于人机交互未来的设想。然而,与技术进步相关的愿景并不新鲜。从丹尼斯·狄德罗(Denis Diderot)到范内瓦尔·布什(Vannevar Bush),几个世纪以来,富有创造力和洞察力的空想家一直在设想可能的未来或技术。随着知识的进步,一些理想化的观点最终变得不可信,而另一些观点现在看起来非常有先见之明。问题是,愿景和创造愿景的过程在CHI中有一席之地吗,或者它们只是一种幻想?这个小组会议为有远见的人提供了一个论坛;研究人员和实践者希望考虑愿景在CHI中的地位和重要性。设想和形成新愿景的过程可以帮助我们完善,推进或发展新的研究或互动形式。如果愿景对我们很重要,那么它们是常规学术过程的一部分吗?如果是,智库是否应该提供发布新愿景的场所?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visions and visioning in CHI: CHI 2013 special interest group meeting
There are many visions that touch on the future of human computer interaction from a trans-human future to a post-technological UI. However visions related to the progress of technology are not new. Creative and insightful visionaries from Denis Diderot to Vannevar Bush have been postulating visions of possible futures or technology for centuries. Some idealised views end up discredited with advances in knowledge, while others now appear remarkably prescient. The question is, do visions and the process of creating them have a place in CHI, or are they simply flights of fancy? This SIG meeting provides a forum for visionaries; researchers and practitioners looking to consider the place and importance of visions within CHI. Can visions, the process of visioning and forming new visions help us refine, advance or develop new research or forms of interaction. And if visions are important to us, then are they part of the regular academic process? If so, should CHI provide venues for publishing new visions?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信