土著妇女团队合作内在动力量表的提出与有效性

Patricia Elizabeth Cossío-Torres, Xiomara Sarahí Sanjuan-Meza, Aida Ortega-Velázquez, Frida Hosana Aguilera-Díaz de León
{"title":"土著妇女团队合作内在动力量表的提出与有效性","authors":"Patricia Elizabeth Cossío-Torres, Xiomara Sarahí Sanjuan-Meza, Aida Ortega-Velázquez, Frida Hosana Aguilera-Díaz de León","doi":"10.22409/rcj.v9i23.56059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teamwork can be understood a process where the members are recognised as a unit, that shows interdependence but works together for a common objective; this practice is relevant to achieve the progress and develop, especially in vulnerable groups. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability from the scores obtained of an instrument with three components of internal dynamics in Teamwork (Task Interdependence, Group Potency and Psychological Safety) in indigenous women of Mexico. The sample consisted of 96 participants. Internal consistency was evaluated by using the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the internal structure was determined by using the principal component factorial analysis with Varimax rotation. The scores on each of the subscales showed an acceptable degree of internal consistency (αinter=.712, αgroup=.701, αacceptance=.716 y αsupport=.682). The factor analysis showed that in two of the three sections (Task Interdependence and Group Potency) the items loaded to a component that explained 47.12% and 44.99% of the variance, respectively. In psychological safety, the items were grouped into two components, explaining 60.54 % of the total variance. The version of a scale of Teamwork proposed in this work is a valid and reliable version that could be useful for the evaluation of teamwork in indigenous women.","PeriodicalId":122116,"journal":{"name":"Revista Culturas Jurídicas","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROPOSAL AND VALIDITY OF A SCALE OF TEAMWORK’S INTERNAL DYNAMICS IN INDIGENOUS WOMEN\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Elizabeth Cossío-Torres, Xiomara Sarahí Sanjuan-Meza, Aida Ortega-Velázquez, Frida Hosana Aguilera-Díaz de León\",\"doi\":\"10.22409/rcj.v9i23.56059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teamwork can be understood a process where the members are recognised as a unit, that shows interdependence but works together for a common objective; this practice is relevant to achieve the progress and develop, especially in vulnerable groups. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability from the scores obtained of an instrument with three components of internal dynamics in Teamwork (Task Interdependence, Group Potency and Psychological Safety) in indigenous women of Mexico. The sample consisted of 96 participants. Internal consistency was evaluated by using the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the internal structure was determined by using the principal component factorial analysis with Varimax rotation. The scores on each of the subscales showed an acceptable degree of internal consistency (αinter=.712, αgroup=.701, αacceptance=.716 y αsupport=.682). The factor analysis showed that in two of the three sections (Task Interdependence and Group Potency) the items loaded to a component that explained 47.12% and 44.99% of the variance, respectively. In psychological safety, the items were grouped into two components, explaining 60.54 % of the total variance. The version of a scale of Teamwork proposed in this work is a valid and reliable version that could be useful for the evaluation of teamwork in indigenous women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Culturas Jurídicas\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Culturas Jurídicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22409/rcj.v9i23.56059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Culturas Jurídicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22409/rcj.v9i23.56059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

团队合作可以理解为一个过程,在这个过程中,成员被视为一个整体,相互依存,但为了共同的目标而共同努力;这一做法与取得进展和发展有关,特别是在弱势群体中。本研究的目的是评价墨西哥土著妇女团队合作内部动力三个组成部分(任务相互依赖、群体效力和心理安全)的效度和信度。样本由96名参与者组成。内部一致性采用Cronbach α系数评价,内部结构采用Varimax旋转主成分析因分析确定。各分量表得分均表现出可接受的内部一致性(αinter=)。712年,α=。701年,α=。α支持度= 0.682)。因子分析表明,在三个部分中的两个部分(任务相互依赖和群体效力)中,加载到一个组件的项目分别解释了47.12%和44.99%的方差。在心理安全方面,项目被分为两个组成部分,解释了总方差的60.54%。本研究提出的团队合作量表是一个有效且可靠的版本,可用于评估土著妇女的团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROPOSAL AND VALIDITY OF A SCALE OF TEAMWORK’S INTERNAL DYNAMICS IN INDIGENOUS WOMEN
Teamwork can be understood a process where the members are recognised as a unit, that shows interdependence but works together for a common objective; this practice is relevant to achieve the progress and develop, especially in vulnerable groups. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability from the scores obtained of an instrument with three components of internal dynamics in Teamwork (Task Interdependence, Group Potency and Psychological Safety) in indigenous women of Mexico. The sample consisted of 96 participants. Internal consistency was evaluated by using the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the internal structure was determined by using the principal component factorial analysis with Varimax rotation. The scores on each of the subscales showed an acceptable degree of internal consistency (αinter=.712, αgroup=.701, αacceptance=.716 y αsupport=.682). The factor analysis showed that in two of the three sections (Task Interdependence and Group Potency) the items loaded to a component that explained 47.12% and 44.99% of the variance, respectively. In psychological safety, the items were grouped into two components, explaining 60.54 % of the total variance. The version of a scale of Teamwork proposed in this work is a valid and reliable version that could be useful for the evaluation of teamwork in indigenous women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信