消除非系统法律腐败和专业法律的罪行

Gufroni Gufroni
{"title":"消除非系统法律腐败和专业法律的罪行","authors":"Gufroni Gufroni","doi":"10.33019/PROGRESIF.V13I1.1030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nThis article examines the empirical facts about the failure of the state (government) to eradicate this already acute corruption. Although there are laws that regulate it and there is already a special commission to eradicate corruption, namely the KPK, many still fail. The main cause is that our law still adheres to the all-mechanical-formal-legalistic system built by legal positivism. So on that basis there needs to be a new formulation as an alternative effort to make Indonesia free from corrupt practices. This study uses two theoretical approaches, namely non-systemic law / chaos theory and prophetic law. According to chaos theory, Charles Sampford in his book entitled The Disorder of Law Critical of Legal Legal Theory is not seen as a system-mechanical building, but also as liquid reality. Chaos theory states, legal theory that must be understood as a system-mechanical chaos theory (according to the view of legal positivism) is clearly a mistake, that is a mistake from the beginning in photographing legal reality. The Prophetic law is one approach in understanding the contents of the verses of the Koran. This approach focuses more on empirical, historical and temporal aspects. In the prophetic paradigm, Kuntowijoyo understands that knowing God and learning revelation are important elements in explaining reality. He took this view from a Japanese scholar, Toshihiko Izutsu, who put up his work on the Semantic Al-Qur'an Field, in the title of God and Man in the Koran: Semantics of the Koranic Weltanchauung. Of the two new offers in the effort to eradicate corruption, it was found empirical facts that there is something wrong in understanding corruption itself so that it still remains a disease that threatens the moral of a nation. The key must be courage not to be confined in the shackles of the mechanically-formal-legalistic positivism of law.","PeriodicalId":448451,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Hukum Non Sistemik dan Hukum Profetik\",\"authors\":\"Gufroni Gufroni\",\"doi\":\"10.33019/PROGRESIF.V13I1.1030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nThis article examines the empirical facts about the failure of the state (government) to eradicate this already acute corruption. Although there are laws that regulate it and there is already a special commission to eradicate corruption, namely the KPK, many still fail. The main cause is that our law still adheres to the all-mechanical-formal-legalistic system built by legal positivism. So on that basis there needs to be a new formulation as an alternative effort to make Indonesia free from corrupt practices. This study uses two theoretical approaches, namely non-systemic law / chaos theory and prophetic law. According to chaos theory, Charles Sampford in his book entitled The Disorder of Law Critical of Legal Legal Theory is not seen as a system-mechanical building, but also as liquid reality. Chaos theory states, legal theory that must be understood as a system-mechanical chaos theory (according to the view of legal positivism) is clearly a mistake, that is a mistake from the beginning in photographing legal reality. The Prophetic law is one approach in understanding the contents of the verses of the Koran. This approach focuses more on empirical, historical and temporal aspects. In the prophetic paradigm, Kuntowijoyo understands that knowing God and learning revelation are important elements in explaining reality. He took this view from a Japanese scholar, Toshihiko Izutsu, who put up his work on the Semantic Al-Qur'an Field, in the title of God and Man in the Koran: Semantics of the Koranic Weltanchauung. Of the two new offers in the effort to eradicate corruption, it was found empirical facts that there is something wrong in understanding corruption itself so that it still remains a disease that threatens the moral of a nation. The key must be courage not to be confined in the shackles of the mechanically-formal-legalistic positivism of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33019/PROGRESIF.V13I1.1030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33019/PROGRESIF.V13I1.1030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了国家(政府)未能根除这种已经严重的腐败的经验事实。尽管有法律对其进行规范,并且已经有一个专门的委员会来根除腐败,即肃贪会,但许多仍然失败。究其原因,主要是我国法律仍然固守着由法律实证主义构建的全机械-形式-法律体系。因此,在此基础上,需要有一个新的方案,作为使印度尼西亚摆脱腐败行为的另一种努力。本研究采用两种理论方法,即非系统规律/混沌理论和预言规律。根据混沌理论,查尔斯·桑普福德在《法论批判》一书中认为,法律不是一种系统机械的建筑,而是一种流动的现实。混沌理论指出,法律理论必须被理解为一种系统机械的混沌理论(根据法律实证主义的观点),这显然是一个错误,这是从一开始就对法律现实的拍摄错误。先知律法是理解《古兰经》经文内容的一种方法。这种方法更侧重于经验、历史和时间方面。在预言范式中,Kuntowijoyo理解认识上帝和学习启示是解释现实的重要因素。他从日本学者Toshihiko Izutsu那里获得了这一观点,Toshihiko Izutsu在《古兰经中的神与人:古兰经世界的语义》一书中发表了他关于古兰经语义领域的研究。在根除腐败的两项新提议中,人们发现了一些经验事实,即对腐败本身的理解是错误的,因此它仍然是一种威胁国家道德的疾病。关键是要有勇气,不要被法律的机械-形式-法律实证主义的枷锁所束缚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Hukum Non Sistemik dan Hukum Profetik
  This article examines the empirical facts about the failure of the state (government) to eradicate this already acute corruption. Although there are laws that regulate it and there is already a special commission to eradicate corruption, namely the KPK, many still fail. The main cause is that our law still adheres to the all-mechanical-formal-legalistic system built by legal positivism. So on that basis there needs to be a new formulation as an alternative effort to make Indonesia free from corrupt practices. This study uses two theoretical approaches, namely non-systemic law / chaos theory and prophetic law. According to chaos theory, Charles Sampford in his book entitled The Disorder of Law Critical of Legal Legal Theory is not seen as a system-mechanical building, but also as liquid reality. Chaos theory states, legal theory that must be understood as a system-mechanical chaos theory (according to the view of legal positivism) is clearly a mistake, that is a mistake from the beginning in photographing legal reality. The Prophetic law is one approach in understanding the contents of the verses of the Koran. This approach focuses more on empirical, historical and temporal aspects. In the prophetic paradigm, Kuntowijoyo understands that knowing God and learning revelation are important elements in explaining reality. He took this view from a Japanese scholar, Toshihiko Izutsu, who put up his work on the Semantic Al-Qur'an Field, in the title of God and Man in the Koran: Semantics of the Koranic Weltanchauung. Of the two new offers in the effort to eradicate corruption, it was found empirical facts that there is something wrong in understanding corruption itself so that it still remains a disease that threatens the moral of a nation. The key must be courage not to be confined in the shackles of the mechanically-formal-legalistic positivism of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信