宗教法庭对伊斯兰经济问题的裁决分析(宗教法庭裁决编号:0689/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mlg的个案研究)

Arip Imawan, A. Hadi
{"title":"宗教法庭对伊斯兰经济问题的裁决分析(宗教法庭裁决编号:0689/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mlg的个案研究)","authors":"Arip Imawan, A. Hadi","doi":"10.30651/justeko.v4i2.6849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Malang Religious Court has the authority to decide cases on Islamic economic disputes. Decision numbered: 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg is a ruling stating that they reject the plaintiff's claim regarding the cancellation of the mortgage. The formulation of the problem in this study was how the litigation procedure in the Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement of the Malang Religious Court and the legal basis for judges' consideration in deciding case number 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg. This study used qualitative methods with primary data source for decision number 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg and secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, DSN-MUI fatwa, documentation, and interview with judges of the Malang Religious Court. Conclusion Thesis, legal considerations used by the Panel of Judges in Decision Number: 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg wereappropriate. These legal considerations used Law number 3 of 2006 and Law number 50 of 2009 concerning religious courts, Law number 4 of 1996 concerning mortgage rights and objects related to land, Law number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic banking, DSN fatwa MUI number 11 / DSN-MUI / IV / 2000 concerning Kafalah and Perma number 2 of 2008 concerning Sharia Economic Law Compilation. However, in using consideration Permenkeu 106 / PMK.06 / 2013 was not appropriate because the Permenkeu had been revoked and was not valid because there was a Permenkeu 27 / PMK.06/2016. Key Words : Sharia Economic Disputes, Mortgage Rights, Religious Courts","PeriodicalId":402140,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA MALANG TENTANG HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Malang nomor: 0689/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mlg)\",\"authors\":\"Arip Imawan, A. Hadi\",\"doi\":\"10.30651/justeko.v4i2.6849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Malang Religious Court has the authority to decide cases on Islamic economic disputes. Decision numbered: 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg is a ruling stating that they reject the plaintiff's claim regarding the cancellation of the mortgage. The formulation of the problem in this study was how the litigation procedure in the Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement of the Malang Religious Court and the legal basis for judges' consideration in deciding case number 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg. This study used qualitative methods with primary data source for decision number 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg and secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, DSN-MUI fatwa, documentation, and interview with judges of the Malang Religious Court. Conclusion Thesis, legal considerations used by the Panel of Judges in Decision Number: 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg wereappropriate. These legal considerations used Law number 3 of 2006 and Law number 50 of 2009 concerning religious courts, Law number 4 of 1996 concerning mortgage rights and objects related to land, Law number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic banking, DSN fatwa MUI number 11 / DSN-MUI / IV / 2000 concerning Kafalah and Perma number 2 of 2008 concerning Sharia Economic Law Compilation. However, in using consideration Permenkeu 106 / PMK.06 / 2013 was not appropriate because the Permenkeu had been revoked and was not valid because there was a Permenkeu 27 / PMK.06/2016. Key Words : Sharia Economic Disputes, Mortgage Rights, Religious Courts\",\"PeriodicalId\":402140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v4i2.6849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v4i2.6849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玛琅宗教法庭有权裁决伊斯兰经济纠纷案件。决议编号:0689 / Pdt。G / 2017 / pa。Mlg是一份裁决书,声明他们拒绝原告关于取消抵押的索赔。本研究问题的提法是玛琅宗教法院的伊斯兰教法经济争端解决中的诉讼程序以及法官在判决第0689 / Pdt号案件时考虑的法律依据。G / 2017 / PA.Mlg本研究采用定性方法,主要数据源为决策号0689 / Pdt。G / 2017 / pa。Mlg和辅助数据的形式,法律和法规,DSN-MUI法特瓦,文件和采访法官的玛琅宗教法院。论文,法官小组在第0689 / Pdt号决定中使用的法律考虑。G / 2017 / pa。Mlg wereappropriate。这些法律考虑使用了关于宗教法庭的2006年第3号法和2009年第50号法,关于抵押权利和与土地有关的物品的1996年第4号法,关于伊斯兰银行的2008年第21号法,关于Kafalah的DSN fatwa MUI第11 / DSN-MUI / IV / 2000号法,以及2008年关于伊斯兰教法汇编的Perma第2号法。然而,在使用对价时,Permenkeu 106 / PMK.06/ 2013是不合适的,因为Permenkeu已经被撤销,并且由于Permenkeu 27 / PMK.06/2016而无效。关键词:伊斯兰教经济纠纷,抵押权利,宗教法院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA MALANG TENTANG HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Malang nomor: 0689/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mlg)
The Malang Religious Court has the authority to decide cases on Islamic economic disputes. Decision numbered: 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg is a ruling stating that they reject the plaintiff's claim regarding the cancellation of the mortgage. The formulation of the problem in this study was how the litigation procedure in the Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement of the Malang Religious Court and the legal basis for judges' consideration in deciding case number 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg. This study used qualitative methods with primary data source for decision number 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg and secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, DSN-MUI fatwa, documentation, and interview with judges of the Malang Religious Court. Conclusion Thesis, legal considerations used by the Panel of Judges in Decision Number: 0689 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Mlg wereappropriate. These legal considerations used Law number 3 of 2006 and Law number 50 of 2009 concerning religious courts, Law number 4 of 1996 concerning mortgage rights and objects related to land, Law number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic banking, DSN fatwa MUI number 11 / DSN-MUI / IV / 2000 concerning Kafalah and Perma number 2 of 2008 concerning Sharia Economic Law Compilation. However, in using consideration Permenkeu 106 / PMK.06 / 2013 was not appropriate because the Permenkeu had been revoked and was not valid because there was a Permenkeu 27 / PMK.06/2016. Key Words : Sharia Economic Disputes, Mortgage Rights, Religious Courts
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信