刑事侦查中实施个人认定的科学新界限:不可重复认定与实施认定程序有充分嫌疑的要求

Jonathan Dantas Pessoa
{"title":"刑事侦查中实施个人认定的科学新界限:不可重复认定与实施认定程序有充分嫌疑的要求","authors":"Jonathan Dantas Pessoa","doi":"10.23880/ijfsc-16000313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recognition of people is a means of proof widely used in the practice of Brazilian criminal investigations, and the inadequate application of this instrument has been a source of serious judicial errors, requiring the help of knowledge from the psychology of testimony to improve this means of evidence. In this article, some peculiarities of this investigative procedure were discussed which, once understood, will make it possible to improve the accuracy of this means of proof, being verified based on bibliographical research the uniqueness of the recognition procedure and the need for a minimum of previous elements of proof to be verified. provide this means of proof (need for well-founded suspicion), demonstrating that the diligence of recognition, as it is extremely suggestive, must be handled only once during the investigation, and that only after obtaining minimal evidence that links the suspect in the alignment with the crime being investigated, with a view to making the aforementioned procedure safer and avoiding the greater occurrence of judicial errors in the handling of this investigative technique.","PeriodicalId":231200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forensic Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Scientific Limits for Carrying Out Personal Recognition in Crim-Inal Investigations: Unrepeatable Recognition and Requirement of Well-Founded Suspicion to Carry Out the Recognition Procedure\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Dantas Pessoa\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ijfsc-16000313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recognition of people is a means of proof widely used in the practice of Brazilian criminal investigations, and the inadequate application of this instrument has been a source of serious judicial errors, requiring the help of knowledge from the psychology of testimony to improve this means of evidence. In this article, some peculiarities of this investigative procedure were discussed which, once understood, will make it possible to improve the accuracy of this means of proof, being verified based on bibliographical research the uniqueness of the recognition procedure and the need for a minimum of previous elements of proof to be verified. provide this means of proof (need for well-founded suspicion), demonstrating that the diligence of recognition, as it is extremely suggestive, must be handled only once during the investigation, and that only after obtaining minimal evidence that links the suspect in the alignment with the crime being investigated, with a view to making the aforementioned procedure safer and avoiding the greater occurrence of judicial errors in the handling of this investigative technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forensic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对人的承认是巴西刑事调查实践中广泛使用的一种证明手段,对这一手段的不适当应用已成为严重司法错误的根源,需要证词心理学知识的帮助来改进这一证据手段。在本文中,讨论了这一调查程序的一些特点,一旦了解这些特点,将有可能提高这种证明手段的准确性,根据书目研究核实承认程序的独特性,并需要至少核实以前的证明要素。提供这种证明手段(需要有充分根据的怀疑),表明在调查期间必须只处理一次极具暗示意义的确认工作,并且只能在获得将嫌疑人与正在调查的罪行联系起来的最低限度证据之后处理,以便使上述程序更加安全,并避免在处理这种调查技术时更多地发生司法错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Scientific Limits for Carrying Out Personal Recognition in Crim-Inal Investigations: Unrepeatable Recognition and Requirement of Well-Founded Suspicion to Carry Out the Recognition Procedure
The recognition of people is a means of proof widely used in the practice of Brazilian criminal investigations, and the inadequate application of this instrument has been a source of serious judicial errors, requiring the help of knowledge from the psychology of testimony to improve this means of evidence. In this article, some peculiarities of this investigative procedure were discussed which, once understood, will make it possible to improve the accuracy of this means of proof, being verified based on bibliographical research the uniqueness of the recognition procedure and the need for a minimum of previous elements of proof to be verified. provide this means of proof (need for well-founded suspicion), demonstrating that the diligence of recognition, as it is extremely suggestive, must be handled only once during the investigation, and that only after obtaining minimal evidence that links the suspect in the alignment with the crime being investigated, with a view to making the aforementioned procedure safer and avoiding the greater occurrence of judicial errors in the handling of this investigative technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信