测试故障处理机制的两种故障注入技术

J. Karlsson, U. Gunneflo, P. Lidén, J. Torin
{"title":"测试故障处理机制的两种故障注入技术","authors":"J. Karlsson, U. Gunneflo, P. Lidén, J. Torin","doi":"10.1109/TEST.1991.519504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two fault injection techniques for experimental validation of fault handling mechanisms in computer systems are investigated and compared. One technique is based on irradiation of ICs with heavy-ion radiation from a 252Cf source. The other technique uses voltage sags injected in the power supply rails to ICs. Both techniques have been used for fault injection experiments with the MC6809E microprocessor. Most errors generated by the 252Cf method were seen first in the address bus, while the power supply disturbances most frequently affected the control signals. An error classification shows that both methods generate many control flow errors, while pure data errors are infrequent. Results from a simulation experiment show that that the low number data errors in the 252Cf experiments can be explained by the fact that many errors in data registers are overwritten owing to the normal program execution.","PeriodicalId":272630,"journal":{"name":"1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TWO FAULT INJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR TEST OF FAULT HANDLING MECHANISMS\",\"authors\":\"J. Karlsson, U. Gunneflo, P. Lidén, J. Torin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEST.1991.519504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two fault injection techniques for experimental validation of fault handling mechanisms in computer systems are investigated and compared. One technique is based on irradiation of ICs with heavy-ion radiation from a 252Cf source. The other technique uses voltage sags injected in the power supply rails to ICs. Both techniques have been used for fault injection experiments with the MC6809E microprocessor. Most errors generated by the 252Cf method were seen first in the address bus, while the power supply disturbances most frequently affected the control signals. An error classification shows that both methods generate many control flow errors, while pure data errors are infrequent. Results from a simulation experiment show that that the low number data errors in the 252Cf experiments can be explained by the fact that many errors in data registers are overwritten owing to the normal program execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.1991.519504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.1991.519504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

研究并比较了两种用于计算机系统故障处理机制实验验证的故障注入技术。一种技术是用252Cf源的重离子辐射照射集成电路。另一种技术是将电压跌落注入到集成电路的电源轨道中。这两种技术已用于MC6809E微处理器的故障注入实验。252Cf方法产生的大多数错误首先出现在地址总线上,而电源干扰最频繁地影响控制信号。错误分类表明,这两种方法都会产生大量的控制流错误,而纯数据错误很少发生。仿真实验结果表明,252Cf实验中数据错误较少的原因可以解释为由于程序正常执行而覆盖了数据寄存器中的许多错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TWO FAULT INJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR TEST OF FAULT HANDLING MECHANISMS
Two fault injection techniques for experimental validation of fault handling mechanisms in computer systems are investigated and compared. One technique is based on irradiation of ICs with heavy-ion radiation from a 252Cf source. The other technique uses voltage sags injected in the power supply rails to ICs. Both techniques have been used for fault injection experiments with the MC6809E microprocessor. Most errors generated by the 252Cf method were seen first in the address bus, while the power supply disturbances most frequently affected the control signals. An error classification shows that both methods generate many control flow errors, while pure data errors are infrequent. Results from a simulation experiment show that that the low number data errors in the 252Cf experiments can be explained by the fact that many errors in data registers are overwritten owing to the normal program execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信