北高加索历史文化区域的跨文化交际及其主要民族语言特征

O. G. Tsyganskaya, Inna I. Lizenko, Olesya S. Makarova
{"title":"北高加索历史文化区域的跨文化交际及其主要民族语言特征","authors":"O. G. Tsyganskaya, Inna I. Lizenko, Olesya S. Makarova","doi":"10.55959/msu2074-6636-22-2022-3-105-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the study of the problems of intercultural communication in the North Caucasian region. Th e relevance of the study lies in a detailed diachronic analysis of the historical, cultural and ethnolinguistic features of the interaction between representatives of Russian culture and the culture of the peoples of the Caucasus. The aim of the study is a diachronic analysis of the main aspects of interaction between the peoples of the North Caucasus and the Russian Empire, starting from the second half of the 18th century and ending with the problems of present-day intercultural communication. For a comprehensive analysis, the works of Russian historians, sociologists and linguists are used as a reference material in the work, in addition to the diachronic approach, some approaches of foreign cultural scientists are used. The results of the study are refl ected in the comparison of the historical, cultural and ethno-linguistic features of cultural polymorphism in the North Caucasian historical and cultural region, carried out using the integration approach of T. Adorno. To maintain the principles of historicism and objectivism, a historical source is used, viz. “The latest geographical and historical news about the Caucasus” by S.М. Bronevsky, contemporary with the events described. Bronevsky not only prepared most of the material on the Russian-Persian, Russian-Turkish and Russian-Caucasian treaties by the beginning of the second stage of the Caucasian War, but also left comments regarding the ethnolinguistic features of the content of these documents. For example, their inconsistency or the incompetence of Russian translators. Th e historical experience of modern historians I. F. Blaramberg and Yu.Yu. Klychnikov provides further underpinnings. On the basis of the studied material on the 18th and 19th centuries in relation to the southern political direction, a brief description of the modern ethnic and sociolinguistic features of the region is given.","PeriodicalId":122728,"journal":{"name":"Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal","volume":"104 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN THE NORTH CAUCASUS HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL REGION AND ITS MAIN ETHNOLINGUISTIC FEATURES\",\"authors\":\"O. G. Tsyganskaya, Inna I. Lizenko, Olesya S. Makarova\",\"doi\":\"10.55959/msu2074-6636-22-2022-3-105-118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to the study of the problems of intercultural communication in the North Caucasian region. Th e relevance of the study lies in a detailed diachronic analysis of the historical, cultural and ethnolinguistic features of the interaction between representatives of Russian culture and the culture of the peoples of the Caucasus. The aim of the study is a diachronic analysis of the main aspects of interaction between the peoples of the North Caucasus and the Russian Empire, starting from the second half of the 18th century and ending with the problems of present-day intercultural communication. For a comprehensive analysis, the works of Russian historians, sociologists and linguists are used as a reference material in the work, in addition to the diachronic approach, some approaches of foreign cultural scientists are used. The results of the study are refl ected in the comparison of the historical, cultural and ethno-linguistic features of cultural polymorphism in the North Caucasian historical and cultural region, carried out using the integration approach of T. Adorno. To maintain the principles of historicism and objectivism, a historical source is used, viz. “The latest geographical and historical news about the Caucasus” by S.М. Bronevsky, contemporary with the events described. Bronevsky not only prepared most of the material on the Russian-Persian, Russian-Turkish and Russian-Caucasian treaties by the beginning of the second stage of the Caucasian War, but also left comments regarding the ethnolinguistic features of the content of these documents. For example, their inconsistency or the incompetence of Russian translators. Th e historical experience of modern historians I. F. Blaramberg and Yu.Yu. Klychnikov provides further underpinnings. On the basis of the studied material on the 18th and 19th centuries in relation to the southern political direction, a brief description of the modern ethnic and sociolinguistic features of the region is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"104 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55959/msu2074-6636-22-2022-3-105-118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55959/msu2074-6636-22-2022-3-105-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于研究北高加索地区的跨文化交际问题。该研究的相关性在于对俄罗斯文化代表与高加索地区各民族文化之间互动的历史、文化和民族语言特征进行了详细的历时分析。该研究的目的是对北高加索人民与俄罗斯帝国之间互动的主要方面进行历时分析,从18世纪下半叶开始,以当今跨文化交流的问题结束。为了全面分析,在工作中使用了俄罗斯历史学家,社会学家和语言学家的作品作为参考材料,除了历时方法外,还使用了国外文化科学家的一些方法。运用阿多诺(T. Adorno)的整合方法,对北高加索历史文化区域文化多态性的历史、文化和民族语言特征进行比较,体现了研究结果。为了保持历史主义和客观主义的原则,使用了一个历史来源,即S.М的“关于高加索的最新地理和历史新闻”。布罗涅夫斯基,与所描述的事件同时代。布罗涅夫斯基在高加索战争第二阶段开始时,不仅准备了大部分关于俄-波斯、俄-土耳其和俄-高加索条约的材料,而且对这些文件内容的民族语言特征留下了评论。例如,他们的不一致或俄语翻译的无能。近代历史学家布拉兰伯格和俞宇的历史经验。Klychnikov提供了进一步的基础。根据18世纪和19世纪与南方政治方向有关的研究材料,对该地区的现代民族和社会语言特征进行了简要描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN THE NORTH CAUCASUS HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL REGION AND ITS MAIN ETHNOLINGUISTIC FEATURES
This article is devoted to the study of the problems of intercultural communication in the North Caucasian region. Th e relevance of the study lies in a detailed diachronic analysis of the historical, cultural and ethnolinguistic features of the interaction between representatives of Russian culture and the culture of the peoples of the Caucasus. The aim of the study is a diachronic analysis of the main aspects of interaction between the peoples of the North Caucasus and the Russian Empire, starting from the second half of the 18th century and ending with the problems of present-day intercultural communication. For a comprehensive analysis, the works of Russian historians, sociologists and linguists are used as a reference material in the work, in addition to the diachronic approach, some approaches of foreign cultural scientists are used. The results of the study are refl ected in the comparison of the historical, cultural and ethno-linguistic features of cultural polymorphism in the North Caucasian historical and cultural region, carried out using the integration approach of T. Adorno. To maintain the principles of historicism and objectivism, a historical source is used, viz. “The latest geographical and historical news about the Caucasus” by S.М. Bronevsky, contemporary with the events described. Bronevsky not only prepared most of the material on the Russian-Persian, Russian-Turkish and Russian-Caucasian treaties by the beginning of the second stage of the Caucasian War, but also left comments regarding the ethnolinguistic features of the content of these documents. For example, their inconsistency or the incompetence of Russian translators. Th e historical experience of modern historians I. F. Blaramberg and Yu.Yu. Klychnikov provides further underpinnings. On the basis of the studied material on the 18th and 19th centuries in relation to the southern political direction, a brief description of the modern ethnic and sociolinguistic features of the region is given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信