M. Casale-Rossi, P. Leduc, G. Micheli, P. Blouet, B. Farley, A. Fontanelli, D. Milojevic, Steve Smith
{"title":"专题讨论:“3D-IC仍然是未来的技术吗……即使是在未来?”","authors":"M. Casale-Rossi, P. Leduc, G. Micheli, P. Blouet, B. Farley, A. Fontanelli, D. Milojevic, Steve Smith","doi":"10.7873/DATE.2013.310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If asked \"who needs faster planes?\" the vast majority of the 2.75 billion airline passengers (source: IATA 2011) would say that they do need faster planes, and that they need them right now. Still, the commercial aircrafts cruising speed has remained the same -- 800 km/hour -- over the last 50+ years, and after the sad end of the Concorde project, neither Airbus nor Boeing are seriously working on the topic. Along the same lines, when asked \"who needs 3D-IC?\", most IC designers say that they desperately need 3D-IC to keep advancing electronic products performance, whilst addressing the needs of higher bandwidth, lower cost, heterogeneous integration, and power constraints. Still, 3D-IC continues to be the technology of the future. What are the road blocks towards 3D-IC adoption? Is it process technology, foundry or OSAT commercial offering, or EDA, or the business economics that is holding 3D-IC on the ground? In the introductory presentation of this panel session, LETI Patrick Leduc will illustrate the state-of-the-art of commercial, mainstream 3D-IC. EPFL Professor Giovanni de Micheli will then moderate an industry and research panel, to understand what are the key factors preventing 3D-IC from becoming the technology of today.","PeriodicalId":205976,"journal":{"name":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe","volume":"153 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panel: \\\"will 3D-IC remain a technology of the future... even in the future?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"M. Casale-Rossi, P. Leduc, G. Micheli, P. Blouet, B. Farley, A. Fontanelli, D. Milojevic, Steve Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.7873/DATE.2013.310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If asked \\\"who needs faster planes?\\\" the vast majority of the 2.75 billion airline passengers (source: IATA 2011) would say that they do need faster planes, and that they need them right now. Still, the commercial aircrafts cruising speed has remained the same -- 800 km/hour -- over the last 50+ years, and after the sad end of the Concorde project, neither Airbus nor Boeing are seriously working on the topic. Along the same lines, when asked \\\"who needs 3D-IC?\\\", most IC designers say that they desperately need 3D-IC to keep advancing electronic products performance, whilst addressing the needs of higher bandwidth, lower cost, heterogeneous integration, and power constraints. Still, 3D-IC continues to be the technology of the future. What are the road blocks towards 3D-IC adoption? Is it process technology, foundry or OSAT commercial offering, or EDA, or the business economics that is holding 3D-IC on the ground? In the introductory presentation of this panel session, LETI Patrick Leduc will illustrate the state-of-the-art of commercial, mainstream 3D-IC. EPFL Professor Giovanni de Micheli will then moderate an industry and research panel, to understand what are the key factors preventing 3D-IC from becoming the technology of today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design, Automation and Test in Europe\",\"volume\":\"153 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design, Automation and Test in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7873/DATE.2013.310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7873/DATE.2013.310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
如果被问到“谁需要更快的飞机?”27.5亿航空乘客中的绝大多数人会说他们确实需要更快的飞机,而且他们现在就需要。尽管如此,商用飞机的巡航速度在过去的50多年里一直保持在800公里/小时,在协和式飞机项目的悲惨结局之后,空客和波音都没有认真研究这个话题。同样,当被问及“谁需要3D-IC?”时,大多数IC设计师表示,他们迫切需要3D-IC来不断提高电子产品的性能,同时满足更高带宽、更低成本、异构集成和功耗限制的需求。尽管如此,3D-IC仍然是未来的技术。采用3d集成电路的障碍是什么?是工艺技术、铸造厂或OSAT商业产品、EDA还是商业经济推动了3D-IC的发展?在本次小组会议的介绍中,LETI Patrick Leduc将介绍最新的商业主流3D-IC。随后,EPFL教授Giovanni de Micheli将主持一个行业和研究小组,以了解阻碍3D-IC成为当今技术的关键因素。
Panel: "will 3D-IC remain a technology of the future... even in the future?"
If asked "who needs faster planes?" the vast majority of the 2.75 billion airline passengers (source: IATA 2011) would say that they do need faster planes, and that they need them right now. Still, the commercial aircrafts cruising speed has remained the same -- 800 km/hour -- over the last 50+ years, and after the sad end of the Concorde project, neither Airbus nor Boeing are seriously working on the topic. Along the same lines, when asked "who needs 3D-IC?", most IC designers say that they desperately need 3D-IC to keep advancing electronic products performance, whilst addressing the needs of higher bandwidth, lower cost, heterogeneous integration, and power constraints. Still, 3D-IC continues to be the technology of the future. What are the road blocks towards 3D-IC adoption? Is it process technology, foundry or OSAT commercial offering, or EDA, or the business economics that is holding 3D-IC on the ground? In the introductory presentation of this panel session, LETI Patrick Leduc will illustrate the state-of-the-art of commercial, mainstream 3D-IC. EPFL Professor Giovanni de Micheli will then moderate an industry and research panel, to understand what are the key factors preventing 3D-IC from becoming the technology of today.