《创世纪》中的克隆在女性主义领域中的性别等级

A. Karodia, Shanaaz Essop
{"title":"《创世纪》中的克隆在女性主义领域中的性别等级","authors":"A. Karodia, Shanaaz Essop","doi":"10.12816/0028309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper attempts by means of a literature review to discuss Cloning as outlined in Genesis for sex hierarchy in the feminist Domain. In positing arguments in respect of the subject matter, the researchers are aware that the topic is a controversial issue that will raise concerns from various quarters. In no way does the paper attempt to compromise the belief system of Christians or for that matter Christianity. It explores the concept as outlined in the Old Testament and links the concept to the New Testament in terms of both the theological and socio – cultural paradigm. The paper must therefore, be clearly understood without emotion from the perspectives of feminist theology. In so doing the paper makes some salient observations, in this regard using the bible as its point of reference. It therefore, further explores the mass control of people through the processes of colonialism and imperialism that was used to subjugate people in order to adhere to the tenets of Christianity. In so doing, the paper argues that Christianity was used to passively and aggressively, exploit the masses, and to drive its globalizing agenda. It also argues that the concepts of liberation and equality, in the context of feminism, are reactionary to social reform and therefore, cannot be substantiated by biblical reinterpretation. It further argues that including genesis there are other verses of gender inequality in the bible, which seems to ratify Eve’s secondary position to Adam or woman’s secondary position to men. The paper therefore explores the biological aspects of biblical patriarchy in terms of the concepts of primal socialization. The authors have no doubt that the paper through the concept of a literature review will open up sensitive issues that have not hitherto been explored. The paper uses empirical evidence based on science to articulate the views of the authors. In this sense the literature review sets out to explore and discuss this important issue from the perspective of broadening our horizons in respect of issues that have hitherto not been fully explained to the adherents of the different religions and particularly to the adherents of Christianity in terms of the equality of women. It is hoped that this paper will reach a wide audience and shed some light on an important subject matter and topic that requires further in depth exploration by researchers in general.","PeriodicalId":124555,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cloning in Genesis for Sex Hierarchy in the Feminist Domain\",\"authors\":\"A. Karodia, Shanaaz Essop\",\"doi\":\"10.12816/0028309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper attempts by means of a literature review to discuss Cloning as outlined in Genesis for sex hierarchy in the feminist Domain. In positing arguments in respect of the subject matter, the researchers are aware that the topic is a controversial issue that will raise concerns from various quarters. In no way does the paper attempt to compromise the belief system of Christians or for that matter Christianity. It explores the concept as outlined in the Old Testament and links the concept to the New Testament in terms of both the theological and socio – cultural paradigm. The paper must therefore, be clearly understood without emotion from the perspectives of feminist theology. In so doing the paper makes some salient observations, in this regard using the bible as its point of reference. It therefore, further explores the mass control of people through the processes of colonialism and imperialism that was used to subjugate people in order to adhere to the tenets of Christianity. In so doing, the paper argues that Christianity was used to passively and aggressively, exploit the masses, and to drive its globalizing agenda. It also argues that the concepts of liberation and equality, in the context of feminism, are reactionary to social reform and therefore, cannot be substantiated by biblical reinterpretation. It further argues that including genesis there are other verses of gender inequality in the bible, which seems to ratify Eve’s secondary position to Adam or woman’s secondary position to men. The paper therefore explores the biological aspects of biblical patriarchy in terms of the concepts of primal socialization. The authors have no doubt that the paper through the concept of a literature review will open up sensitive issues that have not hitherto been explored. The paper uses empirical evidence based on science to articulate the views of the authors. In this sense the literature review sets out to explore and discuss this important issue from the perspective of broadening our horizons in respect of issues that have hitherto not been fully explained to the adherents of the different religions and particularly to the adherents of Christianity in terms of the equality of women. It is hoped that this paper will reach a wide audience and shed some light on an important subject matter and topic that requires further in depth exploration by researchers in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12816/0028309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0028309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过文献综述的方式来讨论《创世纪》中概述的克隆在女权主义领域的性别等级。在提出关于主题的论点时,研究人员意识到这个话题是一个有争议的问题,会引起各个方面的关注。这篇文章并没有试图对基督徒的信仰体系或基督教做出妥协。它探讨了旧约中概述的概念,并从神学和社会文化范式的角度将这一概念与新约联系起来。因此,必须从女性主义神学的角度,不带感情地清楚地理解这篇文章。在此过程中,本文提出了一些突出的观察,在这方面使用圣经作为其参考点。因此,它进一步探讨了通过殖民主义和帝国主义的过程对人民的大规模控制,这些过程被用来征服人民,以坚持基督教的信条。在这样做的过程中,论文认为基督教被用来被动地和积极地剥削大众,并推动其全球化议程。它还认为,在女权主义的背景下,解放和平等的概念是对社会改革的反动,因此不能通过重新解释圣经来证实。它进一步认为,包括《创世纪》在内,圣经中还有其他关于性别不平等的经文,这似乎证实了夏娃的地位次于亚当,或者女人的地位次于男人。因此,本文在原始社会化的概念方面探讨了圣经父权制的生物学方面。作者毫不怀疑,这篇论文通过对概念的文献综述将打开迄今为止尚未探索的敏感问题。这篇论文使用基于科学的经验证据来阐明作者的观点。从这个意义上说,文献综述的目的是探索和讨论这个重要的问题,从拓宽我们的视野的角度来看,这个问题迄今为止还没有向不同宗教的信徒,特别是基督教的信徒充分解释妇女平等的问题。希望这篇论文能够达到广泛的受众,并对一个需要研究人员进一步深入探索的重要主题和主题有所启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cloning in Genesis for Sex Hierarchy in the Feminist Domain
The paper attempts by means of a literature review to discuss Cloning as outlined in Genesis for sex hierarchy in the feminist Domain. In positing arguments in respect of the subject matter, the researchers are aware that the topic is a controversial issue that will raise concerns from various quarters. In no way does the paper attempt to compromise the belief system of Christians or for that matter Christianity. It explores the concept as outlined in the Old Testament and links the concept to the New Testament in terms of both the theological and socio – cultural paradigm. The paper must therefore, be clearly understood without emotion from the perspectives of feminist theology. In so doing the paper makes some salient observations, in this regard using the bible as its point of reference. It therefore, further explores the mass control of people through the processes of colonialism and imperialism that was used to subjugate people in order to adhere to the tenets of Christianity. In so doing, the paper argues that Christianity was used to passively and aggressively, exploit the masses, and to drive its globalizing agenda. It also argues that the concepts of liberation and equality, in the context of feminism, are reactionary to social reform and therefore, cannot be substantiated by biblical reinterpretation. It further argues that including genesis there are other verses of gender inequality in the bible, which seems to ratify Eve’s secondary position to Adam or woman’s secondary position to men. The paper therefore explores the biological aspects of biblical patriarchy in terms of the concepts of primal socialization. The authors have no doubt that the paper through the concept of a literature review will open up sensitive issues that have not hitherto been explored. The paper uses empirical evidence based on science to articulate the views of the authors. In this sense the literature review sets out to explore and discuss this important issue from the perspective of broadening our horizons in respect of issues that have hitherto not been fully explained to the adherents of the different religions and particularly to the adherents of Christianity in terms of the equality of women. It is hoped that this paper will reach a wide audience and shed some light on an important subject matter and topic that requires further in depth exploration by researchers in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信