卫生保健配给论的建构

Gary W. Taylor, H. Hawley
{"title":"卫生保健配给论的建构","authors":"Gary W. Taylor, H. Hawley","doi":"10.1300/J185v03n03_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this paper is to uncover arguments over rationing health care as outlined in the British broadsheets. Following a brief introduction to the development of rationing in Britain, it considers the role of the media in society and looks at the arguments developed by the right wing media and contrasts these with the perspectives of the center left. It is argued that although these two perspectives have things in common, they differ significantly in the ways they view the social responsibilities of the state and in the way they interpret the health needs of the nation.","PeriodicalId":437502,"journal":{"name":"The Social Policy Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Construction of Arguments Over the Rationing of Health Care\",\"authors\":\"Gary W. Taylor, H. Hawley\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J185v03n03_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this paper is to uncover arguments over rationing health care as outlined in the British broadsheets. Following a brief introduction to the development of rationing in Britain, it considers the role of the media in society and looks at the arguments developed by the right wing media and contrasts these with the perspectives of the center left. It is argued that although these two perspectives have things in common, they differ significantly in the ways they view the social responsibilities of the state and in the way they interpret the health needs of the nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Social Policy Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Social Policy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J185v03n03_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Social Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J185v03n03_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是揭示在英国大报概述配给卫生保健的争论。在简要介绍了英国配给制度的发展之后,它考虑了媒体在社会中的作用,并研究了右翼媒体提出的论点,并将其与中左翼的观点进行了对比。有人认为,尽管这两种观点有共同之处,但它们在看待国家社会责任的方式和解释国家健康需求的方式上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Construction of Arguments Over the Rationing of Health Care
Abstract The aim of this paper is to uncover arguments over rationing health care as outlined in the British broadsheets. Following a brief introduction to the development of rationing in Britain, it considers the role of the media in society and looks at the arguments developed by the right wing media and contrasts these with the perspectives of the center left. It is argued that although these two perspectives have things in common, they differ significantly in the ways they view the social responsibilities of the state and in the way they interpret the health needs of the nation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信