教育词刺激联想场的比较分析

Olena Denysevych
{"title":"教育词刺激联想场的比较分析","authors":"Olena Denysevych","doi":"10.36273/2076-9555.2022.2(307).26-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the comparison of associative fields, which differ in the time of fixation and by obtaining associative material. To compare the content of the associative fields, EDUCATION took an associative field from the Dictionary of Associative Definitions of Nouns of the Ukrainian Language in 1989, which was formed as a result of a chain associative experiment and an associative field obtained by a free associative experiment in 2007 and 2021. The results of the comparison showed that the core of associative value remained unchanged. The connotative fragment is represented to a greater extent by positively colored reactions in the two associative fields. \nIn both associative fields EDUCATION is thought of primarily as higher with a repetition rate of 33. In the associative field stimulus EDUCATION, which we find in the dictionary, the most frequent reaction is also higher, but with a frequency of 184 times, which reveals the prestige of higher education among Ukrainians. In the associative field we find reactions with a negative value — insufficient (frequency 8), bad, dangerous, low, funny, poor. Instead, most reactions contain a positive assessment of good (6), high, sufficient, impressive, good, qualified, strong, necessary. \nIn the associative field of 2007, evaluative reactions are presented much less often and exclusively of positive content (best, mind 4, grade). In our opinion, a large number of evaluative reactions in the associative field of 1989 is explained by the research method chosen by the researcher to collect associative material, namely to provide a definition of the proposed stimulus. \"Types of education\" and \"Emotional vector\" became similar vectors for both associative fields. \nLexical associations are a certain concentration of mental, cultural, textual and other knowledge. The reactions detected by free and chain experiments testify to the values and opinions of the language community during the experiment. When comparing associative fields, one can observe the dynamics of changes in the conceptual system of society, because during life a person rethinks or receives new information that affects the nature of the association. \nThe results of a free associative experiment can help to design and improve curricula for higher education students and take their interests into account. The results of the comparison of associative fields show first of all the coincidence of nuclear tokens in the structure of the word meaning. \nIn the future, conducting psycholinguistic experiments with the word-stimulus EDUCATION will help to improve educational programs, to identify relevant knowledge for the implementation of educational initiatives. This is the perspective of our study. The influence of communication technologies on language consciousness in the educational environment. Therefore, we also consider it relevant to conduct research to compare the results of experiments conducted in the form of online and offline.","PeriodicalId":211054,"journal":{"name":"Вісник Книжкової палати","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the associative fields of the word-stimulus of EDUCATION\",\"authors\":\"Olena Denysevych\",\"doi\":\"10.36273/2076-9555.2022.2(307).26-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the comparison of associative fields, which differ in the time of fixation and by obtaining associative material. To compare the content of the associative fields, EDUCATION took an associative field from the Dictionary of Associative Definitions of Nouns of the Ukrainian Language in 1989, which was formed as a result of a chain associative experiment and an associative field obtained by a free associative experiment in 2007 and 2021. The results of the comparison showed that the core of associative value remained unchanged. The connotative fragment is represented to a greater extent by positively colored reactions in the two associative fields. \\nIn both associative fields EDUCATION is thought of primarily as higher with a repetition rate of 33. In the associative field stimulus EDUCATION, which we find in the dictionary, the most frequent reaction is also higher, but with a frequency of 184 times, which reveals the prestige of higher education among Ukrainians. In the associative field we find reactions with a negative value — insufficient (frequency 8), bad, dangerous, low, funny, poor. Instead, most reactions contain a positive assessment of good (6), high, sufficient, impressive, good, qualified, strong, necessary. \\nIn the associative field of 2007, evaluative reactions are presented much less often and exclusively of positive content (best, mind 4, grade). In our opinion, a large number of evaluative reactions in the associative field of 1989 is explained by the research method chosen by the researcher to collect associative material, namely to provide a definition of the proposed stimulus. \\\"Types of education\\\" and \\\"Emotional vector\\\" became similar vectors for both associative fields. \\nLexical associations are a certain concentration of mental, cultural, textual and other knowledge. The reactions detected by free and chain experiments testify to the values and opinions of the language community during the experiment. When comparing associative fields, one can observe the dynamics of changes in the conceptual system of society, because during life a person rethinks or receives new information that affects the nature of the association. \\nThe results of a free associative experiment can help to design and improve curricula for higher education students and take their interests into account. The results of the comparison of associative fields show first of all the coincidence of nuclear tokens in the structure of the word meaning. \\nIn the future, conducting psycholinguistic experiments with the word-stimulus EDUCATION will help to improve educational programs, to identify relevant knowledge for the implementation of educational initiatives. This is the perspective of our study. The influence of communication technologies on language consciousness in the educational environment. Therefore, we also consider it relevant to conduct research to compare the results of experiments conducted in the form of online and offline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Вісник Книжкової палати\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Вісник Книжкової палати\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36273/2076-9555.2022.2(307).26-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вісник Книжкової палати","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36273/2076-9555.2022.2(307).26-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对不同的联想场进行了比较,在不同的注视时间和不同的联想材料的获取上。为了比较联想字段的内容,EDUCATION选取了1989年乌克兰语名词联想定义词典中的联想字段,该联想字段是通过链式联想实验形成的,而2007年和2021年通过自由联想实验获得的联想字段。对比结果表明,联想值的核心不变。内涵片段在更大程度上由两个联想领域的积极着色反应来表示。在这两个相关的领域中,教育被认为主要是更高的,重复率为33。在我们在字典中找到的联想领域刺激教育中,最频繁的反应也更高,但频率为184次,这揭示了乌克兰人接受高等教育的威望。在联想领域,我们发现反应具有负值——不足(频率8)、坏的、危险的、低的、有趣的、可怜的。相反,大多数反应都包含对好、高、足够、令人印象深刻、好、合格、强、必要的积极评价。在2007年的联想领域,评价性反应出现的频率要低得多,而且只出现在积极的内容上(最好,头脑4,等级)。我们认为,1989年联想领域中出现的大量评价性反应,可以用研究者收集联想材料所选择的研究方法来解释,即对所提出的刺激提供一个定义。“教育类型”和“情感向量”成为这两个联想领域的类似向量。词汇联想是心理、文化、文本和其他知识的一定集中。自由和链式实验所检测到的反应证明了实验过程中语言社区的价值观和观点。当比较联想领域时,人们可以观察到社会概念系统变化的动态,因为在生活中,一个人会重新思考或接受影响联想性质的新信息。一个自由联想实验的结果可以帮助设计和改进高等教育学生的课程,并考虑他们的兴趣。联想域比较的结果首先显示了词义结构中核符号的一致性。在未来,利用词语刺激教育进行心理语言学实验,将有助于改进教育计划,为教育活动的实施识别相关知识。这是我们研究的视角。在教育环境中,传播技术对语言意识的影响。因此,我们也认为有必要进行研究,以线上和线下的形式对实验结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of the associative fields of the word-stimulus of EDUCATION
The article is devoted to the comparison of associative fields, which differ in the time of fixation and by obtaining associative material. To compare the content of the associative fields, EDUCATION took an associative field from the Dictionary of Associative Definitions of Nouns of the Ukrainian Language in 1989, which was formed as a result of a chain associative experiment and an associative field obtained by a free associative experiment in 2007 and 2021. The results of the comparison showed that the core of associative value remained unchanged. The connotative fragment is represented to a greater extent by positively colored reactions in the two associative fields. In both associative fields EDUCATION is thought of primarily as higher with a repetition rate of 33. In the associative field stimulus EDUCATION, which we find in the dictionary, the most frequent reaction is also higher, but with a frequency of 184 times, which reveals the prestige of higher education among Ukrainians. In the associative field we find reactions with a negative value — insufficient (frequency 8), bad, dangerous, low, funny, poor. Instead, most reactions contain a positive assessment of good (6), high, sufficient, impressive, good, qualified, strong, necessary. In the associative field of 2007, evaluative reactions are presented much less often and exclusively of positive content (best, mind 4, grade). In our opinion, a large number of evaluative reactions in the associative field of 1989 is explained by the research method chosen by the researcher to collect associative material, namely to provide a definition of the proposed stimulus. "Types of education" and "Emotional vector" became similar vectors for both associative fields. Lexical associations are a certain concentration of mental, cultural, textual and other knowledge. The reactions detected by free and chain experiments testify to the values and opinions of the language community during the experiment. When comparing associative fields, one can observe the dynamics of changes in the conceptual system of society, because during life a person rethinks or receives new information that affects the nature of the association. The results of a free associative experiment can help to design and improve curricula for higher education students and take their interests into account. The results of the comparison of associative fields show first of all the coincidence of nuclear tokens in the structure of the word meaning. In the future, conducting psycholinguistic experiments with the word-stimulus EDUCATION will help to improve educational programs, to identify relevant knowledge for the implementation of educational initiatives. This is the perspective of our study. The influence of communication technologies on language consciousness in the educational environment. Therefore, we also consider it relevant to conduct research to compare the results of experiments conducted in the form of online and offline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信