屏幕镜像:战争的破碎现实

H. Chmil
{"title":"屏幕镜像:战争的破碎现实","authors":"H. Chmil","doi":"10.37627/2311-9489-23-2023-1.8-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented conceptualization of the discursive field of the screen mirror as a reflection of the Reality of Russia's war against Ukraine fits into the situation of the presence of multiple discourses of this war, where each author builds their own version, articulating it in their reflections. Non-verbal practices are connected to the discourse-analysis of the Russian aggression against Ukraine — images, when the events of the war are framed by the screen through semantic images as a visual series, according to the time of their progress. War as an event in specific circumstances and time is considered through the concept of \"split Reality of the screen mirror\", transformed into a collage of continuous replacements of \"real\" reality by constructed Reality.\nWithout claiming the transcendentality of the idea of the screen mirror as containing a semantic boundedness, we try to give epistemic significance to a greater extent not to images, forms of depicting war, but to the idea of the \"split Reality of the screen mirror\" as a semantic phenomenon.\nThe method of typology introduces a conceptual character — the figure of a media person as someone who has access to screen means of depicting the course of war, who is the culprit of the \"split reality of the screen mirror\" and fragments this mirror. Borrowed from Žižek's philosophical psychoanalysis, the concept of \"real\" reality\" made it possible to develop the problem of the existence of the truth of the event of war due to \"(dis)trust in the image\", which, in turn, raises the question — whether the screen image of war is an embodiment of the symbolic order.","PeriodicalId":338481,"journal":{"name":"The Culturology Ideas","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screen mirror: the fractured Reality of wartime\",\"authors\":\"H. Chmil\",\"doi\":\"10.37627/2311-9489-23-2023-1.8-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presented conceptualization of the discursive field of the screen mirror as a reflection of the Reality of Russia's war against Ukraine fits into the situation of the presence of multiple discourses of this war, where each author builds their own version, articulating it in their reflections. Non-verbal practices are connected to the discourse-analysis of the Russian aggression against Ukraine — images, when the events of the war are framed by the screen through semantic images as a visual series, according to the time of their progress. War as an event in specific circumstances and time is considered through the concept of \\\"split Reality of the screen mirror\\\", transformed into a collage of continuous replacements of \\\"real\\\" reality by constructed Reality.\\nWithout claiming the transcendentality of the idea of the screen mirror as containing a semantic boundedness, we try to give epistemic significance to a greater extent not to images, forms of depicting war, but to the idea of the \\\"split Reality of the screen mirror\\\" as a semantic phenomenon.\\nThe method of typology introduces a conceptual character — the figure of a media person as someone who has access to screen means of depicting the course of war, who is the culprit of the \\\"split reality of the screen mirror\\\" and fragments this mirror. Borrowed from Žižek's philosophical psychoanalysis, the concept of \\\"real\\\" reality\\\" made it possible to develop the problem of the existence of the truth of the event of war due to \\\"(dis)trust in the image\\\", which, in turn, raises the question — whether the screen image of war is an embodiment of the symbolic order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Culturology Ideas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Culturology Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-23-2023-1.8-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Culturology Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-23-2023-1.8-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为俄罗斯对乌克兰战争现实的反映,屏幕镜子的话语领域的概念化符合这场战争的多重话语存在的情况,每个作者都建立了自己的版本,在他们的反思中表达出来。非语言实践与俄罗斯侵略乌克兰的话语分析-图像相关联,当战争事件根据其进展时间通过语义图像被屏幕框架为视觉系列时。战争作为一个特定环境和时间中的事件,通过“屏幕镜子的分裂现实”的概念被考虑,转化为一种拼贴,通过构建的现实不断替换“真实”的现实。我们不主张屏镜概念包含语义界限的先验性,而是试图在更大程度上赋予“屏镜的分裂现实”这一概念作为语义现象的认知意义,而不是赋予描绘战争的图像和形式。类型学的方法引入了一个概念性的人物——媒体人的形象,作为一个可以接触到屏幕的人来描绘战争的过程,他是“屏幕镜像分裂现实”的罪魁祸首,并将这面镜子碎片化。借用Žižek的哲学精神分析,“真实的”现实“的概念使得由于“(不信任)图像”而导致的战争事件真相的存在问题成为可能,这反过来又提出了一个问题-战争的屏幕图像是否是象征秩序的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screen mirror: the fractured Reality of wartime
The presented conceptualization of the discursive field of the screen mirror as a reflection of the Reality of Russia's war against Ukraine fits into the situation of the presence of multiple discourses of this war, where each author builds their own version, articulating it in their reflections. Non-verbal practices are connected to the discourse-analysis of the Russian aggression against Ukraine — images, when the events of the war are framed by the screen through semantic images as a visual series, according to the time of their progress. War as an event in specific circumstances and time is considered through the concept of "split Reality of the screen mirror", transformed into a collage of continuous replacements of "real" reality by constructed Reality. Without claiming the transcendentality of the idea of the screen mirror as containing a semantic boundedness, we try to give epistemic significance to a greater extent not to images, forms of depicting war, but to the idea of the "split Reality of the screen mirror" as a semantic phenomenon. The method of typology introduces a conceptual character — the figure of a media person as someone who has access to screen means of depicting the course of war, who is the culprit of the "split reality of the screen mirror" and fragments this mirror. Borrowed from Žižek's philosophical psychoanalysis, the concept of "real" reality" made it possible to develop the problem of the existence of the truth of the event of war due to "(dis)trust in the image", which, in turn, raises the question — whether the screen image of war is an embodiment of the symbolic order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信