图像去模糊技术的评估与评价研究

Roxanne A. Pagaduan, M. C. C. Aragon, Ruji P. Medina
{"title":"图像去模糊技术的评估与评价研究","authors":"Roxanne A. Pagaduan, M. C. C. Aragon, Ruji P. Medina","doi":"10.1109/TIME-E47986.2019.9353296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality of images used in a variety of systems contributes to the success of discovering beneficial details used in different fields of computing. The quality of the image plays a vital role in increasing the success rate of image recognition and related fields. Image quality can be degraded due to distortion, imperfection during image capture, inappropriate light balancing, and exposure to name a few. Various deblurring techniques were introduced to address blurred issues, transforming an image to lesser imperfections, successfully reading and/or identifying available details on it. This study aims to identify, define, and evaluate deblurring techniques in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs involved in the design. Significantly, the study compares various techniques that can be used to recover hidden details in the presence of image noise. The MA TLAB was used as a tool for testing and evaluating the deblurring techniques. PSNR, MSE, and computational time were used to compare each identified deblurring techniques. Based on the comparative performance results of each technique, in terms of accuracy measure, Lucy-Richardson got the highest PSNR ratio of 25.8312 that leads the best result while wiener filter got the lowest PSNR ratio of 21.3012. While, based on the MSE results, Wiener Filter got a higher rate of 0.0074; while blind deconvolution and Lucy-Richardson got the lowest value of 0.0026. And in terms of execution time, Wiener Filter performs the fastest computational time.","PeriodicalId":345220,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering & Environment (TIME-E)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iDeBlurInfo: An Assessment and Evaluation Study of Image Deblurring Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Roxanne A. Pagaduan, M. C. C. Aragon, Ruji P. Medina\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIME-E47986.2019.9353296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quality of images used in a variety of systems contributes to the success of discovering beneficial details used in different fields of computing. The quality of the image plays a vital role in increasing the success rate of image recognition and related fields. Image quality can be degraded due to distortion, imperfection during image capture, inappropriate light balancing, and exposure to name a few. Various deblurring techniques were introduced to address blurred issues, transforming an image to lesser imperfections, successfully reading and/or identifying available details on it. This study aims to identify, define, and evaluate deblurring techniques in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs involved in the design. Significantly, the study compares various techniques that can be used to recover hidden details in the presence of image noise. The MA TLAB was used as a tool for testing and evaluating the deblurring techniques. PSNR, MSE, and computational time were used to compare each identified deblurring techniques. Based on the comparative performance results of each technique, in terms of accuracy measure, Lucy-Richardson got the highest PSNR ratio of 25.8312 that leads the best result while wiener filter got the lowest PSNR ratio of 21.3012. While, based on the MSE results, Wiener Filter got a higher rate of 0.0074; while blind deconvolution and Lucy-Richardson got the lowest value of 0.0026. And in terms of execution time, Wiener Filter performs the fastest computational time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering & Environment (TIME-E)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering & Environment (TIME-E)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME-E47986.2019.9353296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering & Environment (TIME-E)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME-E47986.2019.9353296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在各种系统中使用的图像质量有助于成功地发现在不同计算领域中使用的有益细节。图像的质量对提高图像识别及相关领域的成功率起着至关重要的作用。图像质量可能会因图像捕获过程中的失真、不完美、不适当的光平衡和曝光等原因而降低。引入了各种去模糊技术来解决模糊问题,将图像转换为较小的缺陷,成功地读取和/或识别图像上的可用细节。本研究旨在识别、定义和评估去模糊技术,以一种展示对设计中涉及的权衡的理解的方式。值得注意的是,该研究比较了可用于在存在图像噪声的情况下恢复隐藏细节的各种技术。MA TLAB被用作测试和评估去模糊技术的工具。使用PSNR, MSE和计算时间来比较每种识别的去模糊技术。从各技术的性能对比结果来看,在精度度量方面,Lucy-Richardson的PSNR最高,达到25.8312,领先于其他技术,而wiener filter的PSNR最低,为21.3012。而从MSE结果来看,Wiener Filter的准确率更高,为0.0074;而盲反褶积和Lucy-Richardson得到的最小值为0.0026。在执行时间方面,维纳滤波器执行最快的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
iDeBlurInfo: An Assessment and Evaluation Study of Image Deblurring Techniques
Quality of images used in a variety of systems contributes to the success of discovering beneficial details used in different fields of computing. The quality of the image plays a vital role in increasing the success rate of image recognition and related fields. Image quality can be degraded due to distortion, imperfection during image capture, inappropriate light balancing, and exposure to name a few. Various deblurring techniques were introduced to address blurred issues, transforming an image to lesser imperfections, successfully reading and/or identifying available details on it. This study aims to identify, define, and evaluate deblurring techniques in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs involved in the design. Significantly, the study compares various techniques that can be used to recover hidden details in the presence of image noise. The MA TLAB was used as a tool for testing and evaluating the deblurring techniques. PSNR, MSE, and computational time were used to compare each identified deblurring techniques. Based on the comparative performance results of each technique, in terms of accuracy measure, Lucy-Richardson got the highest PSNR ratio of 25.8312 that leads the best result while wiener filter got the lowest PSNR ratio of 21.3012. While, based on the MSE results, Wiener Filter got a higher rate of 0.0074; while blind deconvolution and Lucy-Richardson got the lowest value of 0.0026. And in terms of execution time, Wiener Filter performs the fastest computational time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信