全球环境政治与发展中国家气候脆弱性关系:系统回顾与元分析

Anutosh Das
{"title":"全球环境政治与发展中国家气候脆弱性关系:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Anutosh Das","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3641773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change is arguably one of the most formidable environmental problems the world is facing nowadays and global environmental politics apprehends the complications further given its interdisciplinary nature and the scientific difficulties involved in climate change. Bangladesh has been recognized as one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change as per the Global Climate Risk Index (GCRI) 2018 at global stage emitting only 0.36 percent Greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, per-fluorocarbon, hydro-fluorocarbon, and sulfur hexafluoride) of total global GHG emission, which is lower than most of the countries. A paradox is felt across the globe is that the five major GHG emitting countries emit more than 60 percent of total global GHG emission but are not facing immediate climate risks. While on the contrary, countries like Bangladesh, Maldives, Lesotho or Tuvalu have little to do with GHG emissions but are most exposed to the long-term adverse impact of climate change. More to add, the most exposed countries to climate change are mostly developing or least developed and cannot fund their plans to fight out the climate change. In this global context, the countries at apex climatic risk despite demanding adequate financial support are not getting though. Being devoid of proper assistance from global community, they are getting more exposed to the climatic consequences and rushing to a possible extinction from the world map. This is being realized the most after a major GHG emitting country left Paris Agreement in 2017, believed to be influenced by international environmental politics, to pursue some short-term benefits leaving the long-term goals, and also has vowed to restructure the carbon regulations imposed by the previous administration. With the withdrawal of such a strong economic power from the agreement that pledged 3 billion dollars to the UN Green Climate Fund, at least two-thirds of the pledged amount is at Proceeding, International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-2019), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 01-03 March, 2019 risk. Also, with the proposed restructuring of the carbon regulations, the global target to reduce carbon emission is expected to receive a major blow. This paper will explore the nexus between nature of global environmental politics and its implications on climate-vulnerable nation's as well as act as a future guideline toward the practitioners and nationwide policymakers in mainstreaming the inclusive resilience issues for the safeguard of the climatic hazard prone third world countries.","PeriodicalId":308822,"journal":{"name":"Water Sustainability eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Environmental Politics and Developing Nations' Climatic Vulnerability Nexus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anutosh Das\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3641773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate change is arguably one of the most formidable environmental problems the world is facing nowadays and global environmental politics apprehends the complications further given its interdisciplinary nature and the scientific difficulties involved in climate change. Bangladesh has been recognized as one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change as per the Global Climate Risk Index (GCRI) 2018 at global stage emitting only 0.36 percent Greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, per-fluorocarbon, hydro-fluorocarbon, and sulfur hexafluoride) of total global GHG emission, which is lower than most of the countries. A paradox is felt across the globe is that the five major GHG emitting countries emit more than 60 percent of total global GHG emission but are not facing immediate climate risks. While on the contrary, countries like Bangladesh, Maldives, Lesotho or Tuvalu have little to do with GHG emissions but are most exposed to the long-term adverse impact of climate change. More to add, the most exposed countries to climate change are mostly developing or least developed and cannot fund their plans to fight out the climate change. In this global context, the countries at apex climatic risk despite demanding adequate financial support are not getting though. Being devoid of proper assistance from global community, they are getting more exposed to the climatic consequences and rushing to a possible extinction from the world map. This is being realized the most after a major GHG emitting country left Paris Agreement in 2017, believed to be influenced by international environmental politics, to pursue some short-term benefits leaving the long-term goals, and also has vowed to restructure the carbon regulations imposed by the previous administration. With the withdrawal of such a strong economic power from the agreement that pledged 3 billion dollars to the UN Green Climate Fund, at least two-thirds of the pledged amount is at Proceeding, International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-2019), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 01-03 March, 2019 risk. Also, with the proposed restructuring of the carbon regulations, the global target to reduce carbon emission is expected to receive a major blow. This paper will explore the nexus between nature of global environmental politics and its implications on climate-vulnerable nation's as well as act as a future guideline toward the practitioners and nationwide policymakers in mainstreaming the inclusive resilience issues for the safeguard of the climatic hazard prone third world countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Sustainability eJournal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Sustainability eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3641773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Sustainability eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3641773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

气候变化可以说是当今世界面临的最可怕的环境问题之一,鉴于其跨学科性质和气候变化所涉及的科学困难,全球环境政治进一步理解其复杂性。根据2018年全球气候风险指数(GCRI),孟加拉国被认为是受气候变化影响最脆弱的国家之一,其温室气体(二氧化碳、甲烷、一氧化二氮、全氟碳化合物、氢氟碳化合物和六氟化硫)的排放量仅占全球温室气体排放总量的0.36%,低于大多数国家。全球都能感受到一个悖论,即五大温室气体排放国的温室气体排放量占全球总排放量的60%以上,但却没有面临迫在眉睫的气候风险。与此相反,孟加拉国、马尔代夫、莱索托或图瓦卢等国与温室气体排放关系不大,但却最容易受到气候变化的长期不利影响。更重要的是,受气候变化影响最大的国家大多是发展中国家或最不发达国家,它们无法为应对气候变化的计划提供资金。在这种全球背景下,处于气候风险顶端的国家尽管要求获得足够的财政支持,但却没有得到通过。由于缺乏国际社会的适当援助,它们越来越容易受到气候后果的影响,并可能从世界地图上消失。这是在2017年一个主要温室气体排放国退出《巴黎协定》后实现的,据信这是受国际环境政治的影响,为了追求一些短期利益而放弃长期目标,并发誓要重组上届政府实施的碳监管。随着这样一个强大的经济大国退出承诺向联合国绿色气候基金提供30亿美元的协议,至少三分之二的承诺金额将在2019年3月1日至3日在孟加拉国达卡举行的国际气候变化会议(ICCC-2019)上进行。此外,随着碳排放法规的调整,预计全球碳减排目标将受到重大打击。本文将探讨全球环境政治的本质及其对气候脆弱国家的影响之间的联系,并作为未来的指导方针,指导实践者和全国政策制定者将包容性弹性问题纳入主流,以保护易受气候灾害影响的第三世界国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Environmental Politics and Developing Nations' Climatic Vulnerability Nexus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Climate change is arguably one of the most formidable environmental problems the world is facing nowadays and global environmental politics apprehends the complications further given its interdisciplinary nature and the scientific difficulties involved in climate change. Bangladesh has been recognized as one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change as per the Global Climate Risk Index (GCRI) 2018 at global stage emitting only 0.36 percent Greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, per-fluorocarbon, hydro-fluorocarbon, and sulfur hexafluoride) of total global GHG emission, which is lower than most of the countries. A paradox is felt across the globe is that the five major GHG emitting countries emit more than 60 percent of total global GHG emission but are not facing immediate climate risks. While on the contrary, countries like Bangladesh, Maldives, Lesotho or Tuvalu have little to do with GHG emissions but are most exposed to the long-term adverse impact of climate change. More to add, the most exposed countries to climate change are mostly developing or least developed and cannot fund their plans to fight out the climate change. In this global context, the countries at apex climatic risk despite demanding adequate financial support are not getting though. Being devoid of proper assistance from global community, they are getting more exposed to the climatic consequences and rushing to a possible extinction from the world map. This is being realized the most after a major GHG emitting country left Paris Agreement in 2017, believed to be influenced by international environmental politics, to pursue some short-term benefits leaving the long-term goals, and also has vowed to restructure the carbon regulations imposed by the previous administration. With the withdrawal of such a strong economic power from the agreement that pledged 3 billion dollars to the UN Green Climate Fund, at least two-thirds of the pledged amount is at Proceeding, International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-2019), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 01-03 March, 2019 risk. Also, with the proposed restructuring of the carbon regulations, the global target to reduce carbon emission is expected to receive a major blow. This paper will explore the nexus between nature of global environmental politics and its implications on climate-vulnerable nation's as well as act as a future guideline toward the practitioners and nationwide policymakers in mainstreaming the inclusive resilience issues for the safeguard of the climatic hazard prone third world countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信