التبادلوالتكاملبينالثقافتينالصينيةوالعربيةالوسطيوالتوفيقيةمنمنظور- Inter-communication阿拉伯和中国之间互助参考古代近东文明视角》:改编自金和Conciliation均值

Wu Minyan
{"title":"التبادلوالتكاملبينالثقافتينالصينيةوالعربيةالوسطيوالتوفيقيةمنمنظور- Inter-communication阿拉伯和中国之间互助参考古代近东文明视角》:改编自金和Conciliation均值","authors":"Wu Minyan","doi":"10.1515/caas-2022-2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The two ideas of moderation and syncretism are among the most distinctive ideas about the Chinese and Arab cultures, as they are similar in many aspects, such as the historical ground of their formation and development, the problems they are trying to address and the questions they raise, and moral, spirit and values that can be read through them. Comparing these two ideas contributes to a deep understanding of the values and ideas they share, as this comparison provides a solid basis for achieving exchange and integration between them. This kind of communication and exchange is particularly urgent in the context of realizing the “Belt and Road” slogan and the slogan of “A common future for mankind.” At the same time, it is necessary to recognize the differences between the two cultures when making the comparison, so the path leading to the integration of the Chinese and Arab cultures must be through adherence to the ideas of mutual understanding and openness advocated by both moderation and syncreticism, with awareness of their own identity.","PeriodicalId":314107,"journal":{"name":"Chinese and Arab Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"التبادل والتكامل بين الثقافتين الصينية والعربية الوسطي والتوفيقية من منظور / Inter-communication and Mutual Reference Between Chinese and Arab Civilizations: Based on the Perspective of the Golden Mean and Conciliation\",\"authors\":\"Wu Minyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/caas-2022-2001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The two ideas of moderation and syncretism are among the most distinctive ideas about the Chinese and Arab cultures, as they are similar in many aspects, such as the historical ground of their formation and development, the problems they are trying to address and the questions they raise, and moral, spirit and values that can be read through them. Comparing these two ideas contributes to a deep understanding of the values and ideas they share, as this comparison provides a solid basis for achieving exchange and integration between them. This kind of communication and exchange is particularly urgent in the context of realizing the “Belt and Road” slogan and the slogan of “A common future for mankind.” At the same time, it is necessary to recognize the differences between the two cultures when making the comparison, so the path leading to the integration of the Chinese and Arab cultures must be through adherence to the ideas of mutual understanding and openness advocated by both moderation and syncreticism, with awareness of their own identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese and Arab Studies\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese and Arab Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/caas-2022-2001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese and Arab Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/caas-2022-2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中庸思想和融合思想是中阿两国文化中最具特色的思想之一,它们在形成和发展的历史基础、所要解决的问题和所提出的问题以及从中可以解读的道德、精神和价值观等诸多方面都有相似之处。比较这两种思想有助于深入理解他们共同的价值观和思想,这种比较为他们之间的交流和融合提供了坚实的基础。在实现“一带一路”口号和“人类共同未来”口号的背景下,这种沟通与交流显得尤为迫切。同时,在进行比较的同时,也需要认识到两种文化的差异,因此,通往中阿文化融合的道路必须是坚持中庸与融合所倡导的相互理解和开放的思想,并意识到自己的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
التبادل والتكامل بين الثقافتين الصينية والعربية الوسطي والتوفيقية من منظور / Inter-communication and Mutual Reference Between Chinese and Arab Civilizations: Based on the Perspective of the Golden Mean and Conciliation
Abstract The two ideas of moderation and syncretism are among the most distinctive ideas about the Chinese and Arab cultures, as they are similar in many aspects, such as the historical ground of their formation and development, the problems they are trying to address and the questions they raise, and moral, spirit and values that can be read through them. Comparing these two ideas contributes to a deep understanding of the values and ideas they share, as this comparison provides a solid basis for achieving exchange and integration between them. This kind of communication and exchange is particularly urgent in the context of realizing the “Belt and Road” slogan and the slogan of “A common future for mankind.” At the same time, it is necessary to recognize the differences between the two cultures when making the comparison, so the path leading to the integration of the Chinese and Arab cultures must be through adherence to the ideas of mutual understanding and openness advocated by both moderation and syncreticism, with awareness of their own identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信