Y. Molina, L. S. Miguel, Lizeth I. Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Peña, A. Lucio, O. Hernandez, J. Arroyo, M. Medina, N. Coronado
{"title":"B25:授权拉丁裔获得乳腺癌筛查:比较干预效果,第1部分","authors":"Y. Molina, L. S. Miguel, Lizeth I. Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Peña, A. Lucio, O. Hernandez, J. Arroyo, M. Medina, N. Coronado","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Latinas suffer disproportionately from breast cancer relative to non-Latina Whites (NLWs), partially due to lower guideline-concordant screening. In response, a significant body of work first sought to characterize disparities and associated determinants. Second, multiple approaches were developed to address this disparity, including community health worker (CHW)-driven education to the target population and empowerment interventions, wherein CHWs train a subset of the population to disseminate education to other members of the target population and mobilize in the context of health. The next logical step is to compare the relative effectiveness of interventions for future large-scaled implementation. Objective: We report emerging evidence from an ongoing, quasi-experimental trial that compares the effects of education and empowerment approaches on Latinas who are nonadherent to US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening guidelines. Methods: The setting for this trial is in two Latino, lower-income communities in Chicago (Pilsen/Little Village, East Side/Chicago). Women are recruited via two community-based organizations (The Resurrection Project, Centro Comunitario Juan Diego) and snowball sampling. Eligibility criteria include: 1) age of 50-74; 2) lack of screening within past 2 years; 3) no previous breast cancer diagnosis; and 4) no prior health volunteerism experience. After screening and providing informed consent, women are assigned to a cohort (6-10 sessions) and participate in a three-week intervention (three 2-hour sessions). The education intervention is administered in East Side/Chicago and the empowerment intervention is administered in Pilsen/South Chicago to avoid contamination effects. The education intervention consists of a session focused on breast cancer and methods of early detection, a session focused on diet as a method of prevention, and a session focused on physical activity as a method of prevention. The empowerment intervention consists of a session focused on breast cancer and methods of early detection, a session focused on one-on-one conversations with family and friends about breast cancer, and a session focused on health-related volunteerism. For women who wish to obtain mammography (from either arm), study team provides navigation to free/low-cost services and tracks participants throughout the continuum of care. Three questionnaires are given: baseline (before Session #1), postintervention (after Session #3), and a follow-up (6 months after Session #3). Receipt of screening is confirmed by study and medical records for women who have completed HIPAA forms. Participants are compensated $80 for their participation. As well, during and after the intervention, participants may refer other nonadherent Latinas to the study for a small incentive ($15). Results: Our current sample is 37 women (20 education; 17 empowerment). The average age was 61.62 years old (SD = 6.02). Approximately 89% of participants were born in Mexico and approximately 81% had less than a high school education. The median annual household income was Discussion: Preliminary findings suggest the empowerment approach may be more effective in promoting breast cancer screening among nonadherent Latinas and disseminating information to their peers. Limitations concern generalizability due to a non-probability based sample and limited ability for causal inferences due to a lack of randomization. Next steps include comparing receipt of screening and characterizing diffusion of information throughout participants9 social networks. Citation Format: Yamile Molina, Liliana G. San Miguel, Lizeth Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Pena, Araceli Lucio, Oliva Hernandez, Juanita Arroyo, Maria C. Medina, Nora Coronado. Empowering Latinas to obtain breast cancer screenings: Comparing intervention effects, part 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B25.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B25: Empowering Latinas to obtain breast cancer screenings: Comparing intervention effects, part 1\",\"authors\":\"Y. Molina, L. S. Miguel, Lizeth I. Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Peña, A. Lucio, O. Hernandez, J. Arroyo, M. Medina, N. Coronado\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Latinas suffer disproportionately from breast cancer relative to non-Latina Whites (NLWs), partially due to lower guideline-concordant screening. In response, a significant body of work first sought to characterize disparities and associated determinants. Second, multiple approaches were developed to address this disparity, including community health worker (CHW)-driven education to the target population and empowerment interventions, wherein CHWs train a subset of the population to disseminate education to other members of the target population and mobilize in the context of health. The next logical step is to compare the relative effectiveness of interventions for future large-scaled implementation. Objective: We report emerging evidence from an ongoing, quasi-experimental trial that compares the effects of education and empowerment approaches on Latinas who are nonadherent to US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening guidelines. Methods: The setting for this trial is in two Latino, lower-income communities in Chicago (Pilsen/Little Village, East Side/Chicago). Women are recruited via two community-based organizations (The Resurrection Project, Centro Comunitario Juan Diego) and snowball sampling. Eligibility criteria include: 1) age of 50-74; 2) lack of screening within past 2 years; 3) no previous breast cancer diagnosis; and 4) no prior health volunteerism experience. After screening and providing informed consent, women are assigned to a cohort (6-10 sessions) and participate in a three-week intervention (three 2-hour sessions). The education intervention is administered in East Side/Chicago and the empowerment intervention is administered in Pilsen/South Chicago to avoid contamination effects. The education intervention consists of a session focused on breast cancer and methods of early detection, a session focused on diet as a method of prevention, and a session focused on physical activity as a method of prevention. The empowerment intervention consists of a session focused on breast cancer and methods of early detection, a session focused on one-on-one conversations with family and friends about breast cancer, and a session focused on health-related volunteerism. For women who wish to obtain mammography (from either arm), study team provides navigation to free/low-cost services and tracks participants throughout the continuum of care. Three questionnaires are given: baseline (before Session #1), postintervention (after Session #3), and a follow-up (6 months after Session #3). Receipt of screening is confirmed by study and medical records for women who have completed HIPAA forms. Participants are compensated $80 for their participation. As well, during and after the intervention, participants may refer other nonadherent Latinas to the study for a small incentive ($15). Results: Our current sample is 37 women (20 education; 17 empowerment). The average age was 61.62 years old (SD = 6.02). Approximately 89% of participants were born in Mexico and approximately 81% had less than a high school education. The median annual household income was Discussion: Preliminary findings suggest the empowerment approach may be more effective in promoting breast cancer screening among nonadherent Latinas and disseminating information to their peers. Limitations concern generalizability due to a non-probability based sample and limited ability for causal inferences due to a lack of randomization. Next steps include comparing receipt of screening and characterizing diffusion of information throughout participants9 social networks. Citation Format: Yamile Molina, Liliana G. San Miguel, Lizeth Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Pena, Araceli Lucio, Oliva Hernandez, Juanita Arroyo, Maria C. Medina, Nora Coronado. Empowering Latinas to obtain breast cancer screenings: Comparing intervention effects, part 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B25.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:与非拉丁裔白人(NLWs)相比,拉丁裔患乳腺癌的比例不成比例,部分原因是低指南一致性筛查。作为回应,大量的工作首先试图描述差异和相关的决定因素。其次,制定了多种方法来解决这一差距,包括社区卫生工作者(CHW)推动的目标人口教育和赋权干预,其中社区卫生工作者培训一部分人口向目标人口的其他成员传播教育,并在卫生方面进行动员。下一个合乎逻辑的步骤是比较未来大规模实施的干预措施的相对有效性。目的:我们报告了一项正在进行的准实验试验的新证据,该试验比较了教育和赋权方法对不遵守美国预防服务工作组乳腺癌筛查指南的拉丁裔人的影响。方法:本试验设置在芝加哥的两个拉丁裔低收入社区(皮尔森/小村庄,东区/芝加哥)。妇女是通过两个社区组织(复活项目、胡安·迭戈社区中心)和滚雪球抽样来招募的。资格标准包括:1)年龄50-74岁;2)近2年内未进行筛查;3)既往无乳腺癌诊断;4)无卫生志愿服务经验。在筛选并提供知情同意后,将妇女分配到一个队列(6-10次),并参加为期三周的干预(三次2小时的干预)。教育干预在芝加哥东区进行,授权干预在芝加哥南部的皮尔森进行,以避免污染影响。教育干预包括以乳腺癌和早期检测方法为重点的一次会议、以饮食作为预防方法为重点的一次会议和以体育活动作为预防方法为重点的一次会议。增强权能的干预措施包括一个侧重于乳腺癌和早期发现方法的会议,一个侧重于与家人和朋友就乳腺癌进行一对一对话的会议,以及一个侧重于与健康有关的志愿服务的会议。对于希望获得乳房x光检查的妇女(从任何手臂),研究小组提供免费/低成本服务的导航,并在整个护理过程中跟踪参与者。提供三份问卷:基线(第1次治疗前)、干预后(第3次治疗后)和随访(第3次治疗后6个月)。完成HIPAA表格的妇女的研究和医疗记录证实接受了筛查。参与者将获得80美元的报酬。同样,在干预期间和之后,参与者可能会推荐其他不坚持的拉丁裔人参与这项研究,以获得小额奖励(15美元)。结果:我们目前的样本是37名女性(20名受过教育;17授权)。平均年龄61.62岁(SD = 6.02)。大约89%的参与者出生在墨西哥,大约81%的人受教育程度低于高中。讨论:初步研究结果表明,授权方法在促进非依从性拉丁裔乳腺癌筛查和向同龄人传播信息方面可能更有效。局限性涉及由于非基于概率的样本的泛化性和由于缺乏随机化而限制的因果推断能力。接下来的步骤包括比较接收筛选和特征的信息在参与者的社会网络的扩散。引文格式:Yamile Molina, Liliana G. San Miguel, Lizeth Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Pena, Araceli Lucio, Oliva Hernandez, Juanita Arroyo, Maria C. Medina, Nora Coronado。授权拉丁裔获得乳腺癌筛查:比较干预效果,第1部分[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr B25。
Abstract B25: Empowering Latinas to obtain breast cancer screenings: Comparing intervention effects, part 1
Purpose: Latinas suffer disproportionately from breast cancer relative to non-Latina Whites (NLWs), partially due to lower guideline-concordant screening. In response, a significant body of work first sought to characterize disparities and associated determinants. Second, multiple approaches were developed to address this disparity, including community health worker (CHW)-driven education to the target population and empowerment interventions, wherein CHWs train a subset of the population to disseminate education to other members of the target population and mobilize in the context of health. The next logical step is to compare the relative effectiveness of interventions for future large-scaled implementation. Objective: We report emerging evidence from an ongoing, quasi-experimental trial that compares the effects of education and empowerment approaches on Latinas who are nonadherent to US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening guidelines. Methods: The setting for this trial is in two Latino, lower-income communities in Chicago (Pilsen/Little Village, East Side/Chicago). Women are recruited via two community-based organizations (The Resurrection Project, Centro Comunitario Juan Diego) and snowball sampling. Eligibility criteria include: 1) age of 50-74; 2) lack of screening within past 2 years; 3) no previous breast cancer diagnosis; and 4) no prior health volunteerism experience. After screening and providing informed consent, women are assigned to a cohort (6-10 sessions) and participate in a three-week intervention (three 2-hour sessions). The education intervention is administered in East Side/Chicago and the empowerment intervention is administered in Pilsen/South Chicago to avoid contamination effects. The education intervention consists of a session focused on breast cancer and methods of early detection, a session focused on diet as a method of prevention, and a session focused on physical activity as a method of prevention. The empowerment intervention consists of a session focused on breast cancer and methods of early detection, a session focused on one-on-one conversations with family and friends about breast cancer, and a session focused on health-related volunteerism. For women who wish to obtain mammography (from either arm), study team provides navigation to free/low-cost services and tracks participants throughout the continuum of care. Three questionnaires are given: baseline (before Session #1), postintervention (after Session #3), and a follow-up (6 months after Session #3). Receipt of screening is confirmed by study and medical records for women who have completed HIPAA forms. Participants are compensated $80 for their participation. As well, during and after the intervention, participants may refer other nonadherent Latinas to the study for a small incentive ($15). Results: Our current sample is 37 women (20 education; 17 empowerment). The average age was 61.62 years old (SD = 6.02). Approximately 89% of participants were born in Mexico and approximately 81% had less than a high school education. The median annual household income was Discussion: Preliminary findings suggest the empowerment approach may be more effective in promoting breast cancer screening among nonadherent Latinas and disseminating information to their peers. Limitations concern generalizability due to a non-probability based sample and limited ability for causal inferences due to a lack of randomization. Next steps include comparing receipt of screening and characterizing diffusion of information throughout participants9 social networks. Citation Format: Yamile Molina, Liliana G. San Miguel, Lizeth Tamayo, Sylvia Gonzalez, Rosa de la Torre, Kryztal Pena, Araceli Lucio, Oliva Hernandez, Juanita Arroyo, Maria C. Medina, Nora Coronado. Empowering Latinas to obtain breast cancer screenings: Comparing intervention effects, part 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B25.