Izabela Poręba
{"title":"Historia, problematyka i związki studiów postkolonialnych z badaniami kultury popularnej","authors":"Izabela Poręba","doi":"10.19195/0867-7441.27.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article depicts the connectivity of popular culture studies in the field of cultural studies with issues of postcolonial studies. The aim of the work is to answer the question about a possibility to transplant Western cultural studies research to postcolonial popular culture analysis and interpretation. The study begins with a brief reconstruction of the history of pop culture research in the scope of postcolonial methodology — the most important works, conferences, and thematic issues initiating an interest in a research field new to postcolonialism around the 1990s and at the beginning of the following millennium. In the next part of the article, the author points out two main definitions of popular culture (“the popular”) in the scope of indicated optics — by Stuart Hall and John Fiske; the author also considers terminological issues with “the popular” and its non-existent equivalent in Polish. An ambiguous movement written in popular culture was considered as its most important feature (as Hall and Fiske claimed) — at the same time, a dominant system is contained (incorporation) and meets with resistance of people who revolt by the means of the system itself (exportation). Nonetheless, the author shows why believing in the possibility of resistance can be an illusion. Next, the author comments on the stand of Kwame Anthony Appiah, who problematized the relation of postcolonialism and pop culture. The analysis of connections between these two phenomena is followed by a few examples of intertextuality in Alain Mabanckou’s novels.","PeriodicalId":141509,"journal":{"name":"Literatura i Kultura Popularna","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura i Kultura Popularna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/0867-7441.27.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了文化研究领域的大众文化研究与后殖民研究问题的联系。这项工作的目的是回答关于将西方文化研究移植到后殖民流行文化分析和解释的可能性的问题。本研究首先对后殖民方法论范围内流行文化研究的历史进行了简要的重建——在20世纪90年代和下一个千年之初,最重要的作品、会议和主题问题引发了人们对后殖民主义新研究领域的兴趣。在文章的下一部分,作者指出了在指示光学范围内流行文化(“大众”)的两种主要定义——斯图尔特·霍尔和约翰·菲斯克;作者还考虑了“大众”和波兰语中不存在的对应词的术语问题。一个写在大众文化中的模棱两可的运动被认为是其最重要的特征(正如霍尔和菲斯克所声称的那样)——同时,一个主导的系统被包含(合并),并遇到了通过系统本身反抗的人们的抵抗(输出)。尽管如此,作者还是说明了为什么相信抵抗的可能性可能是一种错觉。其次,作者对夸梅·安东尼·阿皮亚提出的后殖民主义与流行文化关系问题的观点进行了评述。在分析这两种现象之间的联系之后,本文列举了阿兰·马班库小说中互文性的几个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historia, problematyka i związki studiów postkolonialnych z badaniami kultury popularnej
The article depicts the connectivity of popular culture studies in the field of cultural studies with issues of postcolonial studies. The aim of the work is to answer the question about a possibility to transplant Western cultural studies research to postcolonial popular culture analysis and interpretation. The study begins with a brief reconstruction of the history of pop culture research in the scope of postcolonial methodology — the most important works, conferences, and thematic issues initiating an interest in a research field new to postcolonialism around the 1990s and at the beginning of the following millennium. In the next part of the article, the author points out two main definitions of popular culture (“the popular”) in the scope of indicated optics — by Stuart Hall and John Fiske; the author also considers terminological issues with “the popular” and its non-existent equivalent in Polish. An ambiguous movement written in popular culture was considered as its most important feature (as Hall and Fiske claimed) — at the same time, a dominant system is contained (incorporation) and meets with resistance of people who revolt by the means of the system itself (exportation). Nonetheless, the author shows why believing in the possibility of resistance can be an illusion. Next, the author comments on the stand of Kwame Anthony Appiah, who problematized the relation of postcolonialism and pop culture. The analysis of connections between these two phenomena is followed by a few examples of intertextuality in Alain Mabanckou’s novels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信