质与量:翻转教学课堂的完成奖励与形成性评估

Kurt Schmitz
{"title":"质与量:翻转教学课堂的完成奖励与形成性评估","authors":"Kurt Schmitz","doi":"10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flipped instruction approaches are increasingly being applied to University curriculum (Akçayır & Akçayır 2018). Flipping the classroom moves events that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom to outside the classroom and vice versa (Lage et al. 2000). Content dissemination moves away from face-to-face hours and into online delivery outside of class, while face-to-face class time is used for practice and application (Hill 2012). A key factor influencing learning outcomes with flipped instruction is the amount of time students spend with the material outside of class (Lim & Morris 2009). Flipping the classroom assumes that students will take control of their learning in terms of pace of study, mastery of content, and coming to class prepared (Davies et al. 2013). Motivation plays a key role initiating and sustaining self-directed learning (Garrison 1997) and is positively associated with exam performance (Janssen & O’Brien 2014). In addition, lack of motivation is the major reason students drop out of online courses (Kim 2004). These self-directed learning insights have proven robust not only for MOOCs, but also online classes at community colleges and universities (Lee & Choi 2011; Levy 2007). This study examines two techniques aimed at student motivation for the outside-the-classroom portion of flipped instruction. The first is the use of Formative Assessments. The cognitive development literature reports that formative assessment feedback motivates deep learning (Higgins et al. 2002). Beyond motivation, formative assessments are often used by students to adjust their study process leading to improved learning outcomes (Cauley & McMillan 2010). The second tactic is the use of completion rewards tied to a desired behavior. In this study rewards are scores in an online gradebook. Students consistently report that grades are an overarching concern, such that all other goals are secondary (Pressley et al. 1998). In addition, knowing their progress and grades in a class may provide students a sense of satisfaction that motivates their effort (Docan 2006). There is very little rigorously designed research on flipped classroom approaches (Abeysekera & Dawson 2015). To partially address this gap, this study seeks to examine the effect of formative assessment completion scores for flipped instruction learning objectives. The following specific study questions are examined: Is Formative Assessment engagement associated with improved learning outcomes for outside the classroom flipped instruction content?","PeriodicalId":332019,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality or Quantity: Completion Rewards and Formative Assessments in Flipped Instruction Classes\",\"authors\":\"Kurt Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flipped instruction approaches are increasingly being applied to University curriculum (Akçayır & Akçayır 2018). Flipping the classroom moves events that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom to outside the classroom and vice versa (Lage et al. 2000). Content dissemination moves away from face-to-face hours and into online delivery outside of class, while face-to-face class time is used for practice and application (Hill 2012). A key factor influencing learning outcomes with flipped instruction is the amount of time students spend with the material outside of class (Lim & Morris 2009). Flipping the classroom assumes that students will take control of their learning in terms of pace of study, mastery of content, and coming to class prepared (Davies et al. 2013). Motivation plays a key role initiating and sustaining self-directed learning (Garrison 1997) and is positively associated with exam performance (Janssen & O’Brien 2014). In addition, lack of motivation is the major reason students drop out of online courses (Kim 2004). These self-directed learning insights have proven robust not only for MOOCs, but also online classes at community colleges and universities (Lee & Choi 2011; Levy 2007). This study examines two techniques aimed at student motivation for the outside-the-classroom portion of flipped instruction. The first is the use of Formative Assessments. The cognitive development literature reports that formative assessment feedback motivates deep learning (Higgins et al. 2002). Beyond motivation, formative assessments are often used by students to adjust their study process leading to improved learning outcomes (Cauley & McMillan 2010). The second tactic is the use of completion rewards tied to a desired behavior. In this study rewards are scores in an online gradebook. Students consistently report that grades are an overarching concern, such that all other goals are secondary (Pressley et al. 1998). In addition, knowing their progress and grades in a class may provide students a sense of satisfaction that motivates their effort (Docan 2006). There is very little rigorously designed research on flipped classroom approaches (Abeysekera & Dawson 2015). To partially address this gap, this study seeks to examine the effect of formative assessment completion scores for flipped instruction learning objectives. The following specific study questions are examined: Is Formative Assessment engagement associated with improved learning outcomes for outside the classroom flipped instruction content?\",\"PeriodicalId\":332019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

翻转教学方法越来越多地应用于大学课程(Akçayır & Akçayır 2018)。翻转课堂将传统上发生在课堂内的事件转移到课堂外,反之亦然(Lage et al. 2000)。内容传播从面对面的时间转移到课外的在线交付,而面对面的课堂时间用于实践和应用(Hill 2012)。影响翻转教学学习成果的一个关键因素是学生花在课外材料上的时间(Lim & Morris 2009)。翻转课堂假设学生将在学习速度、掌握内容和上课前做好准备方面控制自己的学习(Davies et al. 2013)。动机在启动和维持自主学习中起着关键作用(Garrison 1997),并与考试成绩呈正相关(Janssen & O 'Brien 2014)。此外,缺乏动力是学生退出网络课程的主要原因(Kim 2004)。事实证明,这些自主学习的见解不仅适用于mooc,也适用于社区学院和大学的在线课程(Lee & Choi 2011;征收2007)。本研究考察了两种旨在提高学生课堂外部分翻转教学动机的技巧。首先是形成性评估的使用。认知发展文献报告,形成性评估反馈激励深度学习(Higgins et al. 2002)。除了动机之外,学生还经常使用形成性评估来调整他们的学习过程,从而改善学习成果(Cauley & McMillan 2010)。第二种策略是将完成奖励与期望行为绑定在一起。在这项研究中,奖励是在线成绩单上的分数。学生们一致表示,成绩是最重要的,其他目标都是次要的(Pressley et al. 1998)。此外,了解自己在课堂上的进步和成绩可能会给学生提供一种满足感,从而激励他们努力学习(Docan 2006)。很少有严格设计的关于翻转课堂方法的研究(Abeysekera & Dawson 2015)。为了部分解决这一差距,本研究试图检验形成性评估完成分数对翻转教学目标的影响。以下具体的学习问题被检查:形成性评估参与与课堂外翻转教学内容的学习成果改善有关吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality or Quantity: Completion Rewards and Formative Assessments in Flipped Instruction Classes
Flipped instruction approaches are increasingly being applied to University curriculum (Akçayır & Akçayır 2018). Flipping the classroom moves events that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom to outside the classroom and vice versa (Lage et al. 2000). Content dissemination moves away from face-to-face hours and into online delivery outside of class, while face-to-face class time is used for practice and application (Hill 2012). A key factor influencing learning outcomes with flipped instruction is the amount of time students spend with the material outside of class (Lim & Morris 2009). Flipping the classroom assumes that students will take control of their learning in terms of pace of study, mastery of content, and coming to class prepared (Davies et al. 2013). Motivation plays a key role initiating and sustaining self-directed learning (Garrison 1997) and is positively associated with exam performance (Janssen & O’Brien 2014). In addition, lack of motivation is the major reason students drop out of online courses (Kim 2004). These self-directed learning insights have proven robust not only for MOOCs, but also online classes at community colleges and universities (Lee & Choi 2011; Levy 2007). This study examines two techniques aimed at student motivation for the outside-the-classroom portion of flipped instruction. The first is the use of Formative Assessments. The cognitive development literature reports that formative assessment feedback motivates deep learning (Higgins et al. 2002). Beyond motivation, formative assessments are often used by students to adjust their study process leading to improved learning outcomes (Cauley & McMillan 2010). The second tactic is the use of completion rewards tied to a desired behavior. In this study rewards are scores in an online gradebook. Students consistently report that grades are an overarching concern, such that all other goals are secondary (Pressley et al. 1998). In addition, knowing their progress and grades in a class may provide students a sense of satisfaction that motivates their effort (Docan 2006). There is very little rigorously designed research on flipped classroom approaches (Abeysekera & Dawson 2015). To partially address this gap, this study seeks to examine the effect of formative assessment completion scores for flipped instruction learning objectives. The following specific study questions are examined: Is Formative Assessment engagement associated with improved learning outcomes for outside the classroom flipped instruction content?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信