{"title":"比较常被执行的诊断和护士在客户身上预测的可能诊断与精神疾病之间的比较","authors":"Intan Nurjannah, D. Pamungkas, Sri Warsini","doi":"10.22146/jkkk.29011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is not enough information related to the accuracy of nursing and collaborative diagnoses established by nurses in psychiatric setting in Indonesia.Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the correspondence between nursing and collaborative diagnoses established and predicted by nurses.Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study which employed 81 nurse respondents. Data were collected in 2013 using two types of questionnaires. The rst questionnaire was used to identify the most frequent nursing and collaborative diagnoses encountered by the nurses. The second questionnaire was used to identify data which were most frequently identi ed by the nurses. The second questionnaire was developed based on the sequence in the Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Results: The results indicated that there were 46 nursing diagnosis labels established by the nurses. Of the 46 nursing diagnosis labels, only 13 (28.26%) corresponded precisely to the labels in North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) taxonomy (2012-2014) of nursing diagnoses. As many as 11 diagnoses (23.91%) could be included as key concepts (or diagnostic foci) in NANDA taxonomy. However, these nursing diagnosis labels did not written correctly as in NANDA labels. There were also 22 diagnosis (47%) labels not listed in NANDA taxonomy.Conclusion: The majority of nursing diagnosis labels did not match with nursing diagnosis labels in NANDA taxonomy. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Belum banyak informasi terkait akurasi diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang dibuat perawat dalam setting keperawatan jiwa di Indonesia.Tujuan: Tujuan dari peneltian ini untuk mengidenti kasi kesesuaian antara diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang sudah ditegakkan dan yang diduga oleh perawat. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan cross sectional yang melibatkan 81 responden perawat. Data dikumpulkan pada tahun 2013 menggunakan 2 kuesioner. Kuesioner pertama digunakan untuk mengetahui diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang paling sering ditegakkan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua digunakan untuk mengidenti kasi data yang paling sering ditemukan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua dikembangkan berdasarkan Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Hasil: Dari hasil penelitian didapati terdapat 46 label diagnosis keperawatan dibuat oleh perawat. Dari 46 label diagnosis keperawatan hanya 14 label diagnosis (28,26%) yang sesuai dengan label diagnosis berdasarkan taxonomi North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) (2012-2014). Sebanyak 11 diagnosis (23,91%) dapat tercakup sebagai konsep penting (atau fokus diagnostik) dalam taksonomi NANDA. Namun label diagnosis keperawatan tersebut tidak dituliskan secara benar sesuai label NANDA. Selain itu ada juga 22 label diagnosis yang dituliskan tidak sesuai taksonomi NANDA.Kesimpulan: Mayoritas label diagnosis keperawatan yang dituliskan perawat tidak sesuai dengan label diagnosis keperawatan dalam taksonomi NANDA.","PeriodicalId":287362,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbandingan Antara Diagnosis yang Sering Ditegakkan dan Possible Diagnosis yang Diprediksikan oleh Perawat Pada Klien dengan Gangguan Jiwa\",\"authors\":\"Intan Nurjannah, D. Pamungkas, Sri Warsini\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/jkkk.29011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is not enough information related to the accuracy of nursing and collaborative diagnoses established by nurses in psychiatric setting in Indonesia.Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the correspondence between nursing and collaborative diagnoses established and predicted by nurses.Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study which employed 81 nurse respondents. Data were collected in 2013 using two types of questionnaires. The rst questionnaire was used to identify the most frequent nursing and collaborative diagnoses encountered by the nurses. The second questionnaire was used to identify data which were most frequently identi ed by the nurses. The second questionnaire was developed based on the sequence in the Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Results: The results indicated that there were 46 nursing diagnosis labels established by the nurses. Of the 46 nursing diagnosis labels, only 13 (28.26%) corresponded precisely to the labels in North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) taxonomy (2012-2014) of nursing diagnoses. As many as 11 diagnoses (23.91%) could be included as key concepts (or diagnostic foci) in NANDA taxonomy. However, these nursing diagnosis labels did not written correctly as in NANDA labels. There were also 22 diagnosis (47%) labels not listed in NANDA taxonomy.Conclusion: The majority of nursing diagnosis labels did not match with nursing diagnosis labels in NANDA taxonomy. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Belum banyak informasi terkait akurasi diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang dibuat perawat dalam setting keperawatan jiwa di Indonesia.Tujuan: Tujuan dari peneltian ini untuk mengidenti kasi kesesuaian antara diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang sudah ditegakkan dan yang diduga oleh perawat. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan cross sectional yang melibatkan 81 responden perawat. Data dikumpulkan pada tahun 2013 menggunakan 2 kuesioner. Kuesioner pertama digunakan untuk mengetahui diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang paling sering ditegakkan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua digunakan untuk mengidenti kasi data yang paling sering ditemukan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua dikembangkan berdasarkan Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Hasil: Dari hasil penelitian didapati terdapat 46 label diagnosis keperawatan dibuat oleh perawat. Dari 46 label diagnosis keperawatan hanya 14 label diagnosis (28,26%) yang sesuai dengan label diagnosis berdasarkan taxonomi North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) (2012-2014). Sebanyak 11 diagnosis (23,91%) dapat tercakup sebagai konsep penting (atau fokus diagnostik) dalam taksonomi NANDA. Namun label diagnosis keperawatan tersebut tidak dituliskan secara benar sesuai label NANDA. Selain itu ada juga 22 label diagnosis yang dituliskan tidak sesuai taksonomi NANDA.Kesimpulan: Mayoritas label diagnosis keperawatan yang dituliskan perawat tidak sesuai dengan label diagnosis keperawatan dalam taksonomi NANDA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/jkkk.29011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jkkk.29011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:印度尼西亚精神科护理人员的护理和协作诊断准确性相关信息不足。目的:本研究的目的是确定护理与护士建立和预测的协同诊断之间的对应关系。方法:采用描述性横断面研究,调查81名护士。数据收集于2013年,采用两种类型的问卷。第一份问卷用于确定护士遇到的最常见的护理和协作诊断。第二份问卷用于识别护士最常识别的数据。第二份问卷是根据Intan筛查诊断评估(ISDA)的顺序编制的。结果:护理人员共编制护理诊断标签46个。46个护理诊断标签中,只有13个(28.26%)与北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)护理诊断分类(2012-2014)中的标签准确对应。11个诊断(23.91%)可作为关键概念(或诊断焦点)纳入NANDA分类。然而,这些护理诊断标签没有像NANDA标签那样正确书写。另有22例(47%)诊断标签未列入NANDA分类。结论:绝大多数护理诊断标签与NANDA分类中的护理诊断标签不匹配。ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Belum banyak informasi terkait akurasi诊断keperawatan丹杨kolaboratif dibuat perawat dalam设置keperawatan jiwa di印度尼西亚。图juan:图juan dari peneltian ini untuk mengidenti kasi kesesesaian antara诊断keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang sudah ditegakkan dan yang diduga oleh perawat。方法:Penelitian ini mongunakan ranancan横断面yang melibatkan 81响应perawat。数据统计2013年数据统计2个月。慢性肾衰竭诊断为慢性肾衰竭,诊断为慢性肾衰竭,诊断为慢性肾衰竭。Kuesioner kedua digunakan untuk mengididi kasi数据yang paling服务于diemukan olhawa。Kuesioner kedua dikembangkan berdasarkan Intan筛查诊断评估(ISDA)。Hasil: Dari Hasil penelitian didapati terdapat 46标签诊断keperawatan dibuleh perawat。Dari 46标签诊断keperawatan hanya 14标签诊断(28.26%)yang sesuai dengan标签诊断berdasarkan分类学北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)(2012-2014)。Sebanyak 11例诊断(23,91%),诊断结果为:1例确诊为sebagai konsep penting(非焦点诊断);nama标签的诊断与NANDA标签的诊断一致,但与NANDA标签的诊断一致。Selain itu ada juga 22标签诊断yang dituliskan taksonomi NANDA。Mayoritas标签诊断keperawatan yang dituliskan perawat tidak sesuai dengan标签诊断keperawatan dalam taksonomi NANDA。
Perbandingan Antara Diagnosis yang Sering Ditegakkan dan Possible Diagnosis yang Diprediksikan oleh Perawat Pada Klien dengan Gangguan Jiwa
Background: There is not enough information related to the accuracy of nursing and collaborative diagnoses established by nurses in psychiatric setting in Indonesia.Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the correspondence between nursing and collaborative diagnoses established and predicted by nurses.Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study which employed 81 nurse respondents. Data were collected in 2013 using two types of questionnaires. The rst questionnaire was used to identify the most frequent nursing and collaborative diagnoses encountered by the nurses. The second questionnaire was used to identify data which were most frequently identi ed by the nurses. The second questionnaire was developed based on the sequence in the Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Results: The results indicated that there were 46 nursing diagnosis labels established by the nurses. Of the 46 nursing diagnosis labels, only 13 (28.26%) corresponded precisely to the labels in North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) taxonomy (2012-2014) of nursing diagnoses. As many as 11 diagnoses (23.91%) could be included as key concepts (or diagnostic foci) in NANDA taxonomy. However, these nursing diagnosis labels did not written correctly as in NANDA labels. There were also 22 diagnosis (47%) labels not listed in NANDA taxonomy.Conclusion: The majority of nursing diagnosis labels did not match with nursing diagnosis labels in NANDA taxonomy. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Belum banyak informasi terkait akurasi diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang dibuat perawat dalam setting keperawatan jiwa di Indonesia.Tujuan: Tujuan dari peneltian ini untuk mengidenti kasi kesesuaian antara diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang sudah ditegakkan dan yang diduga oleh perawat. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan cross sectional yang melibatkan 81 responden perawat. Data dikumpulkan pada tahun 2013 menggunakan 2 kuesioner. Kuesioner pertama digunakan untuk mengetahui diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang paling sering ditegakkan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua digunakan untuk mengidenti kasi data yang paling sering ditemukan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua dikembangkan berdasarkan Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Hasil: Dari hasil penelitian didapati terdapat 46 label diagnosis keperawatan dibuat oleh perawat. Dari 46 label diagnosis keperawatan hanya 14 label diagnosis (28,26%) yang sesuai dengan label diagnosis berdasarkan taxonomi North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) (2012-2014). Sebanyak 11 diagnosis (23,91%) dapat tercakup sebagai konsep penting (atau fokus diagnostik) dalam taksonomi NANDA. Namun label diagnosis keperawatan tersebut tidak dituliskan secara benar sesuai label NANDA. Selain itu ada juga 22 label diagnosis yang dituliskan tidak sesuai taksonomi NANDA.Kesimpulan: Mayoritas label diagnosis keperawatan yang dituliskan perawat tidak sesuai dengan label diagnosis keperawatan dalam taksonomi NANDA.