刑事诉讼中的真相:(im)可能性?

Leilane Serratine Grubba
{"title":"刑事诉讼中的真相:(im)可能性?","authors":"Leilane Serratine Grubba","doi":"10.5433/1980-511X.2017V12N1P266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.","PeriodicalId":120475,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Direito Público","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A verdade no processo penal: (im)possibilidades?\",\"authors\":\"Leilane Serratine Grubba\",\"doi\":\"10.5433/1980-511X.2017V12N1P266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Direito Público\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Direito Público\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2017V12N1P266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Direito Público","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2017V12N1P266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在《巴西刑事诉讼法》中寻找“真相”;此外,它被视为对被告的保障。此外,刑事诉讼法在事实重构时寻求真相。此外,它是一种犯罪的特征,有了它,就保证了对被告的公正裁决。因此,本文讨论存在真理的可能性或不可能性,这是本研究的主要焦点。然而,真正的知识是程序语言和发生的事件之间的对应关系。本文运用亚历山大·莱特的理论,提出了以下假设:充分相信真命题知识的存在在哲学上是不合适的。本文第一章运用演绎法,阐述了巴西刑事诉讼法最大追求的“刑事程序真实”的概念。接下来,在第二章中,本研究解构了真相——作为现实的镜子——与犯罪过程中的真相相同的观点。因此,如果这一理论是正确的,人们就不能承认存在真正的刑事程序(形式的或材料的),而只能承认存在正当的刑事程序知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A verdade no processo penal: (im)possibilidades?
This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信