媒体旁观者理论:以“印度反腐败”示威为例

U. Pandey
{"title":"媒体旁观者理论:以“印度反腐败”示威为例","authors":"U. Pandey","doi":"10.5958/J.0974-0600.5.2.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of media spectacles is largely woven around symbols and a largely passive audience. It, hence, becomes possible to look at media rituals and media spectacles as a thesis and an anti-thesis in the Hegelian sense. The media events in the classical sense are, thus, seen as links between communication technologies and social structures. They connect ‘portability, reproducibility, linearity and simultaneity’ to ‘empire, church, nation and market’. The live nature of the broadcast is shaped by the dialectics of performativity and passive consumption. Unlike the consumption of spectacles, spectatuals require the active participation of the audience in the event. As the spiral gathers more steam, so does the broadcast. Once the performative involvement of the audience is lost, the broadcasters lose interest in the event. Since, by definition, the spectatuals involve the dialectics of pre-planning and unpredictability, the turn of events, though shaped by the contours of the pre-plan, takes an unpredictable turn. The centre, in our case the Ramlila grounds, the venue of the fast, is dispersed throughout the country, both through real representation and in simulated forms, which are diffused outwards. Contradictions between reverent, awe-filled narration for the protagonist and anger against the ‘common enemies’ work together in the construction of the spectatual. The function of the spectatual is defined by the tensions between integration of society and the clamour for symbolic change - the passage of the Lok Pal bill in our example. The dialects of powerful media and loss of control too are evident in our case study of spectatuals.","PeriodicalId":286963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Communication","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theory of Media Spectatuals: A Case Study of ‘India Against Corruption’ Demonstrations\",\"authors\":\"U. Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.5958/J.0974-0600.5.2.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of media spectacles is largely woven around symbols and a largely passive audience. It, hence, becomes possible to look at media rituals and media spectacles as a thesis and an anti-thesis in the Hegelian sense. The media events in the classical sense are, thus, seen as links between communication technologies and social structures. They connect ‘portability, reproducibility, linearity and simultaneity’ to ‘empire, church, nation and market’. The live nature of the broadcast is shaped by the dialectics of performativity and passive consumption. Unlike the consumption of spectacles, spectatuals require the active participation of the audience in the event. As the spiral gathers more steam, so does the broadcast. Once the performative involvement of the audience is lost, the broadcasters lose interest in the event. Since, by definition, the spectatuals involve the dialectics of pre-planning and unpredictability, the turn of events, though shaped by the contours of the pre-plan, takes an unpredictable turn. The centre, in our case the Ramlila grounds, the venue of the fast, is dispersed throughout the country, both through real representation and in simulated forms, which are diffused outwards. Contradictions between reverent, awe-filled narration for the protagonist and anger against the ‘common enemies’ work together in the construction of the spectatual. The function of the spectatual is defined by the tensions between integration of society and the clamour for symbolic change - the passage of the Lok Pal bill in our example. The dialects of powerful media and loss of control too are evident in our case study of spectatuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Communication\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5958/J.0974-0600.5.2.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/J.0974-0600.5.2.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

媒体奇观的概念在很大程度上是围绕着符号和大部分被动的观众编织的。因此,在黑格尔的意义上,将媒体仪式和媒体奇观视为正题和反题是可能的。因此,传统意义上的媒体事件被视为通信技术与社会结构之间的联系。他们将“可移植性、可重复性、线性性和同时性”与“帝国、教会、国家和市场”联系起来。广播的直播性是由表演性和被动消费的辩证法塑造的。与眼镜消费不同的是,旁观者需要观众积极参与到事件中来。随着螺旋聚集的蒸汽越来越多,广播也越来越多。一旦失去了观众的表演参与,广播者就会失去对事件的兴趣。因为,根据定义,旁观者涉及预先计划和不可预测性的辩证法,事件的转变,虽然由预先计划的轮廓塑造,采取不可预测的转变。中心,在我们的案例中是拉姆利拉场地,斋月的场地,通过真实的表现和模拟的形式分散在全国各地,并向外扩散。对主人公充满崇敬和敬畏的叙述与对“共同敌人”的愤怒之间的矛盾,在观众的建构中共同作用。观众的功能是由社会融合和要求象征性变革的呼声之间的紧张关系所定义的-在我们的例子中,洛克帕尔法案的通过。在我们对观众的案例研究中,强大媒体和失控的方言也很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Theory of Media Spectatuals: A Case Study of ‘India Against Corruption’ Demonstrations
The notion of media spectacles is largely woven around symbols and a largely passive audience. It, hence, becomes possible to look at media rituals and media spectacles as a thesis and an anti-thesis in the Hegelian sense. The media events in the classical sense are, thus, seen as links between communication technologies and social structures. They connect ‘portability, reproducibility, linearity and simultaneity’ to ‘empire, church, nation and market’. The live nature of the broadcast is shaped by the dialectics of performativity and passive consumption. Unlike the consumption of spectacles, spectatuals require the active participation of the audience in the event. As the spiral gathers more steam, so does the broadcast. Once the performative involvement of the audience is lost, the broadcasters lose interest in the event. Since, by definition, the spectatuals involve the dialectics of pre-planning and unpredictability, the turn of events, though shaped by the contours of the pre-plan, takes an unpredictable turn. The centre, in our case the Ramlila grounds, the venue of the fast, is dispersed throughout the country, both through real representation and in simulated forms, which are diffused outwards. Contradictions between reverent, awe-filled narration for the protagonist and anger against the ‘common enemies’ work together in the construction of the spectatual. The function of the spectatual is defined by the tensions between integration of society and the clamour for symbolic change - the passage of the Lok Pal bill in our example. The dialects of powerful media and loss of control too are evident in our case study of spectatuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信