车辆主动安全临界估计最优控制的可用性和可解释性

S. Herrmann, W. Utschick
{"title":"车辆主动安全临界估计最优控制的可用性和可解释性","authors":"S. Herrmann, W. Utschick","doi":"10.3850/9783981537079_1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current and future vehicular active safety systems rely on situation interpretation algorithms for mapping sensor information of the environment to a criticality or threat value. In dangerous driving situations, these metrics are used to trigger a range of safety interventions from warning the driver, pre-tensioning of the braking system, automatic emergency braking, and automatic emergency braking and steering. For highly complex functions like automatic braking and steering, validation through real-world test drives become increasingly costly and time-consuming. Here, simulation studies can be used, where a large set of dangerous driving scenarios is labeled with a reference criticality, that should represent the true criticality. In order to find such a ground truth criticality, we propose an optimal control formulation of criticality taking into account a vehicle dynamics model as well as lane constraints. Further, using stochastically generated driving scenes, we explore the tradeoff between different goal functions and constraint formulations for interpretability and convergence of the criticality measure in simulation scenarios.","PeriodicalId":311352,"journal":{"name":"2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Availability and interpretability of optimal control for criticality estimation in vehicle active safety\",\"authors\":\"S. Herrmann, W. Utschick\",\"doi\":\"10.3850/9783981537079_1033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current and future vehicular active safety systems rely on situation interpretation algorithms for mapping sensor information of the environment to a criticality or threat value. In dangerous driving situations, these metrics are used to trigger a range of safety interventions from warning the driver, pre-tensioning of the braking system, automatic emergency braking, and automatic emergency braking and steering. For highly complex functions like automatic braking and steering, validation through real-world test drives become increasingly costly and time-consuming. Here, simulation studies can be used, where a large set of dangerous driving scenarios is labeled with a reference criticality, that should represent the true criticality. In order to find such a ground truth criticality, we propose an optimal control formulation of criticality taking into account a vehicle dynamics model as well as lane constraints. Further, using stochastically generated driving scenes, we explore the tradeoff between different goal functions and constraint formulations for interpretability and convergence of the criticality measure in simulation scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3850/9783981537079_1033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3850/9783981537079_1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当前和未来的车辆主动安全系统依赖于将环境传感器信息映射到临界或威胁值的态势解释算法。在危险驾驶情况下,这些指标可用于触发一系列安全干预措施,包括警告驾驶员、制动系统预张紧、自动紧急制动以及自动紧急制动和转向。对于高度复杂的功能,如自动制动和转向,通过实际测试驾驶验证变得越来越昂贵和耗时。在这里,可以使用模拟研究,其中大量危险驾驶场景被标记为参考临界,这应该代表真正的临界。为了找到这样一个真实临界,我们提出了一个考虑车辆动力学模型和车道约束的最优临界控制公式。此外,使用随机生成的驾驶场景,我们探索了不同目标函数和约束公式之间的权衡,以实现模拟场景中临界度量的可解释性和收敛性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Availability and interpretability of optimal control for criticality estimation in vehicle active safety
Current and future vehicular active safety systems rely on situation interpretation algorithms for mapping sensor information of the environment to a criticality or threat value. In dangerous driving situations, these metrics are used to trigger a range of safety interventions from warning the driver, pre-tensioning of the braking system, automatic emergency braking, and automatic emergency braking and steering. For highly complex functions like automatic braking and steering, validation through real-world test drives become increasingly costly and time-consuming. Here, simulation studies can be used, where a large set of dangerous driving scenarios is labeled with a reference criticality, that should represent the true criticality. In order to find such a ground truth criticality, we propose an optimal control formulation of criticality taking into account a vehicle dynamics model as well as lane constraints. Further, using stochastically generated driving scenes, we explore the tradeoff between different goal functions and constraint formulations for interpretability and convergence of the criticality measure in simulation scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信