社会生产的一般规律

Paul Cammack
{"title":"社会生产的一般规律","authors":"Paul Cammack","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marx’s general law of social production stems from his argument that capitalist competition gives rise to continued efforts to break each process of production down into ever-smaller constituent elements, without looking first at the ability of the human hand to perform new processes. This in turn compels workers to be versatile, flexible, and mobile in order to survive in the capitalist economy. In the advanced economies, and in particular in Europe, this tendency is hampered by the legacy of labour market and welfare institutions that protect workers from the impact of the changes in contracts, patterns of work, and forms of welfare or social protection that machine- and digital platform-led revolutions in production require. This chapter documents the intensive collaboration between the OECD, the World Bank, and the European Commission to secure welfare and labour market reforms with the objective of forcing ‘hard to reach’ groups such as youth or married women to enter the labour market or increase their participation. At the same time, these organisations advocate the replacement of ‘standard labour contracts’ with more flexible patterns of work, and a reduced onus on employers to offer permanence or rights to redundancy payments on dismissal. The chapter details efforts of these institutions to incentivise paid work, re-orient education towards work-related skills training and ‘employability’, and devise a ‘constitution’ for global competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":273362,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Global Competitiveness","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The General Law of Social Production\",\"authors\":\"Paul Cammack\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marx’s general law of social production stems from his argument that capitalist competition gives rise to continued efforts to break each process of production down into ever-smaller constituent elements, without looking first at the ability of the human hand to perform new processes. This in turn compels workers to be versatile, flexible, and mobile in order to survive in the capitalist economy. In the advanced economies, and in particular in Europe, this tendency is hampered by the legacy of labour market and welfare institutions that protect workers from the impact of the changes in contracts, patterns of work, and forms of welfare or social protection that machine- and digital platform-led revolutions in production require. This chapter documents the intensive collaboration between the OECD, the World Bank, and the European Commission to secure welfare and labour market reforms with the objective of forcing ‘hard to reach’ groups such as youth or married women to enter the labour market or increase their participation. At the same time, these organisations advocate the replacement of ‘standard labour contracts’ with more flexible patterns of work, and a reduced onus on employers to offer permanence or rights to redundancy payments on dismissal. The chapter details efforts of these institutions to incentivise paid work, re-orient education towards work-related skills training and ‘employability’, and devise a ‘constitution’ for global competitiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Politics of Global Competitiveness\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Politics of Global Competitiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Global Competitiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马克思的社会生产一般规律源于他的论点,即资本主义竞争导致不断努力将每个生产过程分解为越来越小的组成要素,而不首先考虑人类的手执行新过程的能力。为了在资本主义经济中生存,这反过来又迫使工人变得多才多艺、灵活机动。在发达经济体,尤其是在欧洲,这一趋势受到劳动力市场和福利制度遗留问题的阻碍,这些制度保护工人免受合同、工作模式、福利或社会保护形式变化的影响,而这些变化是机器和数字平台主导的生产革命所需要的。本章记录了经合组织、世界银行和欧盟委员会之间的密切合作,以确保福利和劳动力市场改革,目标是迫使“难以接触”的群体(如青年或已婚妇女)进入劳动力市场或增加他们的参与度。与此同时,这些组织主张用更灵活的工作模式取代“标准劳动合同”,并减少雇主提供永久职位或解雇时获得遣散费的责任。本章详细介绍了这些机构在激励有偿工作、将教育重新定位于与工作相关的技能培训和“就业能力”以及为全球竞争力制定“宪法”方面所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The General Law of Social Production
Marx’s general law of social production stems from his argument that capitalist competition gives rise to continued efforts to break each process of production down into ever-smaller constituent elements, without looking first at the ability of the human hand to perform new processes. This in turn compels workers to be versatile, flexible, and mobile in order to survive in the capitalist economy. In the advanced economies, and in particular in Europe, this tendency is hampered by the legacy of labour market and welfare institutions that protect workers from the impact of the changes in contracts, patterns of work, and forms of welfare or social protection that machine- and digital platform-led revolutions in production require. This chapter documents the intensive collaboration between the OECD, the World Bank, and the European Commission to secure welfare and labour market reforms with the objective of forcing ‘hard to reach’ groups such as youth or married women to enter the labour market or increase their participation. At the same time, these organisations advocate the replacement of ‘standard labour contracts’ with more flexible patterns of work, and a reduced onus on employers to offer permanence or rights to redundancy payments on dismissal. The chapter details efforts of these institutions to incentivise paid work, re-orient education towards work-related skills training and ‘employability’, and devise a ‘constitution’ for global competitiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信