评论文章:寻找可行的马克思主义替代资本主义

Hee-Young Shin
{"title":"评论文章:寻找可行的马克思主义替代资本主义","authors":"Hee-Young Shin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3749703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews Peter Hudis and Richard Wolff's recent contributions to feasible and viable Marxian alternatives to both capitalism and historical socialism. Both Hudis’ reinterpretation of Marx’s major writings and Wolff’s proposal for building a WSDE-based economy are important attempts at answering various questions surrounding Marxian post-capitalist visions. However, Hudis’ textual analysis fails to make sense of Marx’s contradictory positions toward the Proudhonian utopian project and to fully discuss the importance of worker cooperatives. Wolff’s WSDE-based economy also left many important issues untouched, especially in explaining the relationship between WSDEs and other corporate ownerships and the proper relationship between the state’s planning and the market. This article attempts to address these problems in order to contribute to our collective endeavor for searching for feasible and viable alternatives to existing systems.","PeriodicalId":253619,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review Article: Searching for Feasible and Viable Marxian Alternatives to Capitalism\",\"authors\":\"Hee-Young Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3749703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reviews Peter Hudis and Richard Wolff's recent contributions to feasible and viable Marxian alternatives to both capitalism and historical socialism. Both Hudis’ reinterpretation of Marx’s major writings and Wolff’s proposal for building a WSDE-based economy are important attempts at answering various questions surrounding Marxian post-capitalist visions. However, Hudis’ textual analysis fails to make sense of Marx’s contradictory positions toward the Proudhonian utopian project and to fully discuss the importance of worker cooperatives. Wolff’s WSDE-based economy also left many important issues untouched, especially in explaining the relationship between WSDEs and other corporate ownerships and the proper relationship between the state’s planning and the market. This article attempts to address these problems in order to contribute to our collective endeavor for searching for feasible and viable alternatives to existing systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3749703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3749703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了Peter Hudis和Richard Wolff最近对资本主义和历史社会主义的可行和可行的马克思主义替代方案的贡献。胡迪斯对马克思主要著作的重新解读,以及沃尔夫提出的建立以wsde为基础的经济的建议,都是回答围绕马克思后资本主义愿景的各种问题的重要尝试。然而,胡迪斯的文本分析未能理解马克思对蒲鲁东乌托邦计划的矛盾立场,也未能充分讨论工人合作社的重要性。沃尔夫以wsde为基础的经济也没有触及许多重要问题,特别是在解释wsde与其他公司所有权之间的关系以及国家计划与市场之间的适当关系时。本文试图解决这些问题,以便为我们的集体努力作出贡献,以寻找现有系统的可行和可行的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review Article: Searching for Feasible and Viable Marxian Alternatives to Capitalism
This article reviews Peter Hudis and Richard Wolff's recent contributions to feasible and viable Marxian alternatives to both capitalism and historical socialism. Both Hudis’ reinterpretation of Marx’s major writings and Wolff’s proposal for building a WSDE-based economy are important attempts at answering various questions surrounding Marxian post-capitalist visions. However, Hudis’ textual analysis fails to make sense of Marx’s contradictory positions toward the Proudhonian utopian project and to fully discuss the importance of worker cooperatives. Wolff’s WSDE-based economy also left many important issues untouched, especially in explaining the relationship between WSDEs and other corporate ownerships and the proper relationship between the state’s planning and the market. This article attempts to address these problems in order to contribute to our collective endeavor for searching for feasible and viable alternatives to existing systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信