当电子文化发生冲突:电子邮件和文化对谈判行为的影响

A. S. Rosette, J. Brett, Z. Barsness, Anne L. Lytle
{"title":"当电子文化发生冲突:电子邮件和文化对谈判行为的影响","authors":"A. S. Rosette, J. Brett, Z. Barsness, Anne L. Lytle","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.959034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypotheses based on e-mail features and cultural norms predicted differences in the use of aggressive opening offers and individual gains between Hong Kong Chinese and U.S. negotiators. Study 1 examined intra-cultural negotiations and Study 2 investigated inter-cultural negotiations. Taken together, the two studies suggest that Hong Kong and U.S. negotiators vary substantially in the manner in which they negotiate via email and face-to-face, which resulted in differences in individual gains.","PeriodicalId":193943,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Cultures Clash Electronically: The Impact of E-Mail and Culture on Negotiation Behavior\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Rosette, J. Brett, Z. Barsness, Anne L. Lytle\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.959034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hypotheses based on e-mail features and cultural norms predicted differences in the use of aggressive opening offers and individual gains between Hong Kong Chinese and U.S. negotiators. Study 1 examined intra-cultural negotiations and Study 2 investigated inter-cultural negotiations. Taken together, the two studies suggest that Hong Kong and U.S. negotiators vary substantially in the manner in which they negotiate via email and face-to-face, which resulted in differences in individual gains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.959034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.959034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

基于电子邮件特征和文化规范的假设预测了香港中国人和美国谈判者在使用积极的开场白和个人利益方面的差异。研究1调查了文化内谈判,研究2调查了文化间谈判。综上所述,这两项研究表明,香港和美国的谈判代表在通过电子邮件和面对面谈判的方式上存在很大差异,这导致了个人收益的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Cultures Clash Electronically: The Impact of E-Mail and Culture on Negotiation Behavior
Hypotheses based on e-mail features and cultural norms predicted differences in the use of aggressive opening offers and individual gains between Hong Kong Chinese and U.S. negotiators. Study 1 examined intra-cultural negotiations and Study 2 investigated inter-cultural negotiations. Taken together, the two studies suggest that Hong Kong and U.S. negotiators vary substantially in the manner in which they negotiate via email and face-to-face, which resulted in differences in individual gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信