信息技术的垄断

Enzus Tinianus
{"title":"信息技术的垄断","authors":"Enzus Tinianus","doi":"10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.4537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition in the business world causes business actors to sometimes resort to various ways to conduct unfair business competition, resulting in losses for other business actors. In the virtual world (information technology for example) this action is often found. So it is necessary to study how the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition against businesses in the field of information technology. This research is a normative legal research, the main data of which is obtained through library research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the form of market monopoly and unfair business competition in information technology law can be in the form of vertical integration, discrimination of business actors, taking of domain names, and other actions that can harm business competitors. The Tying Arrangement in the Microsoft case is a form of unfair business competition, in which the giant software company Microsoft is accused of violating the antitrust law by taking Tying Arrangements by linking the windows product (the tying product) with the internet explorer browser product (the tied product). The Tying Arrangement was allegedly carried out in order to win a monopoly in the internet browser product market.","PeriodicalId":448059,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MONOPOLI DI BIDANG TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI\",\"authors\":\"Enzus Tinianus\",\"doi\":\"10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.4537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Competition in the business world causes business actors to sometimes resort to various ways to conduct unfair business competition, resulting in losses for other business actors. In the virtual world (information technology for example) this action is often found. So it is necessary to study how the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition against businesses in the field of information technology. This research is a normative legal research, the main data of which is obtained through library research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the form of market monopoly and unfair business competition in information technology law can be in the form of vertical integration, discrimination of business actors, taking of domain names, and other actions that can harm business competitors. The Tying Arrangement in the Microsoft case is a form of unfair business competition, in which the giant software company Microsoft is accused of violating the antitrust law by taking Tying Arrangements by linking the windows product (the tying product) with the internet explorer browser product (the tied product). The Tying Arrangement was allegedly carried out in order to win a monopoly in the internet browser product market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.4537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.4537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

商业世界中的竞争导致商业行为者有时采取各种方式进行不公平的商业竞争,导致其他商业行为者遭受损失。在虚拟世界(例如信息技术)中,这种行为经常被发现。因此,有必要研究如何在信息技术领域禁止针对企业的垄断行为和不正当商业竞争。本研究是一项规范性的法律研究,其主要数据是通过图书馆调研获得的。根据研究结果可知,信息技术法中的市场垄断和不正当商业竞争的形式可以是纵向整合、对商业行为者的歧视、占用域名等损害商业竞争者利益的行为。微软案中的“捆绑安排”是指软件巨头微软将windows产品(捆绑产品)与ie浏览器产品(捆绑产品)相关联,利用“捆绑安排”违反了反垄断法,是一种不正当商业竞争的形式。“捆绑安排”涉嫌在互联网浏览器产品市场取得垄断地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MONOPOLI DI BIDANG TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI
Competition in the business world causes business actors to sometimes resort to various ways to conduct unfair business competition, resulting in losses for other business actors. In the virtual world (information technology for example) this action is often found. So it is necessary to study how the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition against businesses in the field of information technology. This research is a normative legal research, the main data of which is obtained through library research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the form of market monopoly and unfair business competition in information technology law can be in the form of vertical integration, discrimination of business actors, taking of domain names, and other actions that can harm business competitors. The Tying Arrangement in the Microsoft case is a form of unfair business competition, in which the giant software company Microsoft is accused of violating the antitrust law by taking Tying Arrangements by linking the windows product (the tying product) with the internet explorer browser product (the tied product). The Tying Arrangement was allegedly carried out in order to win a monopoly in the internet browser product market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信