国外刑事诉讼法对软禁作为预防措施的法律规定

D. Abdullayev
{"title":"国外刑事诉讼法对软禁作为预防措施的法律规定","authors":"D. Abdullayev","doi":"10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./gtrf3787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the priorities is the liberalization and improvement of criminal procedural legislation in the process of implementing judicial and legal reforms in our country. House arrest is seen by most legal scholars as a means of humanizing modern criminal politics and criminal justice. According to our national legislation, house arrest is a new legal institution concerning other precautions. Therefore, in order to find a rational solution to some problematic cases arising in the practice of applying the law, it is desirable to use scientific-theoretical in-depth study and positive experience of the views of foreign countries with extensive experience in the implementation of this precautionary measure. In this article, the author examines the legal regulation of the measure of house arrest on the basis of the norms of criminal procedural legislation of the Commonwealth of Independent States, the USA, and some European countries, in particular, the basis and conditions for the application of this measure, the types of restrictions imposed on a person by comparative analysis. Also, the scientific and legal aspects of issues related to the procedure for applying for house arrest are expressed through the views of foreign experts and legal scholars, and the essence is revealed, and in the summary section of the article, conclusions and suggestions on improving the national legislation on the home arrest precaution and the practice of its application are presented.","PeriodicalId":102464,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEGAL REGULATION OF HOUSE ARREST AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE IN FOREIGN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAWS\",\"authors\":\"D. Abdullayev\",\"doi\":\"10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./gtrf3787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the priorities is the liberalization and improvement of criminal procedural legislation in the process of implementing judicial and legal reforms in our country. House arrest is seen by most legal scholars as a means of humanizing modern criminal politics and criminal justice. According to our national legislation, house arrest is a new legal institution concerning other precautions. Therefore, in order to find a rational solution to some problematic cases arising in the practice of applying the law, it is desirable to use scientific-theoretical in-depth study and positive experience of the views of foreign countries with extensive experience in the implementation of this precautionary measure. In this article, the author examines the legal regulation of the measure of house arrest on the basis of the norms of criminal procedural legislation of the Commonwealth of Independent States, the USA, and some European countries, in particular, the basis and conditions for the application of this measure, the types of restrictions imposed on a person by comparative analysis. Also, the scientific and legal aspects of issues related to the procedure for applying for house arrest are expressed through the views of foreign experts and legal scholars, and the essence is revealed, and in the summary section of the article, conclusions and suggestions on improving the national legislation on the home arrest precaution and the practice of its application are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Law Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Law Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./gtrf3787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./gtrf3787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我国实施司法和法律改革的过程中,刑事诉讼立法的自由化和完善是当务之急之一。软禁被大多数法律学者视为现代刑事政治和刑事司法人性化的一种手段。根据我国立法,软禁是一项涉及其他防范措施的新法律制度。因此,为了合理解决在适用法律的实践中出现的一些问题,最好是利用科学的理论深入研究和积极的经验,在执行这一预防措施方面具有丰富经验的外国的意见。本文以独联体国家、美国和一些欧洲国家的刑事诉讼立法规范为基础,对软禁措施的法律规制进行了考察,特别是对软禁措施适用的依据和条件、对人的限制类型进行了比较分析。同时,通过外国专家和法律学者的观点,对软禁申请程序相关问题的科学性和法律性进行阐述,揭示其本质,并在文章的总结部分,对完善我国软禁预防立法及其适用实践提出结论和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LEGAL REGULATION OF HOUSE ARREST AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE IN FOREIGN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAWS
One of the priorities is the liberalization and improvement of criminal procedural legislation in the process of implementing judicial and legal reforms in our country. House arrest is seen by most legal scholars as a means of humanizing modern criminal politics and criminal justice. According to our national legislation, house arrest is a new legal institution concerning other precautions. Therefore, in order to find a rational solution to some problematic cases arising in the practice of applying the law, it is desirable to use scientific-theoretical in-depth study and positive experience of the views of foreign countries with extensive experience in the implementation of this precautionary measure. In this article, the author examines the legal regulation of the measure of house arrest on the basis of the norms of criminal procedural legislation of the Commonwealth of Independent States, the USA, and some European countries, in particular, the basis and conditions for the application of this measure, the types of restrictions imposed on a person by comparative analysis. Also, the scientific and legal aspects of issues related to the procedure for applying for house arrest are expressed through the views of foreign experts and legal scholars, and the essence is revealed, and in the summary section of the article, conclusions and suggestions on improving the national legislation on the home arrest precaution and the practice of its application are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信