比较目标设定方法促进亲环境行为

Sandy Staples, J. Webster, Shunan Lv
{"title":"比较目标设定方法促进亲环境行为","authors":"Sandy Staples, J. Webster, Shunan Lv","doi":"10.20900/jsr20200034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Corporations face challenges to adopting appropriate practices to effectively respond to environmental sustainability concerns. To help address this, the present research focuses on improving employees’ pro-environmental behaviors related mostly to information technology and system use. To do so, we draw on and extend goal-setting theory by comparing three goal interventions: goal-setting, goal-setting plus implementation plans, and goal-setting with both implementation plans and visualization of success. For these, we also examine the role of individuals’ environmental values as well as their conflicts with competing goals. \nMethods: Two longitudinal studies examine individuals’ self-set goals: the first examines employees’ computer-based electricity usage in the workplace over six weeks and the second utilizes a diary approach method over four weeks to examine the effects of different environmental goal setting conditions on students’ environmental outcomes. The impacts of environmental values (self-congruence) and conflicting goals are also explored in the second study. \nResults: Both studies find that setting goals increases pro-environmental behaviors. However, rebound effects can occur when interventions are removed. Visualization of success appears to reduce this rebound effect and we suggest that future research continue to investigate methods for reducing rebound. \nConclusions: This paper contributes to environmental sustainability research in several ways: conceptually (by responding to calls for more theory-based research), methodologically (by measuring objective computer-based energy usage in study 1 and by utilizing a diary method in study 2), and practically (by demonstrating the effectiveness of visualization to goal setting and exploring the role of competing goals in this process).","PeriodicalId":275909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Research","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Goal Setting Approaches to Boosting Pro-Environmental Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Sandy Staples, J. Webster, Shunan Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.20900/jsr20200034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Corporations face challenges to adopting appropriate practices to effectively respond to environmental sustainability concerns. To help address this, the present research focuses on improving employees’ pro-environmental behaviors related mostly to information technology and system use. To do so, we draw on and extend goal-setting theory by comparing three goal interventions: goal-setting, goal-setting plus implementation plans, and goal-setting with both implementation plans and visualization of success. For these, we also examine the role of individuals’ environmental values as well as their conflicts with competing goals. \\nMethods: Two longitudinal studies examine individuals’ self-set goals: the first examines employees’ computer-based electricity usage in the workplace over six weeks and the second utilizes a diary approach method over four weeks to examine the effects of different environmental goal setting conditions on students’ environmental outcomes. The impacts of environmental values (self-congruence) and conflicting goals are also explored in the second study. \\nResults: Both studies find that setting goals increases pro-environmental behaviors. However, rebound effects can occur when interventions are removed. Visualization of success appears to reduce this rebound effect and we suggest that future research continue to investigate methods for reducing rebound. \\nConclusions: This paper contributes to environmental sustainability research in several ways: conceptually (by responding to calls for more theory-based research), methodologically (by measuring objective computer-based energy usage in study 1 and by utilizing a diary method in study 2), and practically (by demonstrating the effectiveness of visualization to goal setting and exploring the role of competing goals in this process).\",\"PeriodicalId\":275909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainability Research\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:企业面临着采取适当做法以有效应对环境可持续性问题的挑战。为了帮助解决这个问题,目前的研究重点是提高员工的亲环境行为,主要涉及信息技术和系统的使用。为此,我们借鉴并扩展了目标设定理论,通过比较三种目标干预:目标设定、目标设定加实施计划、目标设定与实施计划和成功可视化。为此,我们还研究了个人环境价值观的作用以及他们与竞争目标的冲突。方法:两项纵向研究考察了个人的自我设定目标:第一项研究考察了员工在六周内的工作场所电脑用电情况,第二项研究采用日记法,考察了四周内不同的环境目标设定条件对学生环境结果的影响。第二项研究还探讨了环境价值(自我一致)和冲突目标的影响。结果:两项研究都发现,设定目标会增加亲环境行为。然而,当干预措施被取消时,反弹效应可能会发生。成功的可视化似乎减少了这种反弹效应,我们建议未来的研究继续探索减少反弹的方法。结论:本文在几个方面为环境可持续性研究做出了贡献:概念上(通过响应对更多基于理论的研究的呼吁),方法上(通过在研究1中测量客观的基于计算机的能源使用,并在研究2中利用日记法),以及实践上(通过展示可视化对目标设定的有效性,并探索在这一过程中相互竞争的目标的作用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Goal Setting Approaches to Boosting Pro-Environmental Behaviors
Background: Corporations face challenges to adopting appropriate practices to effectively respond to environmental sustainability concerns. To help address this, the present research focuses on improving employees’ pro-environmental behaviors related mostly to information technology and system use. To do so, we draw on and extend goal-setting theory by comparing three goal interventions: goal-setting, goal-setting plus implementation plans, and goal-setting with both implementation plans and visualization of success. For these, we also examine the role of individuals’ environmental values as well as their conflicts with competing goals. Methods: Two longitudinal studies examine individuals’ self-set goals: the first examines employees’ computer-based electricity usage in the workplace over six weeks and the second utilizes a diary approach method over four weeks to examine the effects of different environmental goal setting conditions on students’ environmental outcomes. The impacts of environmental values (self-congruence) and conflicting goals are also explored in the second study. Results: Both studies find that setting goals increases pro-environmental behaviors. However, rebound effects can occur when interventions are removed. Visualization of success appears to reduce this rebound effect and we suggest that future research continue to investigate methods for reducing rebound. Conclusions: This paper contributes to environmental sustainability research in several ways: conceptually (by responding to calls for more theory-based research), methodologically (by measuring objective computer-based energy usage in study 1 and by utilizing a diary method in study 2), and practically (by demonstrating the effectiveness of visualization to goal setting and exploring the role of competing goals in this process).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信