资格和可靠性测试:我们在做什么,为什么?

R. A. Munroe
{"title":"资格和可靠性测试:我们在做什么,为什么?","authors":"R. A. Munroe","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2000.853425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The semiconductor industry and its customers perform component qualification tests and reliability tests that are reasonably similar if not the same due to the standards in the industry and tradition. Some of the tests are not reliability tests, but robustness tests and the term reliability is often misused. As semiconductor technology has advanced and electronic packaging has changed the tests and criteria have not been changed at the same rate. The spectrum of applications has grown so that in some cases the tests are overly stringent or testing for the wrong failure mechanisms. In other cases the tests do not adequately reflect the level or length of time necessary to ensure successful applications. This paper will attempt to challenge the conventional tests and acceptance of those tests and to encourage the reader to look at semiconductor tests in a different light. A proposed method is made to use the tests in place in a more productive manner.","PeriodicalId":410140,"journal":{"name":"2000 Proceedings. 50th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37070)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualification and reliability tests: What are we doing and why?\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Munroe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2000.853425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The semiconductor industry and its customers perform component qualification tests and reliability tests that are reasonably similar if not the same due to the standards in the industry and tradition. Some of the tests are not reliability tests, but robustness tests and the term reliability is often misused. As semiconductor technology has advanced and electronic packaging has changed the tests and criteria have not been changed at the same rate. The spectrum of applications has grown so that in some cases the tests are overly stringent or testing for the wrong failure mechanisms. In other cases the tests do not adequately reflect the level or length of time necessary to ensure successful applications. This paper will attempt to challenge the conventional tests and acceptance of those tests and to encourage the reader to look at semiconductor tests in a different light. A proposed method is made to use the tests in place in a more productive manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2000 Proceedings. 50th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37070)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2000 Proceedings. 50th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37070)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2000.853425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2000 Proceedings. 50th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37070)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2000.853425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

半导体行业及其客户执行组件资格测试和可靠性测试,如果由于行业标准和传统而不相同,则相当相似。有些测试不是可靠性测试,而是稳健性测试,可靠性这个术语经常被误用。随着半导体技术的进步和电子封装的变化,测试和标准并没有以同样的速度变化。应用程序的范围已经扩大,因此在某些情况下,测试过于严格或测试错误的故障机制。在其他情况下,测试不能充分反映确保成功申请所需的水平或时间长度。本文将尝试挑战传统测试和接受这些测试,并鼓励读者从不同的角度看待半导体测试。提出了一种建议的方法,以便以更有效的方式使用现有的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualification and reliability tests: What are we doing and why?
The semiconductor industry and its customers perform component qualification tests and reliability tests that are reasonably similar if not the same due to the standards in the industry and tradition. Some of the tests are not reliability tests, but robustness tests and the term reliability is often misused. As semiconductor technology has advanced and electronic packaging has changed the tests and criteria have not been changed at the same rate. The spectrum of applications has grown so that in some cases the tests are overly stringent or testing for the wrong failure mechanisms. In other cases the tests do not adequately reflect the level or length of time necessary to ensure successful applications. This paper will attempt to challenge the conventional tests and acceptance of those tests and to encourage the reader to look at semiconductor tests in a different light. A proposed method is made to use the tests in place in a more productive manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信