{"title":"凯恩斯在他的一生中从未假设过……所有的陈述或重新定位彼此之间都有逻辑关系(Misak, 2020，第114页)","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.22158/ape.v5n3p20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a review of C.Misak’s2020 biography of F P Ramsey, a reviewer named F. E. Guerra-Pujol assumed that the material contained in Misak’s book on Keynes, as regards Ramsey’s claims about Keynes’s Logical Theory of Probability, on pp. 112-121 and pp.264-273,was true.The problem is that all of the material in Misak’s book dealing with Keynes is wrong, as it is based on claims made by F. P. Ramsey that directly conflicted with Keynes’s application of Boole’s relational, propositional logic.","PeriodicalId":219226,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Politics and Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keynes Never Assumed at Any Time in His Life… That All Statements or Repositions Stand in Logical Relation to each other (Misak, 2020, p. 114)\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/ape.v5n3p20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a review of C.Misak’s2020 biography of F P Ramsey, a reviewer named F. E. Guerra-Pujol assumed that the material contained in Misak’s book on Keynes, as regards Ramsey’s claims about Keynes’s Logical Theory of Probability, on pp. 112-121 and pp.264-273,was true.The problem is that all of the material in Misak’s book dealing with Keynes is wrong, as it is based on claims made by F. P. Ramsey that directly conflicted with Keynes’s application of Boole’s relational, propositional logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Politics and Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Politics and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v5n3p20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Politics and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v5n3p20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在对c .米萨克2020年出版的拉姆齐传记的评论中，一位名叫F. E. Guerra-Pujol的评论家认为，米萨克关于凯恩斯的书中包含的材料，关于拉姆齐关于凯恩斯的逻辑概率论的主张，第112-121页和第264-273页是真实的。问题在于，米萨克书中关于凯恩斯的所有材料都是错误的，因为它是基于拉姆齐(f.p. Ramsey)的主张，而这与凯恩斯对布尔关系逻辑和命题逻辑的应用直接冲突。
Keynes Never Assumed at Any Time in His Life… That All Statements or Repositions Stand in Logical Relation to each other (Misak, 2020, p. 114)
In a review of C.Misak’s2020 biography of F P Ramsey, a reviewer named F. E. Guerra-Pujol assumed that the material contained in Misak’s book on Keynes, as regards Ramsey’s claims about Keynes’s Logical Theory of Probability, on pp. 112-121 and pp.264-273,was true.The problem is that all of the material in Misak’s book dealing with Keynes is wrong, as it is based on claims made by F. P. Ramsey that directly conflicted with Keynes’s application of Boole’s relational, propositional logic.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
