非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术,前瞻性队列研究

Mohammad Abbassi Teshnisi, G. Safarpoor, Atefeh Ghorbanzadeh, M. Akbari, Kayhan Mizani, Mahsa Moallemi, Omid Javdanfar, Aliasghar Moeinipour
{"title":"非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术,前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Mohammad Abbassi Teshnisi, G. Safarpoor, Atefeh Ghorbanzadeh, M. Akbari, Kayhan Mizani, Mahsa Moallemi, Omid Javdanfar, Aliasghar Moeinipour","doi":"10.22038/JCTM.2020.50378.1285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting is a surgical operation that bypasses atherosclerotic coronary vessels and restores blood flow to the ischemic zone of hearts. And two different conventional methods are ON-pump CABG, and Off-pump CABG.  Altogether, the efficacy and safety of these two types of surgical procedures are still under debate. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of these two different methods in admitted patients to Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad in Iran during 2006 to 2016. Materials and Method: In this prospective cohort study, 533 patients who underwent CABG in Imam Reza hospital in Mashhad during 2006 to 2016 were identified. The data was collected using hospital records including demographic data, chief complaint, history of previous disease, ejection fraction, number of graft, blood transfusion, time of anesthesia, time of surgery, days of hospitalization, days of ICU stay, needs for reoperation, post-operative complication, expenses of hospitalization. Results: Of 533 patients were 347 patients of whom male. The mean age was 59.53±10.21 and the mean BMI was 26.38±5.4. The most common chief complaint of the patients was chest pain. 38 patients of 533 cases underwent on-pump surgery and 495 underwent off-pump technique. There were no significant differences for age, and gender. The prevalence of HTN, diabetes, MI, and hyperlipidemia had no differences among two groups. Renal failure was more common in on-pump group; whereas, pulmonary disease was more common in off-pump group. On-pump surgery required significantly longer hospitalization and ICU care. Also needs for reoperation was more common among on-pump surgery. Total expenses were significantly higher in on-pump group.10.5% of those who underwent on-pump surgery died after surgery. This rate was only 3.1% among off-pump group. Conclusion: In this study we showed that, the patients who underwent on-pump surgery, required longer hospitalization, and ICU care. Total expenses were significantly higher in on-pump group. In addition, the mortality rate of on-pump group was significantly higher than the off-pump group. Also needs for reoperation was more common among on-pump surgery. Altogether, it seems that off-pump surgery is safer with low expenses than on-pump CABG.","PeriodicalId":131413,"journal":{"name":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abbassi Teshnisi, G. Safarpoor, Atefeh Ghorbanzadeh, M. Akbari, Kayhan Mizani, Mahsa Moallemi, Omid Javdanfar, Aliasghar Moeinipour\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/JCTM.2020.50378.1285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting is a surgical operation that bypasses atherosclerotic coronary vessels and restores blood flow to the ischemic zone of hearts. And two different conventional methods are ON-pump CABG, and Off-pump CABG.  Altogether, the efficacy and safety of these two types of surgical procedures are still under debate. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of these two different methods in admitted patients to Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad in Iran during 2006 to 2016. Materials and Method: In this prospective cohort study, 533 patients who underwent CABG in Imam Reza hospital in Mashhad during 2006 to 2016 were identified. The data was collected using hospital records including demographic data, chief complaint, history of previous disease, ejection fraction, number of graft, blood transfusion, time of anesthesia, time of surgery, days of hospitalization, days of ICU stay, needs for reoperation, post-operative complication, expenses of hospitalization. Results: Of 533 patients were 347 patients of whom male. The mean age was 59.53±10.21 and the mean BMI was 26.38±5.4. The most common chief complaint of the patients was chest pain. 38 patients of 533 cases underwent on-pump surgery and 495 underwent off-pump technique. There were no significant differences for age, and gender. The prevalence of HTN, diabetes, MI, and hyperlipidemia had no differences among two groups. Renal failure was more common in on-pump group; whereas, pulmonary disease was more common in off-pump group. On-pump surgery required significantly longer hospitalization and ICU care. Also needs for reoperation was more common among on-pump surgery. Total expenses were significantly higher in on-pump group.10.5% of those who underwent on-pump surgery died after surgery. This rate was only 3.1% among off-pump group. Conclusion: In this study we showed that, the patients who underwent on-pump surgery, required longer hospitalization, and ICU care. Total expenses were significantly higher in on-pump group. In addition, the mortality rate of on-pump group was significantly higher than the off-pump group. Also needs for reoperation was more common among on-pump surgery. Altogether, it seems that off-pump surgery is safer with low expenses than on-pump CABG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/JCTM.2020.50378.1285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JCTM.2020.50378.1285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:冠状动脉旁路移植术是一种绕过动脉粥样硬化的冠状血管,恢复心脏缺血区血液流动的外科手术。两种不同的常规方法是开泵CABG和开泵CABG。总之,这两种手术的有效性和安全性仍在争论中。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较这两种不同方法在2006年至2016年伊朗马什哈德伊玛目礼萨医院住院患者中的疗效、安全性和成本效益。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,确定了2006年至2016年在马什哈德伊玛目礼萨医院接受CABG的533例患者。资料收集使用医院记录,包括人口统计资料、主诉、既往病史、射血分数、移植物次数、输血次数、麻醉时间、手术时间、住院天数、ICU住院天数、再次手术需求、术后并发症、住院费用。结果:533例患者中,男性347例。平均年龄59.53±10.21,平均BMI 26.38±5.4。患者最常见的主诉是胸痛。533例患者中有38例接受了有泵手术,495例接受了无泵手术。年龄和性别没有显著差异。两组之间HTN、糖尿病、心肌梗死和高脂血症的患病率无差异。无泵组肾功能衰竭发生率较高;无泵组肺部疾病发生率更高。无泵手术需要更长的住院时间和ICU护理。在无泵手术中,再次手术的需求也更为常见。非泵送组的总费用明显高于非泵送组,10.5%的患者术后死亡。在非泵组中,这一比例仅为3.1%。结论:在本研究中,我们发现,接受泵上手术的患者需要更长的住院时间和ICU护理。无泵组总费用明显高于无泵组。此外,有泵组的死亡率显著高于无泵组。在无泵手术中,再次手术的需求也更为常见。总的来说,非泵送手术似乎比泵送CABG更安全,费用更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, prospective cohort study
Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting is a surgical operation that bypasses atherosclerotic coronary vessels and restores blood flow to the ischemic zone of hearts. And two different conventional methods are ON-pump CABG, and Off-pump CABG.  Altogether, the efficacy and safety of these two types of surgical procedures are still under debate. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of these two different methods in admitted patients to Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad in Iran during 2006 to 2016. Materials and Method: In this prospective cohort study, 533 patients who underwent CABG in Imam Reza hospital in Mashhad during 2006 to 2016 were identified. The data was collected using hospital records including demographic data, chief complaint, history of previous disease, ejection fraction, number of graft, blood transfusion, time of anesthesia, time of surgery, days of hospitalization, days of ICU stay, needs for reoperation, post-operative complication, expenses of hospitalization. Results: Of 533 patients were 347 patients of whom male. The mean age was 59.53±10.21 and the mean BMI was 26.38±5.4. The most common chief complaint of the patients was chest pain. 38 patients of 533 cases underwent on-pump surgery and 495 underwent off-pump technique. There were no significant differences for age, and gender. The prevalence of HTN, diabetes, MI, and hyperlipidemia had no differences among two groups. Renal failure was more common in on-pump group; whereas, pulmonary disease was more common in off-pump group. On-pump surgery required significantly longer hospitalization and ICU care. Also needs for reoperation was more common among on-pump surgery. Total expenses were significantly higher in on-pump group.10.5% of those who underwent on-pump surgery died after surgery. This rate was only 3.1% among off-pump group. Conclusion: In this study we showed that, the patients who underwent on-pump surgery, required longer hospitalization, and ICU care. Total expenses were significantly higher in on-pump group. In addition, the mortality rate of on-pump group was significantly higher than the off-pump group. Also needs for reoperation was more common among on-pump surgery. Altogether, it seems that off-pump surgery is safer with low expenses than on-pump CABG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信