创新实践11C:韧性

Chen-Yong Cher, Mohan J. Kumar
{"title":"创新实践11C:韧性","authors":"Chen-Yong Cher, Mohan J. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/VTS.2013.6548943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Hardware co-design is a key mechanism to realizing reliability at platform level. While error avoidance is the ideal, it is not always practical in an economic sense. Often used technique is to detect errors in hardware and implement the recovery in coordination with software. This talk will discuss some examples of such coordination on Intel Xeon (e.g., DIMM Sparing, MCA recovery) and the implications of this type of solution such as platform validation, interface standardization, software enablement, etc.","PeriodicalId":138435,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 31st VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative practices session 11C: Resilience\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Yong Cher, Mohan J. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VTS.2013.6548943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software Hardware co-design is a key mechanism to realizing reliability at platform level. While error avoidance is the ideal, it is not always practical in an economic sense. Often used technique is to detect errors in hardware and implement the recovery in coordination with software. This talk will discuss some examples of such coordination on Intel Xeon (e.g., DIMM Sparing, MCA recovery) and the implications of this type of solution such as platform validation, interface standardization, software enablement, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 31st VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 31st VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTS.2013.6548943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 31st VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTS.2013.6548943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软硬件协同设计是实现平台级可靠性的关键机制。虽然避免错误是理想的,但从经济意义上讲,它并不总是实用的。通常使用的技术是检测硬件中的错误,并与软件协调实现恢复。本讲座将讨论在Intel至强处理器上实现这种协作的一些例子(例如,DIMM Sparing, MCA recovery),以及这种解决方案在平台验证、接口标准化、软件支持等方面的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative practices session 11C: Resilience
Software Hardware co-design is a key mechanism to realizing reliability at platform level. While error avoidance is the ideal, it is not always practical in an economic sense. Often used technique is to detect errors in hardware and implement the recovery in coordination with software. This talk will discuss some examples of such coordination on Intel Xeon (e.g., DIMM Sparing, MCA recovery) and the implications of this type of solution such as platform validation, interface standardization, software enablement, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信