openSAFETY协议通过IEEE 802.11无线通信的性能

Armin Hadziaganovic, M. K. Atiq, Thomas Blazek, Hans-Peter Bernhard, A. Springer
{"title":"openSAFETY协议通过IEEE 802.11无线通信的性能","authors":"Armin Hadziaganovic, M. K. Atiq, Thomas Blazek, Hans-Peter Bernhard, A. Springer","doi":"10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional safety has become a crucial part of industrial automation. With industry environments being connected more than ever, achieving required functional safety depends on establishing safety-critical communication. Numerous application layer safety protocols have been developed to ensure compliance with functional safety standards for wired communications. However, with all the benefits wireless communications entails, wireless communication is pushing for an important place in the future of industrial automation. It is important that safety protocols also follow this transition and are able to operate as intended using a wireless channel. By default, openSAFETY frames are exchanged using UDP broadcast, whereas TCP provides additional reliability features. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze if safety-critical communication using a wireless channel can benefit from the additional reliability features provided by TCP. To answer this, we experimentally analyze the performance of openSAFETY protocol providing functional safety over the IEEE 802.11 standard for three different test cases. We analyze the performance in terms of median end-to-end delay and time spent by a safety node in a safe state for both protocol stacks. Results show that UDP provides lower median end-to-end delay, whereas TCP is able to achieve less time spent in a safe state under bounded delay constraint.","PeriodicalId":312498,"journal":{"name":"2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA )","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance of openSAFETY protocol via IEEE 802.11 wireless communication\",\"authors\":\"Armin Hadziaganovic, M. K. Atiq, Thomas Blazek, Hans-Peter Bernhard, A. Springer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Functional safety has become a crucial part of industrial automation. With industry environments being connected more than ever, achieving required functional safety depends on establishing safety-critical communication. Numerous application layer safety protocols have been developed to ensure compliance with functional safety standards for wired communications. However, with all the benefits wireless communications entails, wireless communication is pushing for an important place in the future of industrial automation. It is important that safety protocols also follow this transition and are able to operate as intended using a wireless channel. By default, openSAFETY frames are exchanged using UDP broadcast, whereas TCP provides additional reliability features. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze if safety-critical communication using a wireless channel can benefit from the additional reliability features provided by TCP. To answer this, we experimentally analyze the performance of openSAFETY protocol providing functional safety over the IEEE 802.11 standard for three different test cases. We analyze the performance in terms of median end-to-end delay and time spent by a safety node in a safe state for both protocol stacks. Results show that UDP provides lower median end-to-end delay, whereas TCP is able to achieve less time spent in a safe state under bounded delay constraint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA )\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA )\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA )","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

功能安全已成为工业自动化的重要组成部分。随着工业环境比以往任何时候都更加互联,实现所需的功能安全取决于建立安全关键通信。为了确保符合有线通信的功能安全标准,已经开发了许多应用层安全协议。然而,由于无线通信带来的所有好处,无线通信正在推动在未来的工业自动化中占据重要地位。重要的是,安全协议也遵循这种转变,并能够使用无线信道按预期操作。默认情况下,openSAFETY帧使用UDP广播进行交换,而TCP提供了额外的可靠性特性。因此,本文的目的是分析使用无线信道的安全关键通信是否可以从TCP提供的额外可靠性特性中受益。为了回答这个问题,我们在三个不同的测试用例中实验分析了openSAFETY协议在IEEE 802.11标准上提供功能安全的性能。我们根据中位端到端延迟和安全节点在两个协议栈的安全状态下花费的时间来分析性能。结果表明,UDP提供更低的端到端延迟中值,而TCP在有界延迟约束下能够实现更少的安全状态花费时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The performance of openSAFETY protocol via IEEE 802.11 wireless communication
Functional safety has become a crucial part of industrial automation. With industry environments being connected more than ever, achieving required functional safety depends on establishing safety-critical communication. Numerous application layer safety protocols have been developed to ensure compliance with functional safety standards for wired communications. However, with all the benefits wireless communications entails, wireless communication is pushing for an important place in the future of industrial automation. It is important that safety protocols also follow this transition and are able to operate as intended using a wireless channel. By default, openSAFETY frames are exchanged using UDP broadcast, whereas TCP provides additional reliability features. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze if safety-critical communication using a wireless channel can benefit from the additional reliability features provided by TCP. To answer this, we experimentally analyze the performance of openSAFETY protocol providing functional safety over the IEEE 802.11 standard for three different test cases. We analyze the performance in terms of median end-to-end delay and time spent by a safety node in a safe state for both protocol stacks. Results show that UDP provides lower median end-to-end delay, whereas TCP is able to achieve less time spent in a safe state under bounded delay constraint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信