网站可信度与用户参与度:理论整合

Farrah Diana, S. Bahry, M. Masrom, M. N. Masrek
{"title":"网站可信度与用户参与度:理论整合","authors":"Farrah Diana, S. Bahry, M. Masrom, M. N. Masrek","doi":"10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid advancement in web technology has shifted the role of organizational websites from a merely communication tool to a strategic tool for gaining competitive advantage. Organizational website has to be interactive, integrative and intuitive so that its presence is captured by the user. However, the organizational website presence tends to be ignored due to credibility issues and demotivating factors of user engagement. While research on website credibility and user engagement has been extensively reported in the literature, an attempt to combine both in single study is still very scarce. Thus, this study proposes a framework that integrates website credibility measures and user engagement. Credibility is defined as a multiple construct comprising of surface credibility, source credibility, content credibility and reputed credibility. User engagement is defined as two construct which are user participation and involvement. Drawing upon the literatures, the four dimensions of credibility are hypothesized to have a significant relationship with the two dimensions of user engagement. The proposed framework should be of interest to researchers focusing on website assessment.","PeriodicalId":387278,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Website credibility and user engagement: A theoretical integration\",\"authors\":\"Farrah Diana, S. Bahry, M. Masrom, M. N. Masrek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid advancement in web technology has shifted the role of organizational websites from a merely communication tool to a strategic tool for gaining competitive advantage. Organizational website has to be interactive, integrative and intuitive so that its presence is captured by the user. However, the organizational website presence tends to be ignored due to credibility issues and demotivating factors of user engagement. While research on website credibility and user engagement has been extensively reported in the literature, an attempt to combine both in single study is still very scarce. Thus, this study proposes a framework that integrates website credibility measures and user engagement. Credibility is defined as a multiple construct comprising of surface credibility, source credibility, content credibility and reputed credibility. User engagement is defined as two construct which are user participation and involvement. Drawing upon the literatures, the four dimensions of credibility are hypothesized to have a significant relationship with the two dimensions of user engagement. The proposed framework should be of interest to researchers focusing on website assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

网络技术的飞速发展使组织网站的角色从单纯的沟通工具转变为获得竞争优势的战略工具。组织网站必须是互动的,综合的和直观的,这样它的存在是由用户捕获。然而,由于信誉问题和用户参与的消极因素,组织网站的存在往往被忽视。虽然对网站可信度和用户参与度的研究已经在文献中得到了广泛的报道,但将两者结合在一起的研究仍然很少。因此,本研究提出了一个整合网站可信度措施和用户参与度的框架。可信度是由表面可信度、来源可信度、内容可信度和口碑可信度构成的多重结构。用户参与被定义为两个结构:用户参与和用户参与。根据文献,我们假设可信度的四个维度与用户参与度的两个维度有显著的关系。提出的框架应该感兴趣的研究人员专注于网站评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Website credibility and user engagement: A theoretical integration
The rapid advancement in web technology has shifted the role of organizational websites from a merely communication tool to a strategic tool for gaining competitive advantage. Organizational website has to be interactive, integrative and intuitive so that its presence is captured by the user. However, the organizational website presence tends to be ignored due to credibility issues and demotivating factors of user engagement. While research on website credibility and user engagement has been extensively reported in the literature, an attempt to combine both in single study is still very scarce. Thus, this study proposes a framework that integrates website credibility measures and user engagement. Credibility is defined as a multiple construct comprising of surface credibility, source credibility, content credibility and reputed credibility. User engagement is defined as two construct which are user participation and involvement. Drawing upon the literatures, the four dimensions of credibility are hypothesized to have a significant relationship with the two dimensions of user engagement. The proposed framework should be of interest to researchers focusing on website assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信