阑尾切除术后围手术期抗生素应用的适宜性及疗效

E. Amelia, Bambang Arianto, A. Purnamayanti
{"title":"阑尾切除术后围手术期抗生素应用的适宜性及疗效","authors":"E. Amelia, Bambang Arianto, A. Purnamayanti","doi":"10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no research currently exist about the use \nof ceftriaxone as perioverative antibiotics for appendicitis \npatient in Haji General Hospital Surabaya, so its \nrelationship with the surgical wound after appendectomy is \nremain unknown. This research is conducted to determine \nthe suitability and efficacy of ceftriaxone, also to identify \nother factors that influence the surgical wound. This was a \nprospective cohort study of 25 patients (a \nge ≥ 15 years old) \nbetween June \n– \nAugust 2015. The specimens culture \ndemonstrated that 12 bacteria were E. coli, 1 ESBL- \nproducing E. coli and 12 negative. Antibiotics susceptibility \ntesting showed that 41,67% E. coli was susceptible to \nceftriaxone. There was no significant relationship between \nsuitability of postoperative antibiotics and surgical wound \nafter appendectomy in non-perforated cases (p=0,505), \nwhile perforated case defined a significant relationship \n(p=0,011). The factors which significantly related with \nsurgical wound were gender (p=0,014) and duration of \nsurgery (p=0,017). Ceftriaxone was still effective as \nperioperative antibiotics. Postoperative antibiotics were \nonly required for perforated appendicitis, whereas \nprophylactic antibiotic was known to be adequate in the \ncase of non-perforated.","PeriodicalId":281523,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences","volume":"293 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Suitability and Efficacy of Perioperative Antibiotics in Relation with the Surgical Wound after Appendectomy\",\"authors\":\"E. Amelia, Bambang Arianto, A. Purnamayanti\",\"doi\":\"10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no research currently exist about the use \\nof ceftriaxone as perioverative antibiotics for appendicitis \\npatient in Haji General Hospital Surabaya, so its \\nrelationship with the surgical wound after appendectomy is \\nremain unknown. This research is conducted to determine \\nthe suitability and efficacy of ceftriaxone, also to identify \\nother factors that influence the surgical wound. This was a \\nprospective cohort study of 25 patients (a \\nge ≥ 15 years old) \\nbetween June \\n– \\nAugust 2015. The specimens culture \\ndemonstrated that 12 bacteria were E. coli, 1 ESBL- \\nproducing E. coli and 12 negative. Antibiotics susceptibility \\ntesting showed that 41,67% E. coli was susceptible to \\nceftriaxone. There was no significant relationship between \\nsuitability of postoperative antibiotics and surgical wound \\nafter appendectomy in non-perforated cases (p=0,505), \\nwhile perforated case defined a significant relationship \\n(p=0,011). The factors which significantly related with \\nsurgical wound were gender (p=0,014) and duration of \\nsurgery (p=0,017). Ceftriaxone was still effective as \\nperioperative antibiotics. Postoperative antibiotics were \\nonly required for perforated appendicitis, whereas \\nprophylactic antibiotic was known to be adequate in the \\ncase of non-perforated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"293 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前没有关于泗水哈吉总医院阑尾炎患者使用头孢曲松作为围手术期抗生素的研究,因此其与阑尾切除术后手术伤口的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定头孢曲松的适宜性和疗效,以及其他影响手术伤口的因素。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,在2015年6月至8月期间纳入了25例患者(年龄≥15岁)。标本培养结果显示,大肠杆菌12株,产ESBL大肠杆菌1株,阴性12株。药敏试验结果显示,41.67%的大肠杆菌对头孢曲松敏感。未穿孔病例术后抗生素的适宜性与阑尾切除术后手术伤口无显著相关性(p=0,505),穿孔病例术后抗生素适宜性与手术伤口有显著相关性(p=0,011)。性别(p= 0.014)和手术时间(p= 0.017)是与手术伤口有显著关系的因素。头孢曲松作为围手术期抗生素仍然有效。术后抗生素仅用于穿孔阑尾炎,而预防性抗生素已知在未穿孔的情况下是足够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Suitability and Efficacy of Perioperative Antibiotics in Relation with the Surgical Wound after Appendectomy
There is no research currently exist about the use of ceftriaxone as perioverative antibiotics for appendicitis patient in Haji General Hospital Surabaya, so its relationship with the surgical wound after appendectomy is remain unknown. This research is conducted to determine the suitability and efficacy of ceftriaxone, also to identify other factors that influence the surgical wound. This was a prospective cohort study of 25 patients (a ge ≥ 15 years old) between June – August 2015. The specimens culture demonstrated that 12 bacteria were E. coli, 1 ESBL- producing E. coli and 12 negative. Antibiotics susceptibility testing showed that 41,67% E. coli was susceptible to ceftriaxone. There was no significant relationship between suitability of postoperative antibiotics and surgical wound after appendectomy in non-perforated cases (p=0,505), while perforated case defined a significant relationship (p=0,011). The factors which significantly related with surgical wound were gender (p=0,014) and duration of surgery (p=0,017). Ceftriaxone was still effective as perioperative antibiotics. Postoperative antibiotics were only required for perforated appendicitis, whereas prophylactic antibiotic was known to be adequate in the case of non-perforated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信