{"title":"阑尾切除术后围手术期抗生素应用的适宜性及疗效","authors":"E. Amelia, Bambang Arianto, A. Purnamayanti","doi":"10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no research currently exist about the use \nof ceftriaxone as perioverative antibiotics for appendicitis \npatient in Haji General Hospital Surabaya, so its \nrelationship with the surgical wound after appendectomy is \nremain unknown. This research is conducted to determine \nthe suitability and efficacy of ceftriaxone, also to identify \nother factors that influence the surgical wound. This was a \nprospective cohort study of 25 patients (a \nge ≥ 15 years old) \nbetween June \n– \nAugust 2015. The specimens culture \ndemonstrated that 12 bacteria were E. coli, 1 ESBL- \nproducing E. coli and 12 negative. Antibiotics susceptibility \ntesting showed that 41,67% E. coli was susceptible to \nceftriaxone. There was no significant relationship between \nsuitability of postoperative antibiotics and surgical wound \nafter appendectomy in non-perforated cases (p=0,505), \nwhile perforated case defined a significant relationship \n(p=0,011). The factors which significantly related with \nsurgical wound were gender (p=0,014) and duration of \nsurgery (p=0,017). Ceftriaxone was still effective as \nperioperative antibiotics. Postoperative antibiotics were \nonly required for perforated appendicitis, whereas \nprophylactic antibiotic was known to be adequate in the \ncase of non-perforated.","PeriodicalId":281523,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences","volume":"293 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Suitability and Efficacy of Perioperative Antibiotics in Relation with the Surgical Wound after Appendectomy\",\"authors\":\"E. Amelia, Bambang Arianto, A. Purnamayanti\",\"doi\":\"10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no research currently exist about the use \\nof ceftriaxone as perioverative antibiotics for appendicitis \\npatient in Haji General Hospital Surabaya, so its \\nrelationship with the surgical wound after appendectomy is \\nremain unknown. This research is conducted to determine \\nthe suitability and efficacy of ceftriaxone, also to identify \\nother factors that influence the surgical wound. This was a \\nprospective cohort study of 25 patients (a \\nge ≥ 15 years old) \\nbetween June \\n– \\nAugust 2015. The specimens culture \\ndemonstrated that 12 bacteria were E. coli, 1 ESBL- \\nproducing E. coli and 12 negative. Antibiotics susceptibility \\ntesting showed that 41,67% E. coli was susceptible to \\nceftriaxone. There was no significant relationship between \\nsuitability of postoperative antibiotics and surgical wound \\nafter appendectomy in non-perforated cases (p=0,505), \\nwhile perforated case defined a significant relationship \\n(p=0,011). The factors which significantly related with \\nsurgical wound were gender (p=0,014) and duration of \\nsurgery (p=0,017). Ceftriaxone was still effective as \\nperioperative antibiotics. Postoperative antibiotics were \\nonly required for perforated appendicitis, whereas \\nprophylactic antibiotic was known to be adequate in the \\ncase of non-perforated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"293 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijpmbs.5.4.222-226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Suitability and Efficacy of Perioperative Antibiotics in Relation with the Surgical Wound after Appendectomy
There is no research currently exist about the use
of ceftriaxone as perioverative antibiotics for appendicitis
patient in Haji General Hospital Surabaya, so its
relationship with the surgical wound after appendectomy is
remain unknown. This research is conducted to determine
the suitability and efficacy of ceftriaxone, also to identify
other factors that influence the surgical wound. This was a
prospective cohort study of 25 patients (a
ge ≥ 15 years old)
between June
–
August 2015. The specimens culture
demonstrated that 12 bacteria were E. coli, 1 ESBL-
producing E. coli and 12 negative. Antibiotics susceptibility
testing showed that 41,67% E. coli was susceptible to
ceftriaxone. There was no significant relationship between
suitability of postoperative antibiotics and surgical wound
after appendectomy in non-perforated cases (p=0,505),
while perforated case defined a significant relationship
(p=0,011). The factors which significantly related with
surgical wound were gender (p=0,014) and duration of
surgery (p=0,017). Ceftriaxone was still effective as
perioperative antibiotics. Postoperative antibiotics were
only required for perforated appendicitis, whereas
prophylactic antibiotic was known to be adequate in the
case of non-perforated.