一项关于婴儿体外循环术后延迟复温干预的安全性和可行性的随机对照试验

A. Craig, K. Deerwester, Lauren McAllister, F. Noubary, Mary E. Hourihan
{"title":"一项关于婴儿体外循环术后延迟复温干预的安全性和可行性的随机对照试验","authors":"A. Craig, K. Deerwester, Lauren McAllister, F. Noubary, Mary E. Hourihan","doi":"10.33425/2768-0363.1009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Investigate safety and feasibility of a 12-hour delayed rewarming intervention on infants following congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery. Study Design: Pilot randomized control trial of infants <6 months old with CHD undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Infants were randomized 1:1 to standard of care (SOC) or to delayed rewarming intervention, accomplished by using a commercially available temperature regulating blanket set to gradually rewarm from 35°C to 36.5°C in the 12-hours following surgery. Safety was assessed by comparing the frequency of severe adverse events (SAE) for 48 hours after surgery. Feasibility was assessed by analysis of temperature data. Results: Twelve infants were randomized to SOC and 10 to the intervention group. Eight infants (36%) were female, 6 (27%) had Trisomy 21 and 7 (32%) had surgery in the first two weeks of life. Two SOC and one intervention infant had at least one SAE (p=0.57). Feasibility of the delayed rewarming intervention was demonstrated by a statistically significant difference in temperature over time between groups (p<0.001). Heart rates for infants in the intervention group were slower during and after the intervention, without significant changes in blood pressure. Infants in the intervention group had no evidence of coagulopathy with lower, but not statistically significantly lower, chest tube output at alltime points. Conclusions: There were no differences in the number of SAEs for the delayed rewarming group and the temperature curve indicates that the intervention is feasible. The results of this small study, from a single, small volume center must be interpreted cautiously. (NCT03036072).","PeriodicalId":297300,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics and Neonatal Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Safety and Feasibility of a Delayed Rewarming Intervention for Infants Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery\",\"authors\":\"A. Craig, K. Deerwester, Lauren McAllister, F. Noubary, Mary E. Hourihan\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2768-0363.1009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Investigate safety and feasibility of a 12-hour delayed rewarming intervention on infants following congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery. Study Design: Pilot randomized control trial of infants <6 months old with CHD undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Infants were randomized 1:1 to standard of care (SOC) or to delayed rewarming intervention, accomplished by using a commercially available temperature regulating blanket set to gradually rewarm from 35°C to 36.5°C in the 12-hours following surgery. Safety was assessed by comparing the frequency of severe adverse events (SAE) for 48 hours after surgery. Feasibility was assessed by analysis of temperature data. Results: Twelve infants were randomized to SOC and 10 to the intervention group. Eight infants (36%) were female, 6 (27%) had Trisomy 21 and 7 (32%) had surgery in the first two weeks of life. Two SOC and one intervention infant had at least one SAE (p=0.57). Feasibility of the delayed rewarming intervention was demonstrated by a statistically significant difference in temperature over time between groups (p<0.001). Heart rates for infants in the intervention group were slower during and after the intervention, without significant changes in blood pressure. Infants in the intervention group had no evidence of coagulopathy with lower, but not statistically significantly lower, chest tube output at alltime points. Conclusions: There were no differences in the number of SAEs for the delayed rewarming group and the temperature curve indicates that the intervention is feasible. The results of this small study, from a single, small volume center must be interpreted cautiously. (NCT03036072).\",\"PeriodicalId\":297300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics and Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics and Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2768-0363.1009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics and Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2768-0363.1009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨先天性心脏病(CHD)手术后12小时延迟复温干预的安全性和可行性。研究设计:对接受体外循环手术的小于6个月的冠心病婴儿进行随机对照试验。婴儿按1:1随机分为标准护理(SOC)或延迟复温干预,通过使用市售的温度调节毯,在手术后12小时内从35°C逐渐复温至36.5°C。通过比较手术后48小时内严重不良事件(SAE)的频率来评估安全性。通过对温度数据的分析,对其可行性进行了评估。结果:12例患儿随机分为SOC组,10例患儿随机分为干预组。8名婴儿(36%)为女性,6名(27%)患有21三体,7名(32%)在出生后两周内接受了手术。2例SOC和1例干预婴儿至少有1例SAE (p=0.57)。延迟复温干预的可行性通过组间温度随时间的统计学差异得到证实(p<0.001)。干预组婴儿的心率在干预期间和之后都较慢,血压没有明显变化。干预组婴儿在所有时间点胸管输出量较低,但没有统计学意义上的显著降低,没有凝血功能障碍的证据。结论:延迟复温组的SAEs数量无差异,温度曲线表明干预是可行的。这项来自单个小体积中心的小型研究的结果必须谨慎解释。(NCT03036072)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Safety and Feasibility of a Delayed Rewarming Intervention for Infants Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery
Objective: Investigate safety and feasibility of a 12-hour delayed rewarming intervention on infants following congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery. Study Design: Pilot randomized control trial of infants <6 months old with CHD undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Infants were randomized 1:1 to standard of care (SOC) or to delayed rewarming intervention, accomplished by using a commercially available temperature regulating blanket set to gradually rewarm from 35°C to 36.5°C in the 12-hours following surgery. Safety was assessed by comparing the frequency of severe adverse events (SAE) for 48 hours after surgery. Feasibility was assessed by analysis of temperature data. Results: Twelve infants were randomized to SOC and 10 to the intervention group. Eight infants (36%) were female, 6 (27%) had Trisomy 21 and 7 (32%) had surgery in the first two weeks of life. Two SOC and one intervention infant had at least one SAE (p=0.57). Feasibility of the delayed rewarming intervention was demonstrated by a statistically significant difference in temperature over time between groups (p<0.001). Heart rates for infants in the intervention group were slower during and after the intervention, without significant changes in blood pressure. Infants in the intervention group had no evidence of coagulopathy with lower, but not statistically significantly lower, chest tube output at alltime points. Conclusions: There were no differences in the number of SAEs for the delayed rewarming group and the temperature curve indicates that the intervention is feasible. The results of this small study, from a single, small volume center must be interpreted cautiously. (NCT03036072).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信