{"title":"语法隐喻的加工","authors":"Arndt Heilmann, T. Serbina, Stella Neumann","doi":"10.1075/TCB.00009.HEI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates cognitive effort invested in the translation and reading of grammatical metaphor. It is based on the\n results of two experiments conducted using the methods of keylogging and eyetracking. To test differences in processing, we\n devised a number of metaphorical and congruent stimuli integrated into a popular-scientific text. In this paper cognitive effort,\n operationalized through a number of pause and gaze measures, is examined by means of linear-mixed regression modelling. Our\n results show no difference in processing effort between congruent and metaphorical stretches of text.","PeriodicalId":191154,"journal":{"name":"Translation, Cognition & Behavior","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processing of grammatical metaphor\",\"authors\":\"Arndt Heilmann, T. Serbina, Stella Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/TCB.00009.HEI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper investigates cognitive effort invested in the translation and reading of grammatical metaphor. It is based on the\\n results of two experiments conducted using the methods of keylogging and eyetracking. To test differences in processing, we\\n devised a number of metaphorical and congruent stimuli integrated into a popular-scientific text. In this paper cognitive effort,\\n operationalized through a number of pause and gaze measures, is examined by means of linear-mixed regression modelling. Our\\n results show no difference in processing effort between congruent and metaphorical stretches of text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translation, Cognition & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translation, Cognition & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/TCB.00009.HEI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translation, Cognition & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/TCB.00009.HEI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper investigates cognitive effort invested in the translation and reading of grammatical metaphor. It is based on the
results of two experiments conducted using the methods of keylogging and eyetracking. To test differences in processing, we
devised a number of metaphorical and congruent stimuli integrated into a popular-scientific text. In this paper cognitive effort,
operationalized through a number of pause and gaze measures, is examined by means of linear-mixed regression modelling. Our
results show no difference in processing effort between congruent and metaphorical stretches of text.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
