标准化病人在跨专业教育课程交付中的应用:学生反馈的因果比较研究

V. Curran, A. Reid, Shari Fitzgerald, O. Heath, Paula Mullins-Richards
{"title":"标准化病人在跨专业教育课程交付中的应用:学生反馈的因果比较研究","authors":"V. Curran, A. Reid, Shari Fitzgerald, O. Heath, Paula Mullins-Richards","doi":"10.11157/FOHPE.V16I3.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Interprofessional education (IPE) has emerged as an essential component of training for students in the health and social care professions. Standardised patients (SPs) have also been developed as an important simulation-based learning modality in health and social care curricula due to the authenticity and realism of the patient or client encounter that may be replicated. Reports evaluating the use of SPs across an IPE curriculum in the health and social care professions are limited. Methods: This evaluation study used a causal-comparative research design to examine the effect of SPs as an instructional method in an IPE curriculum. Evaluative outcomes of the educational experiences of students attending 37 IPE learning modules offered between Autumn 2006 and Winter 2012 were analysed. Results: A total of 6,561 students from seven health and social care professions rated the usefulness of the instructional methods used in each module through post- module surveys. Students consistently rated SPs as significantly more useful than other instructional methods, and overall mean satisfaction scores were significantly higher for IPE modules that incorporated SPs. Conclusions: This study’s findings demonstrate the positive effect that SPs can have on the learning experiences of health and social care students. By Using SPs in IPE curricula, the authenticity of classroom-based interprofessional learning experiences can be enhanced and lead to more positive IPE learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":306686,"journal":{"name":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of standardised patients in interprofessional education curriculum delivery: A causal-comparative study of student feedback\",\"authors\":\"V. Curran, A. Reid, Shari Fitzgerald, O. Heath, Paula Mullins-Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.11157/FOHPE.V16I3.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Interprofessional education (IPE) has emerged as an essential component of training for students in the health and social care professions. Standardised patients (SPs) have also been developed as an important simulation-based learning modality in health and social care curricula due to the authenticity and realism of the patient or client encounter that may be replicated. Reports evaluating the use of SPs across an IPE curriculum in the health and social care professions are limited. Methods: This evaluation study used a causal-comparative research design to examine the effect of SPs as an instructional method in an IPE curriculum. Evaluative outcomes of the educational experiences of students attending 37 IPE learning modules offered between Autumn 2006 and Winter 2012 were analysed. Results: A total of 6,561 students from seven health and social care professions rated the usefulness of the instructional methods used in each module through post- module surveys. Students consistently rated SPs as significantly more useful than other instructional methods, and overall mean satisfaction scores were significantly higher for IPE modules that incorporated SPs. Conclusions: This study’s findings demonstrate the positive effect that SPs can have on the learning experiences of health and social care students. By Using SPs in IPE curricula, the authenticity of classroom-based interprofessional learning experiences can be enhanced and lead to more positive IPE learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11157/FOHPE.V16I3.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/FOHPE.V16I3.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

简介:跨专业教育(IPE)已成为卫生和社会护理专业学生培训的重要组成部分。标准化患者(SPs)也已发展成为保健和社会护理课程中一种重要的基于模拟的学习方式,因为患者或客户接触的真实性和现实性可以复制。评估在卫生和社会护理专业的IPE课程中使用SPs的报告是有限的。方法:本评估研究采用因果比较研究设计来检验SPs作为IPE课程教学方法的效果。本文分析了2006年秋至2012年冬37个国际政治经济学学习模块的学生教育体验的评价结果。结果:通过模块后调查,来自7个健康和社会护理专业的6,561名学生对每个模块中使用的教学方法的有用性进行了评分。学生一致认为SPs比其他教学方法更有用,并且纳入SPs的IPE模块的总体平均满意度得分显着更高。结论:本研究的结果表明,SPs对健康与社会关怀学生的学习体验有积极的影响。通过在国际政治政治课程中使用SPs,可以增强基于课堂的跨专业学习经验的真实性,并导致更积极的国际政治政治学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of standardised patients in interprofessional education curriculum delivery: A causal-comparative study of student feedback
Introduction: Interprofessional education (IPE) has emerged as an essential component of training for students in the health and social care professions. Standardised patients (SPs) have also been developed as an important simulation-based learning modality in health and social care curricula due to the authenticity and realism of the patient or client encounter that may be replicated. Reports evaluating the use of SPs across an IPE curriculum in the health and social care professions are limited. Methods: This evaluation study used a causal-comparative research design to examine the effect of SPs as an instructional method in an IPE curriculum. Evaluative outcomes of the educational experiences of students attending 37 IPE learning modules offered between Autumn 2006 and Winter 2012 were analysed. Results: A total of 6,561 students from seven health and social care professions rated the usefulness of the instructional methods used in each module through post- module surveys. Students consistently rated SPs as significantly more useful than other instructional methods, and overall mean satisfaction scores were significantly higher for IPE modules that incorporated SPs. Conclusions: This study’s findings demonstrate the positive effect that SPs can have on the learning experiences of health and social care students. By Using SPs in IPE curricula, the authenticity of classroom-based interprofessional learning experiences can be enhanced and lead to more positive IPE learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信