训练方法对PCA-KNN局部放电分类模型准确率的影响

N. Pattanadech, P. Nimsanong
{"title":"训练方法对PCA-KNN局部放电分类模型准确率的影响","authors":"N. Pattanadech, P. Nimsanong","doi":"10.1109/TENCON.2014.7022350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to describe the effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge (PD) classification model. This model used principal component analysis (PCA) combined with k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model, so called, PCA-KNN PD classification model for PD pattern classification. PD phenomena, corona at high voltage side in air (CHV), corona at low voltage side in air (CLV), surface discharge (SF), and internal discharge (IN) were experimented in the shielding room. Electromagnetic wave due to PD phenomena was detected using a log-periodic antenna and recorded employing a spectrum analyzer. 80 PD experiments in total were performed. The original independent variables for the classification model, skewness and kurtosis of each period of the captured signals, were calculated. To study the effect of training methods: two patterns for data training, odd/even and block training methods were investigated. In case of the block training method, the effect of training data number can be examined as well. Besides, noise signals were generated with the computer program and trained into the PD classification models. The peak of noise signal was set up at 30% of the peak value of the PD signal. These noise signals were added with the PD signals to generated a mixed noise - PD signal. Then, the mixed noise - PD signals were used to evaluate the performance of the PCA-KNN PD classification model. It was found that the block data training method provided the higher accuracy PD classification compared with the odd/event data training method. The block training method with 80% training data/20% testing data gave the highest accuracy (95% correction) for PD classification without noise signal. However, this training technique provided the lowest accuracy (56.25% correction) for PD classification with the mixed noise-PD signals.","PeriodicalId":292057,"journal":{"name":"TENCON 2014 - 2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge classification model\",\"authors\":\"N. Pattanadech, P. Nimsanong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TENCON.2014.7022350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to describe the effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge (PD) classification model. This model used principal component analysis (PCA) combined with k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model, so called, PCA-KNN PD classification model for PD pattern classification. PD phenomena, corona at high voltage side in air (CHV), corona at low voltage side in air (CLV), surface discharge (SF), and internal discharge (IN) were experimented in the shielding room. Electromagnetic wave due to PD phenomena was detected using a log-periodic antenna and recorded employing a spectrum analyzer. 80 PD experiments in total were performed. The original independent variables for the classification model, skewness and kurtosis of each period of the captured signals, were calculated. To study the effect of training methods: two patterns for data training, odd/even and block training methods were investigated. In case of the block training method, the effect of training data number can be examined as well. Besides, noise signals were generated with the computer program and trained into the PD classification models. The peak of noise signal was set up at 30% of the peak value of the PD signal. These noise signals were added with the PD signals to generated a mixed noise - PD signal. Then, the mixed noise - PD signals were used to evaluate the performance of the PCA-KNN PD classification model. It was found that the block data training method provided the higher accuracy PD classification compared with the odd/event data training method. The block training method with 80% training data/20% testing data gave the highest accuracy (95% correction) for PD classification without noise signal. However, this training technique provided the lowest accuracy (56.25% correction) for PD classification with the mixed noise-PD signals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TENCON 2014 - 2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TENCON 2014 - 2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2014.7022350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TENCON 2014 - 2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2014.7022350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文的目的是描述训练方法对PCA-KNN局部放电(PD)分类模型准确性的影响。该模型采用主成分分析(PCA)结合k近邻(KNN)模型,即PCA-KNN PD分类模型对PD模式进行分类。在屏蔽室内对局部放电现象、高压侧空气电晕(CHV)、低压侧空气电晕(CLV)、表面放电(SF)和内部放电(in)进行了实验。利用对数周期天线检测由局部放电现象引起的电磁波,并利用频谱分析仪进行记录。共进行PD实验80例。计算分类模型的原始自变量,即捕获信号的每个周期的偏度和峰度。为了研究训练方法的效果,研究了奇偶训练和块训练两种数据训练模式。对于块训练方法,还可以检验训练数据数量的影响。此外,利用计算机程序生成噪声信号,并训练到PD分类模型中。噪声信号的峰值设置在PD信号峰值的30%处。将这些噪声信号与PD信号相加,生成混合噪声- PD信号。然后,利用混合噪声- PD信号对PCA-KNN PD分类模型的性能进行评价。研究发现,与奇数/事件数据训练方法相比,块数据训练方法提供了更高的PD分类精度。训练数据80% /测试数据20%的分块训练方法对无噪声信号的PD分类准确率最高(正确率95%)。然而,这种训练方法对于混合噪声-PD信号的PD分类准确率最低(56.25%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge classification model
The aim of this paper is to describe the effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge (PD) classification model. This model used principal component analysis (PCA) combined with k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model, so called, PCA-KNN PD classification model for PD pattern classification. PD phenomena, corona at high voltage side in air (CHV), corona at low voltage side in air (CLV), surface discharge (SF), and internal discharge (IN) were experimented in the shielding room. Electromagnetic wave due to PD phenomena was detected using a log-periodic antenna and recorded employing a spectrum analyzer. 80 PD experiments in total were performed. The original independent variables for the classification model, skewness and kurtosis of each period of the captured signals, were calculated. To study the effect of training methods: two patterns for data training, odd/even and block training methods were investigated. In case of the block training method, the effect of training data number can be examined as well. Besides, noise signals were generated with the computer program and trained into the PD classification models. The peak of noise signal was set up at 30% of the peak value of the PD signal. These noise signals were added with the PD signals to generated a mixed noise - PD signal. Then, the mixed noise - PD signals were used to evaluate the performance of the PCA-KNN PD classification model. It was found that the block data training method provided the higher accuracy PD classification compared with the odd/event data training method. The block training method with 80% training data/20% testing data gave the highest accuracy (95% correction) for PD classification without noise signal. However, this training technique provided the lowest accuracy (56.25% correction) for PD classification with the mixed noise-PD signals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信