注意差距:通过警察培训将循证证人识别程序与实践联系起来

W. W. Cecconello, R. J. Fitzgerald, R. Milne, L. Stein
{"title":"注意差距:通过警察培训将循证证人识别程序与实践联系起来","authors":"W. W. Cecconello, R. J. Fitzgerald, R. Milne, L. Stein","doi":"10.1177/14613557231159543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has led to evidence-based eyewitness identification procedures, but empirical research on how to train police officers in such techniques is limited. We tested the effectiveness of the FAIR (Find a suspect, Avoiding bias, Instructing the witness, Record the procedure) eyewitness identification training program with 88 Brazilian police officers. The hypothesis that FAIR training would improve identification procedures was supported by pre- and post-training assessment of performance on a lineup construction task. Training increased the likelihood that police officers would construct lineups with known-innocent fillers and provide recommended pre-lineup instructions to witnesses (e.g., stating that the witness is not required to make an identification). Training also decreased non-recommended lineup practices, such as revealing the identity of the main suspect after a witness response. Feedback from the participants supports the conclusion that FAIR training improved knowledge of how to build lineups, instruct witnesses, and avoid undesirable and potentially biasing practices. Nevertheless, participants anticipated that incorporating the reform procedures into practice would provoke resistance from superiors and colleagues, which highlights the need for FAIR training to be supported by infrastructure, resources and policy that enable police officers to use evidence-based procedures in eyewitness identification.","PeriodicalId":382549,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Police Science & Management","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the gap: Bridging evidence-based witness identification procedures to practice through police training\",\"authors\":\"W. W. Cecconello, R. J. Fitzgerald, R. Milne, L. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14613557231159543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research has led to evidence-based eyewitness identification procedures, but empirical research on how to train police officers in such techniques is limited. We tested the effectiveness of the FAIR (Find a suspect, Avoiding bias, Instructing the witness, Record the procedure) eyewitness identification training program with 88 Brazilian police officers. The hypothesis that FAIR training would improve identification procedures was supported by pre- and post-training assessment of performance on a lineup construction task. Training increased the likelihood that police officers would construct lineups with known-innocent fillers and provide recommended pre-lineup instructions to witnesses (e.g., stating that the witness is not required to make an identification). Training also decreased non-recommended lineup practices, such as revealing the identity of the main suspect after a witness response. Feedback from the participants supports the conclusion that FAIR training improved knowledge of how to build lineups, instruct witnesses, and avoid undesirable and potentially biasing practices. Nevertheless, participants anticipated that incorporating the reform procedures into practice would provoke resistance from superiors and colleagues, which highlights the need for FAIR training to be supported by infrastructure, resources and policy that enable police officers to use evidence-based procedures in eyewitness identification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Police Science & Management\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Police Science & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231159543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Police Science & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231159543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究已经产生了以证据为基础的目击者识别程序,但关于如何训练警察使用这种技术的实证研究是有限的。我们在88名巴西警察中测试了FAIR(找到嫌疑人、避免偏见、指导证人、记录过程)目击者识别培训计划的有效性。公平训练可以改善识别程序的假设得到了训练前和训练后队列构建任务绩效评估的支持。培训增加了警察用已知无辜的填充者构建列队的可能性,并向证人提供推荐的列队前指示(例如,声明证人不需要作出指认)。培训还减少了非推荐的阵容做法,例如在证人回答后透露主要嫌疑人的身份。参与者的反馈支持这样的结论,即公平培训提高了如何建立阵容、指导证人以及避免不良和潜在偏见行为的知识。然而,与会者预计,将改革程序纳入实践将引起上级和同事的抵制,这突出表明,公平培训需要得到基础设施、资源和政策的支持,使警察能够在目击者识别中使用循证程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the gap: Bridging evidence-based witness identification procedures to practice through police training
Research has led to evidence-based eyewitness identification procedures, but empirical research on how to train police officers in such techniques is limited. We tested the effectiveness of the FAIR (Find a suspect, Avoiding bias, Instructing the witness, Record the procedure) eyewitness identification training program with 88 Brazilian police officers. The hypothesis that FAIR training would improve identification procedures was supported by pre- and post-training assessment of performance on a lineup construction task. Training increased the likelihood that police officers would construct lineups with known-innocent fillers and provide recommended pre-lineup instructions to witnesses (e.g., stating that the witness is not required to make an identification). Training also decreased non-recommended lineup practices, such as revealing the identity of the main suspect after a witness response. Feedback from the participants supports the conclusion that FAIR training improved knowledge of how to build lineups, instruct witnesses, and avoid undesirable and potentially biasing practices. Nevertheless, participants anticipated that incorporating the reform procedures into practice would provoke resistance from superiors and colleagues, which highlights the need for FAIR training to be supported by infrastructure, resources and policy that enable police officers to use evidence-based procedures in eyewitness identification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信