{"title":"Pomiędzy zabaw(k)ą a materiałem i pracą w praktyce pedagogii Montessori","authors":"Jarosław Jendza","doi":"10.26881/pwe.2022.54.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of qualitative research conducted among thirty-one Montessori 3–6 guides from Polish kindergartens. The main scope of the text is to outline the conceptions of play and work and the ways in which they are intertwined. The outcome space consists of four categories: 1. play as ethical and organizational challenge; 2. play as the obstacle in children’s development; 3. play as activity with no value; 4. play as work/work as play. The first category is framed by the rationality of play being important for the teachers and thus creating a dilemma whether to follow the child and let them play or to follow the Montessori curriculum and focus on free work? The second and the third categories are related with play being insignificant or negative for the development. The last category is the mode of thinking in which one cannot tell play and work apart. From this perspective both play and work are essential for the development of the child and the border between these two forms of activities is blurry. The last category initiates and invites to discuss and perhaps redefine the very concept of work in Montessori prepared environment.","PeriodicalId":365222,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2022.54.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文介绍了对31名波兰幼儿园蒙台梭利3-6导童进行定性研究的结果。本文的主要范围是概述游戏和工作的概念以及它们相互交织的方式。结果空间由四类组成:1。发挥道德和组织挑战;2. 游戏是儿童发展的障碍3.。游戏是一种没有价值的活动;4. Play as work/工作即娱乐。第一类是游戏对教师来说很重要的合理性,因此造成了一个两难境地,是跟随孩子,让他们玩,还是遵循蒙台梭利课程,专注于自由工作?第二类和第三类与玩耍无关紧要或对发展不利有关。最后一类是一种思维模式,在这种模式下,人们无法区分游戏和工作。从这个角度来看,游戏和工作对孩子的发展都是必不可少的,这两种形式的活动之间的界限是模糊的。最后一个类别发起并邀请讨论,也许重新定义蒙特梭利准备环境中工作的概念。
Pomiędzy zabaw(k)ą a materiałem i pracą w praktyce pedagogii Montessori
The article presents the results of qualitative research conducted among thirty-one Montessori 3–6 guides from Polish kindergartens. The main scope of the text is to outline the conceptions of play and work and the ways in which they are intertwined. The outcome space consists of four categories: 1. play as ethical and organizational challenge; 2. play as the obstacle in children’s development; 3. play as activity with no value; 4. play as work/work as play. The first category is framed by the rationality of play being important for the teachers and thus creating a dilemma whether to follow the child and let them play or to follow the Montessori curriculum and focus on free work? The second and the third categories are related with play being insignificant or negative for the development. The last category is the mode of thinking in which one cannot tell play and work apart. From this perspective both play and work are essential for the development of the child and the border between these two forms of activities is blurry. The last category initiates and invites to discuss and perhaps redefine the very concept of work in Montessori prepared environment.