评估学生的创造性思维在蒸汽教育:模型建设和验证

Zhihua Lin, Zeshan Lin, Zehui Zhan, Xianwei Wang
{"title":"评估学生的创造性思维在蒸汽教育:模型建设和验证","authors":"Zhihua Lin, Zeshan Lin, Zehui Zhan, Xianwei Wang","doi":"10.1145/3528137.3528143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective and feasible evaluation of students’ creative thinking is crucial for STEM education. The study considers the essential characteristics of STEAM and the core concept, pays attention to PISA-style assessment to set up the evaluation framework. We run two rounds of Delphi consultation and adopt the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine evaluation index weights. The Evaluation Index System of Student's Creative Thinking in STEAM Education is constructed and contains the Generate Diverse Ideas, Generate Creative Ideas, Generate Precise Ideas, Evaluate and Improve Ideas of 4 level indicators and 12 secondary indicators. The results show that the index system has good credibility (Cronbach's α=0.993) and rationality (KMO=0.97). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the indexes fit well. Among the four dimensions, the Evaluate and Improve Ideas were weighted largest, second to Generate Diverse Ideas and Generate Creative ideas, Generated Precise Ideas were weighted minimum. The index system can comprehensively evaluate the aspects of students' creative thinking in STEAM education, which provide reference and a necessary tool for STEAM educational evaluation.","PeriodicalId":440758,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Student's Creative Thinking in STEAM Education: Model Construction and Validation\",\"authors\":\"Zhihua Lin, Zeshan Lin, Zehui Zhan, Xianwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3528137.3528143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective and feasible evaluation of students’ creative thinking is crucial for STEM education. The study considers the essential characteristics of STEAM and the core concept, pays attention to PISA-style assessment to set up the evaluation framework. We run two rounds of Delphi consultation and adopt the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine evaluation index weights. The Evaluation Index System of Student's Creative Thinking in STEAM Education is constructed and contains the Generate Diverse Ideas, Generate Creative Ideas, Generate Precise Ideas, Evaluate and Improve Ideas of 4 level indicators and 12 secondary indicators. The results show that the index system has good credibility (Cronbach's α=0.993) and rationality (KMO=0.97). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the indexes fit well. Among the four dimensions, the Evaluate and Improve Ideas were weighted largest, second to Generate Diverse Ideas and Generate Creative ideas, Generated Precise Ideas were weighted minimum. The index system can comprehensively evaluate the aspects of students' creative thinking in STEAM education, which provide reference and a necessary tool for STEAM educational evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3528137.3528143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3528137.3528143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对学生创造性思维进行有效、可行的评价是STEM教育的关键。本研究考虑了STEAM的本质特征和核心概念,注重采用pisa式的评估来构建评估框架。通过两轮德尔菲咨询,采用层次分析法确定评价指标权重。构建了STEAM教育中学生创造性思维评价指标体系,包含“产生多样化的想法”、“产生创造性的想法”、“产生精确的想法”、“评价和改进想法”4个一级指标和12个二级指标。结果表明,该指标体系具有良好的信度(Cronbach’s α=0.993)和合理性(KMO=0.97)。验证性因子分析表明,各指标拟合良好。在四个维度中,“评估和改进想法”的权重最大,其次是“产生多样化的想法”和“产生创造性的想法”,“产生精确的想法”的权重最小。该指标体系可以综合评价STEAM教育中学生创造性思维的各个方面,为STEAM教育评价提供参考和必要的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Student's Creative Thinking in STEAM Education: Model Construction and Validation
Effective and feasible evaluation of students’ creative thinking is crucial for STEM education. The study considers the essential characteristics of STEAM and the core concept, pays attention to PISA-style assessment to set up the evaluation framework. We run two rounds of Delphi consultation and adopt the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine evaluation index weights. The Evaluation Index System of Student's Creative Thinking in STEAM Education is constructed and contains the Generate Diverse Ideas, Generate Creative Ideas, Generate Precise Ideas, Evaluate and Improve Ideas of 4 level indicators and 12 secondary indicators. The results show that the index system has good credibility (Cronbach's α=0.993) and rationality (KMO=0.97). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the indexes fit well. Among the four dimensions, the Evaluate and Improve Ideas were weighted largest, second to Generate Diverse Ideas and Generate Creative ideas, Generated Precise Ideas were weighted minimum. The index system can comprehensively evaluate the aspects of students' creative thinking in STEAM education, which provide reference and a necessary tool for STEAM educational evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信