景观中的死亡:在高速公路上标记死亡地点的现代传统的空间方面(以俄罗斯联邦高速公路a - 151、r - 178、r - 241为例)

M. Matlin
{"title":"景观中的死亡:在高速公路上标记死亡地点的现代传统的空间方面(以俄罗斯联邦高速公路a - 151、r - 178、r - 241为例)","authors":"M. Matlin","doi":"10.17072/2079-7877-2021-4-59-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important aspect of the study of cultural space is the analysis of ways and forms of commemoration and memorialization of road accident victims. The placement of traditional cemetery monuments in it, installed at the place of people’s death, transfers the symbolism of death from strictly defined places of cemeteries into public space and turns it into sceneries of death or landscapes of death. It is no coincidence that many of the motorists and professional drivers who use such highways say that it is like driving in a cemetery. This article is the first in Russia to analyze this modern phenomenon based on the material obtained from a survey of part of three federal highways (A 151, R 241, R 178). It is shown that in Russia roadside monuments are not limited to the Christian cross, and their locations are much more diverse than in Europe and North America. In general, there are two trends – to place roadside monuments as close to the highway as possible (on the roadside, slope, behind the bump or on it) and in or near the green zone (in the forest or forest plantation) and a transitional one – to place them in the roadside lane. In the first case, the choice of the location is conditioned by the desire to approach the place of death of a loved one as close as possible, the second case demonstrates the desire to protect the memorial sign, to place it in accordance with the tradition of cemetery, primarily rural cemetery, where trees on the graves played an important role. Our analysis shows that different types of roadside monuments have different effects on the formation of the cultural landscape along the highways. Memorials are the most striking examples of ‘cemetery culture’, they mostly reformat the roadside space into landscapes or sceneries of death. In turn, gazebos, flowerpots with live or artificial flowers that do not have traditional plaques and photographs of the dead, i.e. do not reproduce the cemetery tradition, do this to the minimum extent. Crosses, steles and obelisks as the most typical cemetery structures occupy, to a certain extent, an intermediate position between memorials and flowerpots and gazebos.","PeriodicalId":345845,"journal":{"name":"Географический вестник = Geographical bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEATH IN THE LANDSCAPE: A SPATIAL ASPECT OF THE MODERN TRADITION OF MARKING PLACES OF DEATH ON HIGHWAYS (A CASE STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERAL HIGHWAYS A 151, R 178, R 241)\",\"authors\":\"M. Matlin\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2079-7877-2021-4-59-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An important aspect of the study of cultural space is the analysis of ways and forms of commemoration and memorialization of road accident victims. The placement of traditional cemetery monuments in it, installed at the place of people’s death, transfers the symbolism of death from strictly defined places of cemeteries into public space and turns it into sceneries of death or landscapes of death. It is no coincidence that many of the motorists and professional drivers who use such highways say that it is like driving in a cemetery. This article is the first in Russia to analyze this modern phenomenon based on the material obtained from a survey of part of three federal highways (A 151, R 241, R 178). It is shown that in Russia roadside monuments are not limited to the Christian cross, and their locations are much more diverse than in Europe and North America. In general, there are two trends – to place roadside monuments as close to the highway as possible (on the roadside, slope, behind the bump or on it) and in or near the green zone (in the forest or forest plantation) and a transitional one – to place them in the roadside lane. In the first case, the choice of the location is conditioned by the desire to approach the place of death of a loved one as close as possible, the second case demonstrates the desire to protect the memorial sign, to place it in accordance with the tradition of cemetery, primarily rural cemetery, where trees on the graves played an important role. Our analysis shows that different types of roadside monuments have different effects on the formation of the cultural landscape along the highways. Memorials are the most striking examples of ‘cemetery culture’, they mostly reformat the roadside space into landscapes or sceneries of death. In turn, gazebos, flowerpots with live or artificial flowers that do not have traditional plaques and photographs of the dead, i.e. do not reproduce the cemetery tradition, do this to the minimum extent. Crosses, steles and obelisks as the most typical cemetery structures occupy, to a certain extent, an intermediate position between memorials and flowerpots and gazebos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Географический вестник = Geographical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Географический вестник = Geographical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2021-4-59-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Географический вестник = Geographical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2021-4-59-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

文化空间研究的一个重要方面是分析道路交通事故受害者的纪念和纪念方式和形式。传统的墓地纪念碑安置在人们死亡的地方,将死亡的象征意义从严格界定的墓地转移到公共空间,将其变成死亡的风景或死亡的景观。许多驾车者和职业司机说,在这样的高速公路上开车就像在墓地里开车,这并非巧合。本文基于对三条联邦公路(a151、r241、r178)部分路段的调查获得的资料,在俄罗斯首次分析了这一现代现象。这表明,在俄罗斯路边的纪念碑并不局限于基督教十字架,它们的位置比欧洲和北美更多样化。一般来说,有两种趋势-将路边纪念碑放置在尽可能靠近高速公路的地方(在路边,斜坡上,凸起后面或上面),在绿色区域内或附近(在森林或森林种植园中),以及一个过渡-将它们放置在路边车道上。在第一种情况下,地点的选择取决于尽可能接近亲人的死亡地点的愿望,第二种情况表明了保护纪念标志的愿望,按照墓地的传统放置它,主要是农村墓地,坟墓上的树木发挥了重要作用。分析表明,不同类型的路边古迹对公路沿线文化景观的形成有不同的影响。纪念碑是“墓地文化”最引人注目的例子,它们大多将路边空间重新塑造成景观或死亡景观。反过来,没有传统牌匾和死者照片(即不复制墓地传统)的凉亭、有活花或人造花的花盆,在最小程度上做到了这一点。十字架、石碑、方尖碑作为最典型的墓地结构,在一定程度上占据了纪念碑与花盆、凉亭之间的中间位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEATH IN THE LANDSCAPE: A SPATIAL ASPECT OF THE MODERN TRADITION OF MARKING PLACES OF DEATH ON HIGHWAYS (A CASE STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERAL HIGHWAYS A 151, R 178, R 241)
An important aspect of the study of cultural space is the analysis of ways and forms of commemoration and memorialization of road accident victims. The placement of traditional cemetery monuments in it, installed at the place of people’s death, transfers the symbolism of death from strictly defined places of cemeteries into public space and turns it into sceneries of death or landscapes of death. It is no coincidence that many of the motorists and professional drivers who use such highways say that it is like driving in a cemetery. This article is the first in Russia to analyze this modern phenomenon based on the material obtained from a survey of part of three federal highways (A 151, R 241, R 178). It is shown that in Russia roadside monuments are not limited to the Christian cross, and their locations are much more diverse than in Europe and North America. In general, there are two trends – to place roadside monuments as close to the highway as possible (on the roadside, slope, behind the bump or on it) and in or near the green zone (in the forest or forest plantation) and a transitional one – to place them in the roadside lane. In the first case, the choice of the location is conditioned by the desire to approach the place of death of a loved one as close as possible, the second case demonstrates the desire to protect the memorial sign, to place it in accordance with the tradition of cemetery, primarily rural cemetery, where trees on the graves played an important role. Our analysis shows that different types of roadside monuments have different effects on the formation of the cultural landscape along the highways. Memorials are the most striking examples of ‘cemetery culture’, they mostly reformat the roadside space into landscapes or sceneries of death. In turn, gazebos, flowerpots with live or artificial flowers that do not have traditional plaques and photographs of the dead, i.e. do not reproduce the cemetery tradition, do this to the minimum extent. Crosses, steles and obelisks as the most typical cemetery structures occupy, to a certain extent, an intermediate position between memorials and flowerpots and gazebos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信