{"title":"一个评估影响知识获取因素的启发式框架","authors":"M. Prietula, P. Feltovich, F. Marchak","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe a heuristic framework for understanding and investigating factors influencing cognitive malleability and, consequently, knowledge acquisition efforts. To examine their framework, they investigated the effects of modifying task materials and goal availability on engineering problem-solving performance and the nature of the knowledge acquired. For one set of four engineers, the dynamic group, any manipulations made by an engineer to a component parameter would be immediately followed by an analysis of the effects of the manipulation. The static group (also four engineers) received no feedback.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":384442,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A heuristic framework for assessing factors influencing knowledge acquisition\",\"authors\":\"M. Prietula, P. Feltovich, F. Marchak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors describe a heuristic framework for understanding and investigating factors influencing cognitive malleability and, consequently, knowledge acquisition efforts. To examine their framework, they investigated the effects of modifying task materials and goal availability on engineering problem-solving performance and the nature of the knowledge acquired. For one set of four engineers, the dynamic group, any manipulations made by an engineer to a component parameter would be immediately followed by an analysis of the effects of the manipulation. The static group (also four engineers) received no feedback.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":384442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A heuristic framework for assessing factors influencing knowledge acquisition
The authors describe a heuristic framework for understanding and investigating factors influencing cognitive malleability and, consequently, knowledge acquisition efforts. To examine their framework, they investigated the effects of modifying task materials and goal availability on engineering problem-solving performance and the nature of the knowledge acquired. For one set of four engineers, the dynamic group, any manipulations made by an engineer to a component parameter would be immediately followed by an analysis of the effects of the manipulation. The static group (also four engineers) received no feedback.<>