热力学在现有和新兴技术生命周期评估中的作用

B. Bakshi, N. U. Ukidwe
{"title":"热力学在现有和新兴技术生命周期评估中的作用","authors":"B. Bakshi, N. U. Ukidwe","doi":"10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some of the outstanding challenges faced by traditional LCA include the following. LCA is mainly an \"output side\" method due to its focus on emissions and their impact, but such data are often difficult to find, particularly for emerging technologies. Furthermore, although an important goal of LCA is to evaluate the environmental sustainability of technological alternatives, the very ecosystem goods and services that sustain all economic activities are usually ignored. This paper describes how thermodynamics can complement and enhance LCA by addressing these challenges. Ecosystem goods and services may be represented as the cumulative exergy consumed in ecological processes necessary for producing them. This may be calculated via methods in systems ecology and combined with engineering thermodynamics for joint analysis of industrial and ecological systems. A thermodynamic input-output model of the US economy is developed based on this approach, and is used for hybrid LCA. Accounting for ecosystem goods and services is likely to provide a reasonable proxy to life cycle impact even without knowing details about emissions and their impact. This is because as per the second law, exergy is not conserved, but is lost in each transformation step. The exergy lost to the surroundings creates disorder in the environment, which should be related to the impact of emissions. This implies that among alternatives with similar utility, the process with a higher life cycle thermodynamic efficiency should have a smaller life cycle environmental impact. This talk will present some examples as preliminary support of this hypothesis and describe challenges and on-going work for obtaining a more rigorous statistical validation.","PeriodicalId":141255,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of thermodynamics in life cycle assessment of existing and emerging technologies\",\"authors\":\"B. Bakshi, N. U. Ukidwe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some of the outstanding challenges faced by traditional LCA include the following. LCA is mainly an \\\"output side\\\" method due to its focus on emissions and their impact, but such data are often difficult to find, particularly for emerging technologies. Furthermore, although an important goal of LCA is to evaluate the environmental sustainability of technological alternatives, the very ecosystem goods and services that sustain all economic activities are usually ignored. This paper describes how thermodynamics can complement and enhance LCA by addressing these challenges. Ecosystem goods and services may be represented as the cumulative exergy consumed in ecological processes necessary for producing them. This may be calculated via methods in systems ecology and combined with engineering thermodynamics for joint analysis of industrial and ecological systems. A thermodynamic input-output model of the US economy is developed based on this approach, and is used for hybrid LCA. Accounting for ecosystem goods and services is likely to provide a reasonable proxy to life cycle impact even without knowing details about emissions and their impact. This is because as per the second law, exergy is not conserved, but is lost in each transformation step. The exergy lost to the surroundings creates disorder in the environment, which should be related to the impact of emissions. This implies that among alternatives with similar utility, the process with a higher life cycle thermodynamic efficiency should have a smaller life cycle environmental impact. This talk will present some examples as preliminary support of this hypothesis and describe challenges and on-going work for obtaining a more rigorous statistical validation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

传统LCA面临的一些突出挑战包括:LCA主要是一种“产出方”方法,因为它侧重于排放及其影响,但这类数据往往很难找到,特别是对新兴技术而言。此外,尽管LCA的一个重要目标是评估技术替代方案的环境可持续性,但维持所有经济活动的生态系统产品和服务通常被忽视。本文描述了热力学如何通过解决这些挑战来补充和增强LCA。生态系统产品和服务可以表示为在生产它们所必需的生态过程中消耗的累积能量。这可以通过系统生态学的方法来计算,并结合工程热力学来联合分析工业系统和生态系统。在此基础上建立了美国经济的热力学投入产出模型,并将其用于混合LCA。即使不知道排放及其影响的细节,对生态系统产品和服务的核算也可能为生命周期影响提供一个合理的代理。这是因为根据第二定律,能量不是守恒的,而是在每一个转化过程中都损失掉了。损失到周围环境中的能量造成了环境的混乱,这应该与排放的影响有关。这意味着在具有类似效用的替代方案中,具有较高生命周期热力学效率的过程应该具有较小的生命周期环境影响。本讲座将提供一些例子作为这一假设的初步支持,并描述挑战和正在进行的工作,以获得更严格的统计验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of thermodynamics in life cycle assessment of existing and emerging technologies
Some of the outstanding challenges faced by traditional LCA include the following. LCA is mainly an "output side" method due to its focus on emissions and their impact, but such data are often difficult to find, particularly for emerging technologies. Furthermore, although an important goal of LCA is to evaluate the environmental sustainability of technological alternatives, the very ecosystem goods and services that sustain all economic activities are usually ignored. This paper describes how thermodynamics can complement and enhance LCA by addressing these challenges. Ecosystem goods and services may be represented as the cumulative exergy consumed in ecological processes necessary for producing them. This may be calculated via methods in systems ecology and combined with engineering thermodynamics for joint analysis of industrial and ecological systems. A thermodynamic input-output model of the US economy is developed based on this approach, and is used for hybrid LCA. Accounting for ecosystem goods and services is likely to provide a reasonable proxy to life cycle impact even without knowing details about emissions and their impact. This is because as per the second law, exergy is not conserved, but is lost in each transformation step. The exergy lost to the surroundings creates disorder in the environment, which should be related to the impact of emissions. This implies that among alternatives with similar utility, the process with a higher life cycle thermodynamic efficiency should have a smaller life cycle environmental impact. This talk will present some examples as preliminary support of this hypothesis and describe challenges and on-going work for obtaining a more rigorous statistical validation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信