{"title":"初审法院和宗教法庭之间关于伊斯兰继承人问题的权力斗争","authors":"Ilham Thohari","doi":"10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V9I2.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at discussing about a lawsuit of authority between a state court and a religion court related to authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim. In this article, it is explained that receiving, investigating, and deciding a lawsuit of heir among Muslim are not absolutely the authorities of the religion court, but the state court also has these authorities. It is based on (1) The Law number 2, 1986 jo Stbl . 1937 number 116, the article 50 which states that the state court has duty and authority to investigate, decide, and solve criminal and civil cases in the first level, and (2) the explanation of The Law number 3, 2006, article 49 about the religion court which states that the meaning of among Muslim is included people or companies which voluntarily follow Islamic law. Therefore, it can be conclude that the religion court has authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim if they voluntarily follow the Islamic law, and the state court has authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim if they do not voluntarily follow the Islamic law. Keywords: Konflik Kewenangan, Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Agama, Perkara Sengketa Waris Orang Islam","PeriodicalId":445413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Universum","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KONFLIK KEWENANGAN ANTARA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM MENANGAI PERKARA SENGKETA WARIS ORANG ISLAM\",\"authors\":\"Ilham Thohari\",\"doi\":\"10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V9I2.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims at discussing about a lawsuit of authority between a state court and a religion court related to authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim. In this article, it is explained that receiving, investigating, and deciding a lawsuit of heir among Muslim are not absolutely the authorities of the religion court, but the state court also has these authorities. It is based on (1) The Law number 2, 1986 jo Stbl . 1937 number 116, the article 50 which states that the state court has duty and authority to investigate, decide, and solve criminal and civil cases in the first level, and (2) the explanation of The Law number 3, 2006, article 49 about the religion court which states that the meaning of among Muslim is included people or companies which voluntarily follow Islamic law. Therefore, it can be conclude that the religion court has authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim if they voluntarily follow the Islamic law, and the state court has authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim if they do not voluntarily follow the Islamic law. Keywords: Konflik Kewenangan, Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Agama, Perkara Sengketa Waris Orang Islam\",\"PeriodicalId\":445413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Universum\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Universum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V9I2.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Universum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V9I2.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文旨在探讨国家法院与宗教法院之间有关受理、调查、判决穆斯林继承人诉讼的权力诉讼问题。本文阐述了受理、调查和裁决穆斯林继承人诉讼并非宗教法院的绝对权力,而州法院也具有这些权力。它是基于(1)1986年第2号法律。1937年第116号,第50条,其中规定国家法院有责任和权力调查,决定和解决第一级的刑事和民事案件,以及(2)对2006年第3号法律的解释,第49条关于宗教法院,其中规定穆斯林的含义包括自愿遵守伊斯兰法律的个人或公司。因此,可以得出结论,宗教法院对自愿遵守伊斯兰教法的穆斯林继承人的诉讼具有受理、调查和判决的权力,而国家法院对非自愿遵守伊斯兰教法的穆斯林继承人的诉讼具有受理、调查和判决的权力。关键词:Konflik Kewenangan, Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Agama, Perkara Sengketa Waris Orang Islam
KONFLIK KEWENANGAN ANTARA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM MENANGAI PERKARA SENGKETA WARIS ORANG ISLAM
This article aims at discussing about a lawsuit of authority between a state court and a religion court related to authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim. In this article, it is explained that receiving, investigating, and deciding a lawsuit of heir among Muslim are not absolutely the authorities of the religion court, but the state court also has these authorities. It is based on (1) The Law number 2, 1986 jo Stbl . 1937 number 116, the article 50 which states that the state court has duty and authority to investigate, decide, and solve criminal and civil cases in the first level, and (2) the explanation of The Law number 3, 2006, article 49 about the religion court which states that the meaning of among Muslim is included people or companies which voluntarily follow Islamic law. Therefore, it can be conclude that the religion court has authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim if they voluntarily follow the Islamic law, and the state court has authorities to receive, investigate, and decide a lawsuit of heir among Muslim if they do not voluntarily follow the Islamic law. Keywords: Konflik Kewenangan, Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Agama, Perkara Sengketa Waris Orang Islam