英语作为平权行动…但是肯定什么?肯定空间中的相互作用研究

Uma Maheshwari Chimirala
{"title":"英语作为平权行动…但是肯定什么?肯定空间中的相互作用研究","authors":"Uma Maheshwari Chimirala","doi":"10.36832/beltaj.2018.0201.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Affirmative Actions (AA) in education are presumed to be interventions that enable access to educational spaces and by extension to quality learning opportunities. The assumption is that these programs would build capabilities that affirm their identities while providing equal opportunities to socio-economic growth and thus, again by extension enable agency. But is that what they do? We begin by placing agency as the terminal goal of AA. We then situate our study within a ̳Third space‘ framework to examine the interactional space in an AA – A space of asymmetrical power and advantage inhabited by the implementer of the AA and a participant in an AA intervention. Therefore the question we ask in this study is: how are structures of dominance produced? Based on the analysis of the interactions we find several power-inflected controls that impact the actors of AA. This paper reports three sets of language use patterns and three modes of establishing dominance, all of which work in tandem to annihilate any possibility of nurturing the capability to act and voice oneself. Based on our study we propose that if AA has to materialize into affirming agency then the possibility of contestation and mediation needs to be built into the AA program. How and what changes need to be brought in to humanize each of the stakeholders is the billion dollar question.","PeriodicalId":142370,"journal":{"name":"BELTA Journal","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English as Affirmative Action ... But Affirming What? A Study of Interactions in the Affirmative Space\",\"authors\":\"Uma Maheshwari Chimirala\",\"doi\":\"10.36832/beltaj.2018.0201.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Affirmative Actions (AA) in education are presumed to be interventions that enable access to educational spaces and by extension to quality learning opportunities. The assumption is that these programs would build capabilities that affirm their identities while providing equal opportunities to socio-economic growth and thus, again by extension enable agency. But is that what they do? We begin by placing agency as the terminal goal of AA. We then situate our study within a ̳Third space‘ framework to examine the interactional space in an AA – A space of asymmetrical power and advantage inhabited by the implementer of the AA and a participant in an AA intervention. Therefore the question we ask in this study is: how are structures of dominance produced? Based on the analysis of the interactions we find several power-inflected controls that impact the actors of AA. This paper reports three sets of language use patterns and three modes of establishing dominance, all of which work in tandem to annihilate any possibility of nurturing the capability to act and voice oneself. Based on our study we propose that if AA has to materialize into affirming agency then the possibility of contestation and mediation needs to be built into the AA program. How and what changes need to be brought in to humanize each of the stakeholders is the billion dollar question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BELTA Journal\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BELTA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36832/beltaj.2018.0201.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BELTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36832/beltaj.2018.0201.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育中的平权行动(AA)被认为是一种干预措施,使人们能够获得教育空间,进而获得高质量的学习机会。我们的假设是,这些项目将建立能力,确认他们的身份,同时为社会经济增长提供平等的机会,从而再次延伸,使机构成为可能。但这就是他们所做的吗?我们首先把代理作为AA的终极目标。然后,我们将我们的研究置于一个“第三空间”的框架中,以检验AA中的互动空间——AA的实施者和AA干预的参与者所居住的权力和优势不对称的空间。因此,我们在这项研究中提出的问题是:优势结构是如何产生的?基于对相互作用的分析,我们发现了几个影响AA行为者的权力影响控制。本文报告了三套语言使用模式和三种建立支配地位的模式,所有这些都协同工作,以消灭培养自己行动和表达能力的任何可能性。基于我们的研究,我们提出,如果AA必须成为肯定机构,那么就需要在AA计划中建立争议和调解的可能性。如何以及需要哪些变化来使每个利益相关者人性化是一个价值数十亿美元的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
English as Affirmative Action ... But Affirming What? A Study of Interactions in the Affirmative Space
Affirmative Actions (AA) in education are presumed to be interventions that enable access to educational spaces and by extension to quality learning opportunities. The assumption is that these programs would build capabilities that affirm their identities while providing equal opportunities to socio-economic growth and thus, again by extension enable agency. But is that what they do? We begin by placing agency as the terminal goal of AA. We then situate our study within a ̳Third space‘ framework to examine the interactional space in an AA – A space of asymmetrical power and advantage inhabited by the implementer of the AA and a participant in an AA intervention. Therefore the question we ask in this study is: how are structures of dominance produced? Based on the analysis of the interactions we find several power-inflected controls that impact the actors of AA. This paper reports three sets of language use patterns and three modes of establishing dominance, all of which work in tandem to annihilate any possibility of nurturing the capability to act and voice oneself. Based on our study we propose that if AA has to materialize into affirming agency then the possibility of contestation and mediation needs to be built into the AA program. How and what changes need to be brought in to humanize each of the stakeholders is the billion dollar question.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信