同时使用污名化和分类学校资助政策对成绩较差学生的考试和中学后成绩的影响

SeungHoon Han, Hosung Sohn
{"title":"同时使用污名化和分类学校资助政策对成绩较差学生的考试和中学后成绩的影响","authors":"SeungHoon Han, Hosung Sohn","doi":"10.22841/KERDOI.2020.36.2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the impact of one type of school-based accountability system―the simultaneous use of stigmatization and categorical school funding―on test scores and postsecondary outcomes. We conduct randomization inference in the context of regression discontinuity design by exploiting the discontinuous rule used in the accountability system in South Korea. The results show that the joint use of stigmatization and funding leads to a statistically and practically significant increase in test scores (7, 6, and 5 percentile points for reading, math, and English, respectively). Subgroup analyses by urban or rural areas show that the policy leads to a practically but not statistically significant increase in the share of students taking college entrance exams (4 percentage points) and a practically and statistically significant increase in the share of students matriculating into four-year colleges (9 percentage points) only for schools located in rural areas. We do not find any practically and statistically significant increase in the post-secondary outcomes for schools located in urban areas.","PeriodicalId":426169,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Economic Review","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Simultaneous Use of the Stigmatization and Categorical School Funding Policy on the Test and Post-Secondary Outcomes of Lower-Achieving Students\",\"authors\":\"SeungHoon Han, Hosung Sohn\",\"doi\":\"10.22841/KERDOI.2020.36.2.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes the impact of one type of school-based accountability system―the simultaneous use of stigmatization and categorical school funding―on test scores and postsecondary outcomes. We conduct randomization inference in the context of regression discontinuity design by exploiting the discontinuous rule used in the accountability system in South Korea. The results show that the joint use of stigmatization and funding leads to a statistically and practically significant increase in test scores (7, 6, and 5 percentile points for reading, math, and English, respectively). Subgroup analyses by urban or rural areas show that the policy leads to a practically but not statistically significant increase in the share of students taking college entrance exams (4 percentage points) and a practically and statistically significant increase in the share of students matriculating into four-year colleges (9 percentage points) only for schools located in rural areas. We do not find any practically and statistically significant increase in the post-secondary outcomes for schools located in urban areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22841/KERDOI.2020.36.2.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22841/KERDOI.2020.36.2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了一种以学校为基础的问责制——同时使用污名化和分类学校资助——对考试成绩和高等教育成果的影响。我们通过利用韩国问责制中使用的不连续规则,在回归不连续设计的背景下进行随机化推理。结果表明,污名化和资助的联合使用导致了统计上和实践上显著的考试成绩提高(阅读、数学和英语分别提高了7、6和5个百分点)。城市或农村地区的分组分析表明,该政策导致参加大学入学考试的学生比例实际增加(但统计上不显著)(4个百分点),而仅在农村地区的学校,四年制大学的学生比例实际上和统计上显著增加(9个百分点)。我们没有发现位于城市地区的学校在中学后教育成果方面有任何实际和统计上的显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the Simultaneous Use of the Stigmatization and Categorical School Funding Policy on the Test and Post-Secondary Outcomes of Lower-Achieving Students
This study analyzes the impact of one type of school-based accountability system―the simultaneous use of stigmatization and categorical school funding―on test scores and postsecondary outcomes. We conduct randomization inference in the context of regression discontinuity design by exploiting the discontinuous rule used in the accountability system in South Korea. The results show that the joint use of stigmatization and funding leads to a statistically and practically significant increase in test scores (7, 6, and 5 percentile points for reading, math, and English, respectively). Subgroup analyses by urban or rural areas show that the policy leads to a practically but not statistically significant increase in the share of students taking college entrance exams (4 percentage points) and a practically and statistically significant increase in the share of students matriculating into four-year colleges (9 percentage points) only for schools located in rural areas. We do not find any practically and statistically significant increase in the post-secondary outcomes for schools located in urban areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信