哪种软件设计开发方法适合工程教育

Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order Pub Date : 1991-09-21 DOI:10.1109/FIE.1991.187572

I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, T. Welzer

{"title":"哪种软件设计开发方法适合工程教育","authors":"I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, T. Welzer","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1991.187572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted to highlight the technicality of two quite different but well known software development methodologies: System Analysis-System Design (SA-SD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). There was no attempt to reach a general conclusion about which software development methodology is better, looking from all aspects. Comparison was done by means of a questionnaire which was completed by 12 young engineers after they had finished their seminar work in postgraduate study. The results obtained speak in favor of the SA-SD methodology because it is more understandable to an engineer.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":414138,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which software design development methodology is appropriate for engineering education\",\"authors\":\"I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, T. Welzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1991.187572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experiment was conducted to highlight the technicality of two quite different but well known software development methodologies: System Analysis-System Design (SA-SD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). There was no attempt to reach a general conclusion about which software development methodology is better, looking from all aspects. Comparison was done by means of a questionnaire which was completed by 12 young engineers after they had finished their seminar work in postgraduate study. The results obtained speak in favor of the SA-SD methodology because it is more understandable to an engineer.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":414138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1991.187572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1991.187572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

进行了一个实验来强调两种完全不同但众所周知的软件开发方法的技术性:系统分析-系统设计(SA-SD)和杰克逊系统开发(JSD)。从各个方面来看，并没有试图得出关于哪种软件开发方法更好的一般结论。比较是通过问卷调查的方式进行的，问卷调查是由12名年轻的工程师在完成研究生的研讨会工作后完成的。获得的结果支持SA-SD方法，因为它对工程师来说更容易理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Which software design development methodology is appropriate for engineering education

An experiment was conducted to highlight the technicality of two quite different but well known software development methodologies: System Analysis-System Design (SA-SD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). There was no attempt to reach a general conclusion about which software development methodology is better, looking from all aspects. Comparison was done by means of a questionnaire which was completed by 12 young engineers after they had finished their seminar work in postgraduate study. The results obtained speak in favor of the SA-SD methodology because it is more understandable to an engineer.<>

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order

自引率

0.00%

发文量