互动对网络学习满意度和结果影响的实证研究:综述与未来研究方向

Sean B. Eom
{"title":"互动对网络学习满意度和结果影响的实证研究:综述与未来研究方向","authors":"Sean B. Eom","doi":"10.1109/ICETC.2014.6998909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have reviewed several e-learning empirical research studies that have investigated the effects of interaction on satisfaction and outcomes of e-learning, published between 2001 and 2010. Their conclusions seemed inconclusive, ranging from no relationships between interactions and two dependent variables (satisfaction and learning outcomes) to positive relationships. In-depth analyses of these empirical papers were conducted by examining dependent and independent constructs and their indicators, research methods, and participants' characteristics. We conclude that the conflicting results are due to primarily different definitions of the dependent and independent constructs and their indicator variables, different research methods employed, and participant's demographic characteristics. In order to build e-learning theories and a cumulative research tradition, it is necessary to (1) define the dependent/independent constructs and their indicators, (2) employ common research methodology, and (3) test commonly accepted causal models. Without fulfilling these, e-learning empirical research will continue to produce inconclusive findings.","PeriodicalId":102315,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Education Technologies and Computers (ICETC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical research on effects of interaction on elearning satisfaction and outcome: a review and future research direction\",\"authors\":\"Sean B. Eom\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICETC.2014.6998909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have reviewed several e-learning empirical research studies that have investigated the effects of interaction on satisfaction and outcomes of e-learning, published between 2001 and 2010. Their conclusions seemed inconclusive, ranging from no relationships between interactions and two dependent variables (satisfaction and learning outcomes) to positive relationships. In-depth analyses of these empirical papers were conducted by examining dependent and independent constructs and their indicators, research methods, and participants' characteristics. We conclude that the conflicting results are due to primarily different definitions of the dependent and independent constructs and their indicator variables, different research methods employed, and participant's demographic characteristics. In order to build e-learning theories and a cumulative research tradition, it is necessary to (1) define the dependent/independent constructs and their indicators, (2) employ common research methodology, and (3) test commonly accepted causal models. Without fulfilling these, e-learning empirical research will continue to produce inconclusive findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Conference on Education Technologies and Computers (ICETC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Conference on Education Technologies and Computers (ICETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2014.6998909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Education Technologies and Computers (ICETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2014.6998909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们回顾了2001年至2010年间发表的几项电子学习实证研究,这些研究调查了互动对电子学习满意度和结果的影响。他们的结论似乎不确定,从互动和两个因变量(满意度和学习成果)之间没有关系到积极的关系。本文从依赖和独立结构及其指标、研究方法和参与者特征等方面对这些实证论文进行了深入分析。我们的结论是,相互矛盾的结果主要是由于依赖和独立结构及其指标变量的不同定义,不同的研究方法所采用的,和参与者的人口统计学特征。为了建立电子学习理论和累积研究传统,有必要(1)定义依赖/独立结构及其指标,(2)采用共同的研究方法,(3)检验普遍接受的因果模型。如果不实现这些,电子学习的实证研究将继续产生不确定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical research on effects of interaction on elearning satisfaction and outcome: a review and future research direction
We have reviewed several e-learning empirical research studies that have investigated the effects of interaction on satisfaction and outcomes of e-learning, published between 2001 and 2010. Their conclusions seemed inconclusive, ranging from no relationships between interactions and two dependent variables (satisfaction and learning outcomes) to positive relationships. In-depth analyses of these empirical papers were conducted by examining dependent and independent constructs and their indicators, research methods, and participants' characteristics. We conclude that the conflicting results are due to primarily different definitions of the dependent and independent constructs and their indicator variables, different research methods employed, and participant's demographic characteristics. In order to build e-learning theories and a cumulative research tradition, it is necessary to (1) define the dependent/independent constructs and their indicators, (2) employ common research methodology, and (3) test commonly accepted causal models. Without fulfilling these, e-learning empirical research will continue to produce inconclusive findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信